Abstract
This paper analyzes the relationship among international collaboration, number of papers and number of citations from an economic perspective. It analyzes the number of international collaboration papers and their citations according to different international economic collaboration types, the number of countries at different economic levels, and the economic situations of first or corresponding authors. This study analyzes international collaboration papers listed in Web of Science from 2011 to 2015, published in the field of Public, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to different international collaboration types, results show that the subset of international collaboration with the same economic level accounts for the highest percentage, especially the type of H&H, and there are significant differences in average citations among different collaboration types, the type of H&M&L has the highest value (11.21 ± 15.72). According to the number of countries at different economic levels, results show that papers published by ≥ 3 countries account for the highest percentage most of the time in different collaboration types. In general, there are positive correlations between the number of countries and citations, but there are no significant differences according to the number of low income countries in different types except H&M&L. According to economic situations of first or corresponding authors, results show that papers initiated by high income countries always account for the highest percentage over past 5 years, and there are positive correlations between the economic situations of first or corresponding authors and citations in different types except H&M. (H: high income countries, M: middle income countries, L: low income countries).



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2004). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.
Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometris, 52(3), 365–377.
Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84.
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.
Glänzel, W., & de Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54(1), 75–89.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & De Rouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.
Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2013). Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95(2), 689–716.
Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
Kruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621.
Mann, H., & Whitney, D. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Ut, V. Le. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1035–1051.
Puuska, H. M., Muhonen, R., & Leino, Y. (2014). International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different OECD fields. Scientometrics, 98(2), 823–839.
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.
Van Raan, A. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research result. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.
Wang, L., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2015). Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact. Scientometrics, 105(2), 843–862.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71303259).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, P., An, X. Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics 116, 863–877 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2784-9