Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship among international collaboration, number of papers and number of citations from an economic perspective. It analyzes the number of international collaboration papers and their citations according to different international economic collaboration types, the number of countries at different economic levels, and the economic situations of first or corresponding authors. This study analyzes international collaboration papers listed in Web of Science from 2011 to 2015, published in the field of Public, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to different international collaboration types, results show that the subset of international collaboration with the same economic level accounts for the highest percentage, especially the type of H&H, and there are significant differences in average citations among different collaboration types, the type of H&M&L has the highest value (11.21 ± 15.72). According to the number of countries at different economic levels, results show that papers published by ≥ 3 countries account for the highest percentage most of the time in different collaboration types. In general, there are positive correlations between the number of countries and citations, but there are no significant differences according to the number of low income countries in different types except H&M&L. According to economic situations of first or corresponding authors, results show that papers initiated by high income countries always account for the highest percentage over past 5 years, and there are positive correlations between the economic situations of first or corresponding authors and citations in different types except H&M. (H: high income countries, M: middle income countries, L: low income countries).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2004). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometris, 52(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & de Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & De Rouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2013). Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95(2), 689–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H., & Whitney, D. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Ut, V. Le. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puuska, H. M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different OECD fields. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research result. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2015). Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact. Scientometrics, 105(2), 843–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71303259).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinying An.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ni, P., An, X. Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics 116, 863–877 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9

Keywords

Navigation