Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media platform makes more and more influence on academic communication with the development of web 2.0 + technology. Wechat (WeiXin in Chinese) is one of the social media tools based on social media platform to publicly communicate about research developments and finds for academics. The development of Wechat not only enriches the development of social media tools but also provides a new perspective and method for the evaluation of academic influence. The traditional metrics are not necessarily immediate feedback or reproducible, which are based on citation methods of evaluating and filtering articles. Wechat as one of the popular social media tools, which can provide possibility to make impact evaluation as a novel and promising approach to supplement the traditional citation metrics. Wechat not only can support the social influence for non-academic findings, but also provide academic impact of scholarships. The proposed Wechat index may be a useful and timely metric to measure uptake of research findings with public in real time. In short, Wechat is greatly supplement the offline methods of research dissemination and networking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adie, E., & Roe, W. (2013). Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa, M. (2012). The changing role of librarians in the digital world: Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librarians. Electronic Library, 30(4), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., & Sompel, H. V. D., et al. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt, R., & Roemer, R. C. (2013). Institutional altmetrics and academic libraries. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, T., & Harnad, S., et al. (2006). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collection, T. A. (2012). The altmetrics collection. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coursaris, C. K., & Osch, W. V. (2014). A scientometric analysis of social media research (2004–2011). Scientometrics, 101(1), 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., & Jacob, E. K., et al. (2009). Perspectives on social tagging. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2388–2401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, M. (2013). The influence of Twitter on the academic environment. Social Media and the New Academic Environment Pedagogical Challenges, 343(343), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdt, M., & Nagarajan, A., et al. (2016). Altmetrics: An analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1117–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, M. (2013). What can article-level metrics do for you? PLoS Biology, 11(10), 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gsdata (2017). Qingbo index. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from http://www.gsdata.cn/.

  • Guo, C., & Shim, J. P., et al. (2010). Social network services in China: An integrated model of centrality, trust, and technology acceptance. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(2), 76–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harinarayana, N. S., & Raju, N. V. (2010). Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Scientometrics, 102(3), 16569–16572.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C., et al. (2001). The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains: How many databases are needed? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), 1242–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, I., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2012). Students’ perceptions of academic use of social networking sites: A survey of university students in Bangladesh. Information Development, 28(3), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. M., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M. J., & Eichhorn, G., et al. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, T. N. V., & Moed, H. F. (2005). Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Library, G. (2014). The application of Wechat in the library. Agriculture Network Information, 2, 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linh, N. C. (2008). A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries. Library Hi Tech, 26(4), 630–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2008). Engaging users: The future of academic library web sites. College & Research Libraries, 69(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. L., Xu, Y. Q., Wu, H., Chen, S. S., & Guo, J. J. (2013). Correlation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: Dimensions and structure. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11), e259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, D., & McKinley, D. (2016). Social media strategies for dynamic library service development. The Electronic Library, 34(1), 172–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugan, K., & Lingaiah, V., et al. (2013). Next generation library services using social networking tools in academic libraries. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 4(11), 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7).

  • Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.

  • Shi, R., & Si, L., et al. (2011). An investigation and analysis of the application of Web 2.0 in Chinese university libraries. The Electronic Library, 44(5), 1508–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2009). The journal impact factor and other bibliometrics: Do they have a role in subscription selection? Health Inform, 18(2), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1075–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Kang, Q., et al. (2015). Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R., et al. (2014). How well developed are Altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of `alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Yang, Z. Y., et al. (2016). Subject librarian services in medical libraries based on WeChat. Journal of Medical Informatics, 37(2), 74–76.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R., & Wei, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of open source software: An altmetrics perspective. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1017–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Zhu, Q. (2016). The application of social media in outreach of academic libraries’ resources and services: A case study on WeChat. Library Hi Tech, 34(4), 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Shen yang from gsdata.cn for help and support in providing the data. This work is supported by National Social Science Foundation in China (Grant No. 16BTQ055). Finally, we thank Wolfgang Glänzel for comments and two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Rongying Zhao & Mingkun Wei

  2. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Rongying Zhao & Mingkun Wei

Authors
  1. Rongying Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingkun Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingkun Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Wei, M. Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective. Scientometrics 112, 1777–1791 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2439-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2439-2

Keywords