Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study establishes three synthetic indicators derived from academic traces—assignee traces T 1, T 2 and ST—and investigates their application in evaluating technological performance of assignees. Patent data for the top 100 assignees in three fields, “Computer Hardware & Software”, “Motors, Engines & Parts”, and “Drugs & Medical”, were retrieved from USPTO for further analysis. The results reveal that traces are indeed valid and useful indicators for measuring technological performance and providing detailed technical information about assignees and the industry. In addition, we investigate the relationship between traces and three other indicators: patent citation counts, Current Impact Index and patent h-index. In comparison with the three other indicators, traces demonstrate unique advantages and can be a good complement to patent citation analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, P., Gupta, B., & Garg, K. (2000). Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitzman, A., & Narin, F. (2001). U. S. Patent. US6175824.

  • Chang, K. C., Chen, D. Z., & Huang, M. H. (2012). The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 131–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. Z., Lin, W. Y. C., & Huang, M. H. (2007). Using essential patent index and essential technological strength to evaluate industrial technological innovation competitiveness. Scientometrics, 71(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20–32.

  • Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., & Hall, B. H. (1988). The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Guan, J. C., & Gao, X. (2009). Exploring the h-Index at patent level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look (Working Paper No. 7741). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (Working Paper No. 8498). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2001). Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, M., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2001). Value relevance of nonfinancial information: The case of patent data. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 17(3), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, C. H., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2011a). Positioning research and innovation performance using shape centroids of h-core and h-tail. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, C. H., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2011b). Ranking patent assignee performance by h-index and shape descriptors. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49(1), 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration—An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics, 61(3), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapsalis, E., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy, 35(10), 1631–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. (2001). A relationship between technology indicators and stock market performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, F.-M., Hsieh, C.-H., Peng, Y.-N., & Chu, Y.-W. (2011). Using patent data to analyze trends and the technological strategies of the amorphous silicon thin-film solar cell industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. J. (2007). Factors to evaluate a patent in addition to citations. Scientometrics, 71(3), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, F. Y., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The “Academic Trace” of the performance matrix: A mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 742–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, F. Y., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Probing the h-core: An investigation of the tail-core ratio for rank distributions. Scientometrics, 84(2), 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. T. (2009). The e-Index, complementing the h-Index for excess citations. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support from NSFC Grant No. 71173187, and thank Ms. Huei-Ru Dong for data processing, and Ms. Wei-Tzu Huang for data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Mu-Hsuan Huang & Danqi Shen

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Industrial Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Dar-Zen Chen

  3. Department of Information Resource Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Mona S. Wang

  4. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Fred Y. Ye

Authors
  1. Mu-Hsuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dar-Zen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danqi Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mona S. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fred Y. Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dar-Zen Chen or Fred Y. Ye.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 Top 100 assignees with highest citations and their countries
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, MH., Chen, DZ., Shen, D. et al. Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields. Scientometrics 104, 61–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1604-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1604-8

Keywords