Skip to main content
Log in

An evolutionary analysis of collaboration networks in scientometrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research area of scientometrics began during the second half of the nineteenth century. After decades of growth, the international field of scientometrics has become increasingly mature. This study intends to understand the evolution of the collaboration network in the field of scientometrics. The growth of the discipline is divided into three stages: the first period (1987–1996), the second period (1997–2006), and the third period (2007–2015). Macro-level, meso-level, and micro-level network measures across the time periods are compared. Macro-level analyses show that the degree distribution of the collaboration in each time span are consistent with power-law, and that both the average degree and average distance steadily increase with time. From the meso-level perspective, the increase of the number of clusters in the collaboration networks suggests the emergence of more collaborative fields in scientometrics. Moreover, the growth of the size of primary clusters demonstrates the expansion of the research fields and the collaboration range. Micro-level structure analyses identify the authors/researchers with high performance in raw degree measure, degree centrality measure, and betweenness measure, all of which are dynamic across different time spans. From three dimensions (raw degree, degree centrality, and betweenness centrality), the collaboration dominators are identified for each time span.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47–97. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the web of knowledge: The Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Börner, K., & Fang, S. (2013). Evolving collaboration networks in scientometrics in 1978–2010: A micro–macro analysis. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1051–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (Eds.). (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (2014th ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M. (2011). Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1992–2012. doi:10.1002/asi.21614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Springer: Netherlands.

  • Hou, H. (2006). Study on the evolution of scientometrics based on the scientific map. Retrieved from http://www.cnki.net/.

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics. Scientometics, 75(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, R., Wang, S., Scharnhorst, A., & Englebienne, G. (2015). Ariadne’s thread-interactive navigation in a world of networked information. doi:10.1145/2702613.2732781.

  • Milojević, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity? Scientometrics, 95(1), 141–157. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0861-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, B. M. (1969). Scientometrics. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. doi:10.1177/016555150202800601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, J. (2002). The research methodology of scientometrics. Beijing, China: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoepflin, U., & Glänzel, W. (2001). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics…and beyond? Scientometrics, 30, 376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (2002). The web of scientometrics: A statistical overview of the first 50 volumes of the journal. Scientometics, 53(1), 3–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, L., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R. A., & Liu, Z. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1599–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J. (2010). The advanced tutorial of scientometrics. Beijing, China: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuehua Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Zhao, R. An evolutionary analysis of collaboration networks in scientometrics. Scientometrics 107, 759–772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1857-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1857-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation