Skip to main content
Log in

Inspecting the Achilles heel: a quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite numerous attempts by academics from many disciplines and various regional contexts, there is still no agreement on a definition of family business. Subjecting 258 definitions found in work published over the past 50 years (1964–2013) to the bibliometric techniques of consensus and co-word analysis to uncover intellectual structure, we identify the key terms used to underpin the concept of family business and to track the progress made towards consensus on its definition. We find an emergence of definitional key terms by which scholars attempt to clarify the concepts of family and family business, and growing agreement of what criteria should be met in framing a definition. This study contributes to the literature by offering a synthesis of what constitutes a family business, as well as a systematic and quantitative analysis of its evolution over a half century of research. It also shows how bibliometric tools can be used to shed light on fields where definitional ambiguity persists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allouche, J., Amann, B., Jaussaud, J., & Kurashina, T. (2008). The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus nonfamily businesses in Japan: A matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review, 21(4), 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem1. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babicky, J. (1987). Consulting to the family business. Journal of Management Consulting, 3(4), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmes, L. B., & Hershon, S. A. (1976). Transferring power in the family business. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1975). The development of organisation structure in the family firm. Journal of General Management, 3(1), 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basco, R. (2013). The family’s effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 42–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basco, R., & Pérez, M. J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically: Evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22(1), 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the international association for the advancement of artificial intelligence. conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 361–362). Available at http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154.

  • Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Guzmán-Parra, V. F., & Quintana-García, C. (2011). Evolución de la literatura sobre empresa familiar como disciplina científica. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14(2), 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, A., Lampel, J., Henderson, S., & Watkins, D. (2009). Exploring alternative strategic management paradigms in high-growth ethnic and non-ethnic family firms. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Basu, P. (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 43(3), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., Welsch, H., Astrachan, J. H., & Pistrui, D. (2002). Family business research: The evolution of an academic field. Family Business Review, 15(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (1993). Human ecology theory. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 419–448). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Suárez, M. K., & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2015). Board composition and performance in Spanish non-listed family firms: The influence of type of directors and CEO duality. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Information (International Social Science Council), 22(2), 191–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, C. M., & Ireland, R. D. (2013). Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1399–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., Van Essen, M., Gedajlovic, E. R., & Heugens, P. P. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, J., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2010). A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Chen, X., & Cheng, Q. (2008). Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 499–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Hofer, C. W., & Boulton, W. B. (1988). Toward a system for classifying business strategies. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. R. (1953). Management succession in small and growing enterprises. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. A. (1969). Kenricks in hardware: A family business, 1791–1966. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cucculelli, M., Mannarino, L., Pupo, V., & Ricotta, F. (2014). Owner-management, firm age, and productivity in Italian family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabic, M., González-Loureiro, M., & Furrer, O. (2014). Research on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Key approaches and new avenues. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. S., & Harveston, P. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12(4), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Sharma, P., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. H. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Debicki, B. J., Matherne, C. F., III, Kellermanns, F. W., & Chrisman, J. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium: An overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Distelberg, B., & Sorenson, R. L. (2009). Updating systems concepts in family businesses: A focus on values, resource flows, and adaptability. Family Business Review, 22(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelley, R. G. (1964). The family business. Harvard Business Review, 42, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreux, D. R., IV. (1990). Financing family business: Alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3(3), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., & Mortensen, S. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and family business in a hostile environment: The case of Lithuania. Family Business Review, 18(3), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. P., Pinto, C. F., & Serra, F. R. (2014). The transaction costs theory in international business research: a bibliometric study over three decades. Scientometrics, 97(2), 1899–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. A., & Sveen, J. (1991). Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors. Family Business Review, 4(2), 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. A., & Vilaseca, A. (1996). Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9(4), 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1010–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., Peng, M. W., & Shapiro, D. (2011). Corporate governance and Asian companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. L., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family business. Family Business Review, 1(4), 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. C. (2009). Ethnicity effects on the family business entrepreneurial process: Commentary and extension. Family Business Review, 22(3), 293–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Linares, R., Sarkar, S., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2017). How has the family firm literature addressed its heterogeneity through classification systems? An integrated analysis. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1–2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Galve-Górriz, C. (2016). The influence of family control on decisions regarding the specialization and diversification of business groups. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. G., & Boulton, W. R. (1984). Balancing the “family” and the “business” in family business. Business Horizons, 27(2), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. E., Breitkreuz, R. S., & James, A. E. (2013). When family members are also business owners: Is entrepreneurship good for families? Family Relations, 62(3), 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Bibliometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: One or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansberg, I., Perrow, E. L., & Rogolsky, S. (1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Tan, F. (2001). Growth of Chinese family enterprises in Singapore. Family Business Review, 14(1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review, 8(2), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A. (2008). Two sides of a one-sided phenomenon: Conceptualizing the family business and business family as a Möbius strip. Family Business Review, 21(3), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A., Pearson, A., & Litchfield, S. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25(1), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Fernández, M. C., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and family firm research: A bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 622–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzi, C. (2011). Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(3), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughy, D., Walker, M., Henderson, G., & Chandra, M. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Challenge versus advantage in family business. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. J., & Rice, A. K. (1967). Systems of Organizations. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgado-Armenteros, E. M., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Torres-Ruiz, F. J., & Cobo, M. J. (2015). Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 519–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2011). Sustainable development: The role of network communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (Eds.). (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (Vol. 27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011).The future of families to 2030. Projections, policy challenges and policy options. A synthesis report. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/futures/49093502.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2012.

  • Olson, P. D., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, M. J., Basco, R., García-Tenorio, J., Giménez, J., & Sánchez, I. (2007). Fundamentos en la Dirección de la Empresa Familiar. Emprendedor, Empresa y Familia. Madrid: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri, A., & Peruffo, E. (2016). Knowledge spillovers from FDI: A critical review from the international business perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A., Bar-Yosef, S., & Dekker, H. (2014). Accounting research in family firms: Theoretical and empirical challenges. European Accounting Review, 23(3), 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Stewart, M., Smith, P., & Barron, A. E. (2010). Aninvestigation of distance education in North American research literature using co-word analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2012). Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: A co-word analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 162–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C., Mik, L., Anderson, R. M., & Johnson, P. A. (1985). The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenges entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routhausen, T. (1999). Family in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 817–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., & Gedajlovic, E. R. (2010). Whither family business? Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, M. C., & Astrachan, J. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy—A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997a). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997b). A review and annotated bibliography of the family business literature. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chua, J. H. (2013). Asian family enterprises and family business research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Hoy, F., Astrachan, J. H., & Koiranen, M. (2007). The practice-driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. D. (2009). East Africa: Extended families with many rights. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1239–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, R. L., Goodpaster, K. E., Hedberg, P. R., & Yu, A. (2009). The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance: An exploratory test. Family Business Review, 22(3), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4), 709–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. H. (1986). Inside the family-held business: A practical guide for entrepreneurs and their advisors. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topalli, M., & Ivanaj, S. (2016). Mapping the evolution of the impact of economic transition on Central and Eastern European enterprises: A co-word analysis. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 744–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability and family leadership. San Francisco, IL: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, M. S. (1994). Theoretical foundations for family-owned business: A conceptual and research-based paradigm. Family Business Review, 7(1), 3–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, J. M., Kraus, S., Filser, M., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Mapping the field of family business research: Past trends and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(1), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, C. S., & Tsai, L. C. (2008). The sensitivity of compensation to social capital: Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family business groups. Journal of Business Research, 61(4), 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remedios Hernández-Linares.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Linares, R., Sarkar, S. & Cobo, M.J. Inspecting the Achilles heel: a quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions. Scientometrics 115, 929–951 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2702-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2702-1

Keywords

Navigation