Abstract
Relying on the Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Citation Index databases, a bibliometric analysis of global studies on the genetically modified foods (GMF) in the last 20 years was conducted. We explored the knowledge foundations, research areas, authorships, spatiotemporal patterns, and the trendy. The GMF-related research maintains stable growth with established research teams and sufficient funds in the recent years. GMF-related research is a young field with a newly established intellectual base, and widely recognized as bio-science study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, European Food Research and Technology, Food and Chemical Toxicology were the most active journals in the field. H. Akiyama, R. Teshima, A. Hino and A. Cifuentes were the most prolific authors in GMF-related research. For countries, both the pro-GMF and anti-GMF countries have pushed relevant research, including USA, EU, and Japan. Considering the GMF as national non-traditional security issue, inter-institute collaborations were more visible than that of international collaborations. Through keyword analysis, we found that the trendy of GMF-related research has been shifted from a pure technological perspective to a combination of technology, food safety and public acceptance.
References
Bett, C., Ouma, J. O., & Groote, H. D. (2010). Perspectives of gatekeepers in the Kenyan food industry towards genetically modified food. Food Policy, 35(4), 332–340.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.
Cowan, T. (2010). Agricultural biotechnology: Background and recent issues. Congressional Research Service Reports. Paper 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/27. Accessed September 30, 2015.
Freedman, D. H. (2013). The truth about genetically modified food. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-truth-about-genetically-modified-food/.
Gaskell, G., Bauer, M., Durant, J., & Allum, N. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, 285(5426), 384–387.
Ho, Y. S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science. Current Science, 107(9), 1565–1572.
Huffman, M. D., Baldridge, A., Bloomfield, G. S., Colantonio, L. D., Prabhakaran, P., Ajay, V. S., et al. (2013). Global cardiovascular research output, citations, and collaborations: A time-trend, bibliometric analysis (1999–2008). Plos One, 8(12).
James, C., & Krattiger, A. F. (1996). Global review of the field testing and commercialization of transgenic plants, 1986 to 1995: The first decade of crop biotechnology (Vol. Briefs No. 1, p. 31). NY.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). In the democracies of DNA: Ontological uncertainty and political order in three states. New Genetics and Society, 24(2), 139–155. doi:10.1080/14636770500190864.
Jens Peter, A., Martin, B. G., Karen, D. R., Ulf-Henrik, M., Morgan, G. J., Hartmut, G., et al. (2015). Global myeloma research clusters, output, and citations: A bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis. PLoS One, 10(1), e0116966–e0116966.
Kuiper, H. A., Kleter, G. A., Noteborn, H. P., & Kok, E. J. (2001). Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant Journal for Cell & Molecular Biology, 27(6), 503–528.
Nicolaisen, J. (2010). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 267–268. (262).
Peng, Y., Lin, A., Wang, K., Liu, F., Zeng, F., & Yang, L. (2015). Global trends in DEM-related research from 1994 to 2013: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 347–366.
WHO Food, Genetically modified. http://www.who.int/topics/food_genetically_modified/en/. Accessed September 30, 2015.
Wikipedia Genetically modified food. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food. Accessed September 30, 2015.
Zhang, L., Wang, M. H., & Hu, J. (2010). A review of published wetland research, 1991–2008: Ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration. Ecological Engineering, 36(8), 973–980.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National 985 Project of Non-traditional Security at Huazhong University of Science and Technology and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71303085). The authors are grateful to the dedicated help from Pro. Avishag Gordon (Technion-Israel Institute of Technology), Ph.D. Candidate Yuling Peng (Wuhan University) and Tongchao Le (Fujian Academy of Forestry Sciences).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, W., Xu, X., Ming, C. et al. Surviving in the dispute: A bibliometric analysis of global GMF-related research, 1995–2014. Scientometrics 109, 359–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1995-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1995-1