Abstract
The aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective bibliometric analysis of articles about traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) research in PubMed and to learn about the development and perspective of TCM. A systematic bibliometric search was performed based on the PubMed database covering related publications between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014. Numbers and type of articles, countries and language of publications, as well as major journals were analyzed in accordance with bibliometrics methodologies. The retrieve results were analyzed and described in the form of texts, tables, and graphs. A total of 42,192 articles were identified from the PubMed database, among which 43.56 % were published as original articles. The articles were originated from 102 countries and territories. China was ranked first with 20,121 articles, followed by United States with 2207 articles. 57.74 % of the articles are published in English. 4364 articles were published by Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. And complementary medicine was the most focused research are involving 30,544 articles. The publication activity of TCM literature increased rapidly in the past 20 years, indicating enhanced attention attracted to TCM and more research input. In view of its great advances achieved in scientific studies, TCM will continue to play an important role in medical research.
References
Bornmann, L. (2013). Assigning publications to multiple subject categories for bibliometric analysis: An empirical case study based on percentiles. Journal of Documentation, 70(1), 3.
Canas-Guerrero, I., Mazarron, F. R., Pou-Merina, A., Calleja-Perucho, C., & Diaz-Rubio, G. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of research activity in the “Agronomy” category from the Web of Science, 1997–2011. European Journal of Agronomy, 50, 19–28.
Chabowski, B. R., Samiee, S., & Hult, G. T. M. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6), 622–634.
Cheung, F. (2011). TCM: Made in China. Nature, 480(7378), S82–S83.
Chiu, W.-T., & Ho, Y.-S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73(1), 3–17.
Diekhoff, T., Schlattmann, P., & Dewey, M. (2013). Impact of article language in multi-language medical journals—A bibliometric analysis of self-citations and impact factor. PLoS One, 8(10), e76816.
Doms, A., & Schroeder, M. (2005). GoPubMed: Exploring PubMed with the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(suppl 2), W783–W786.
Feng, Y., Wu, Z., Zhou, X., Zhou, Z., & Fan, W. (2006). Knowledge discovery in traditional Chinese medicine: State of the art and perspectives. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 38(3), 219–236.
Ferguson, G., Pérez-Llantada, C., & Plo, R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: A study of attitudes. World Englishes, 30(1), 41–59.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.
Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2004). A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, 61(3), 339–359.
Hsieh, W.-H., Chiu, W.-T., Lee, Y.-S., & Ho, Y.-S. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of patent ductus arteriosus treatments. Scientometrics, 60(2), 105–215.
Hussain, A., & Fatima, N. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of the ‘Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal (2006–2010)’. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 31. Available at http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31HF.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2015.
Lu, H., Song, Y., & Liu, J. (2013). The eastern cultural signature of traditional Chinese medicine: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Chinese Medicine, 4, 79.
Lv, P. H., Wang, G.-F., Wan, Y., Liu, J., Liu, Q., & Ma, F.-C. (2011). Bibliometric trend analysis on global graphene research. Scientometrics, 88(2), 399–419.
Michalopoulos, A., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. CHEST Journal, 128(6), 3993–3998.
Milanez, D. H., Schiavi, M., do Amaral, R., de Faria, J., & Gregolin, J. A. R. (2013). Development of carbon-based nanomaterials indicators using the analytical tools and data provided by the web of science database. Materials Research, 16(6), 1282–1293.
Rahman, M., Haque, T. L., & Fukui, T. (2005). Research articles published in clinical radiology journals: Trend of contribution from different countries 1. Academic Radiology, 12(7), 825–829.
Saragiotto, B. T., Costa, L., Oliveira, R. F., Lopes, A. D., Moseley, A. M., & Costa, L. O. (2014). Description of research design of articles published in four Brazilian physical therapy journals. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (AHEAD), 18(1), 56–62.
Sayers, E. W., Barrett, T., Benson, D. A., Bolton, E., Bryant, S. H., Canese, K., et al. (2011). Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(suppl 1), D38–D51.
Tägil, M., Geijer, M., Abramo, A., & Kopylov, P. (2013). Ten years’ experience with a pyrocarbon prosthesis replacing the proximal interphalangeal joint. A prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1753193413479527.
Uriona-Maldonado, M., dos Santos, R. N., & Varvakis, G. (2012). State of the art on the systems of innovation research: A bibliometrics study up to 2009. Scientometrics, 91(3), 977–996.
Wang, Y., & Xu, A. (2014). Zheng: A systems biology approach to diagnosis and treatments. Science, 346(6216), S13–S15.
Wheeler, D. L., Barrett, T., Benson, D. A., Bryant, S. H., Canese, K., Chetvernin, V., et al. (2007). Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(suppl 1), D5–D12.
Winston, W. L. (2011). Microsoft Excel 2010: Data analysis and business modeling. Microsoft Press.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the referees and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank the authors of the original studies included in this analysis. This work was supported, in part, by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 4152028), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grand No. 61170203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Y., Zhou, M., Deng, Q. et al. Bibliometric analysis for the literature of traditional Chinese medicine in PubMed. Scientometrics 105, 557–566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1686-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1686-3