Abstract
We investigated some factors that can affect the citation behavior in young scientific fields by using ethnobiology as a research model. In particular, we sought to assess the degree of insularity in the citations of scientific articles and whether this behavior varies across countries, continents and related areas of knowledge. In addition, we analyzed if researchers cite more scientific articles or gray literature in their publications and whether there is variation in this behavior among different continents and areas of knowledge. We also assessed citation behavior considering open and closed access journals. Scientific articles from four journals that relate to ethnobiology were selected; two are open access journals, and two are closed access journals. Overall, we found a general lack of insularity, but the analysis by country revealed the existence of this phenomenon in Brazil, the United States, India, Mexico, Spain and Turkey. Contrary to what the scientometric literature indicates, the scientific articles that were published in closed access journals are cited more often than the scientific articles that were published in open access journals. This citation behavior may relate to the better establishment of this type of journal in the ethnobiology field, which also had articles with a lower citation rate of gray literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberani, V., Castro Pietrangeli, P., & Mazza, A. M. (1990). The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78, 358–363.
Albuquerque, U. P. (2010). The tyranny of the impact factor: why do we still want to be subjugated? Rodriguésia, 61, 353–358.
Albuquerque, U., Ramos, M., & Medeiros, M. (2011). Experiences of ethnobotanists with publication: a first approach. BioScience, 61, 706–712.
Albuquerque, U., Silva, J., Campos, J., Sousa, R., Silva, T., & Alves, R. (2013). The current status of ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 9(1), 72. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-9-72.
Alvarenga, L. (1998). Bibliometria e arqueologia do saber de Michel Foucault: traços de identidade teórico-metodológica. Ciência da informação, 27(3), 253–261.
Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: how to undertake a bibliometric study (pp. 141–143). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Atchison, A., & Bull, J. (2015). Will open access get me cited? An analysis of the efficacy of open access publishing in political science. PS Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 129–137. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001668.
Ayres, M., Ayres, M., Ayres, D. L., & Santos, A. S. (2007). BioEstat 5.3: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biomédicas. Belém do Pará: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá.
Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine,. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150.
Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2010). Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 872–880.
Chadwell, F., & Sutton, S. C. (2014). The future of open access and library publishing. New Library World, 115(5), 225–236. doi:10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0049.
Craig, I., Plume, A., McVeigh, M., Princle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001.
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 337, a568. doi:10.1136/bmj.a568.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
Frandsen, T. F. (2009). The effects of open access on un-published documents: a case study of economics working papers. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002.
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One, 5(10), e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.
Hanazaki, N. (2015). Why are we so attached to the “ethno” prefix in Brazil? Scientometrics, 103(2), 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1540-7.
Hunn, E. (2007). Ethnobiology in four phases. Journal of Ethnobiology, 27, 1–10.
Krampen, G. (2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4.
Ladle, R. J., Todd, P. A., & Malhado, A. C. M. (2012). Assessing insularity in global science. Scientometrics, 93(3), 745–750. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0703-z.
Lancaster, F. W., Lee, S.-Y. K., & Diluvio, C. (1990). Does place of publication influence citation behavior? Scientometrics, 19(3–4), 239–244. doi:10.1007/BF02095350.
Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521.
Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438. doi:10.1641/0006-3568.
Lortie, C. J., Aarssen, L. W., Budden, A. E., Koricheva, J. K., Leimu, R., & Tregenza, T. (2007). Publication bias and merit in ecology. Oikos, 116, 1247–1253.
Nightingale, J., & Marshall, G. (2013). Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 429–436. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2013.02.005.
Pelzer, N. L., & Wiese, W. H. (2003). Bibliometric study of grey literature in core veterinary medical journals. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 91(4), 434–441.
Ramos, M. A., Melo, J. G., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2012). Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany. Scientometrics, 92(3), 711–719. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4.
Santangelo, G., & Bramanti, L. (2006). Ecology through Time, an Overview. Revista di Biologia, 99, 395–424.
Seymour, D. J. (2010). In the trenches around the ivory tower: introduction to black-and-white issues about the grey literature. Archaeologies, 6(2), 226–232. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9130-z.
Shah, T. A., Gul, S., & Gaur, R. C. (2015). Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of library and information science. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(4), 458–468. doi:10.1108/AJIM-10-2014-0134.
Thompson, L. A. (2001). Grey literature in engineering. Science & Technology Libraries, 19(3–4), 57–73. doi:10.1300/J122v19n03_05.
Tomaszewski, R., Poulin, S., & MacDonald, K. I. (2013). Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: opportunities and outreach for librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.008.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to CNPq for the productivity Grant awarded to UPA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campos, J.L.A., Sobral, A., Silva, J.S. et al. Insularity and citation behavior of scientific articles in young fields: the case of ethnobiology. Scientometrics 109, 1037–1055 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2067-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2067-2