Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sleeping beauties with no prince based on the co-citation criterion

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In science, a sleeping beauty (SB) refers to a highly cited paper that initially remains unnoticed for several years after publication. It is generally recognized that each SB is awoken by princes, in the form of other papers that cite the SB. Investigations have shown that one feature of a prince is that it has a considerable number of co-citations with the SB. In the present study, we applied a method to screen for princes from among papers citing the SB based on the number of co-citations in the Web of Science and identified four SBs that were awoken without a prince based on the co-citation criterion. There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon. The first is that some SBs may not need a prince to attract the attention of other academics. The authors of three of the four abovementioned SBs were Nobel laureates, and their work was well known in their respective fields. The papers had slept for a long period because their work was ahead of its time. The long period of sleep is a reflection of the authors’ high academic level and degree of insight. The other potential explanation is that princes do not have to be co-cited with SBs. Our findings demonstrate a significant deficiency in the previous criteria relating to princes based on co-citations. Thus, new criteria are required to identify princes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134(3479), 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On sleeping beauties, princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76(2), 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry, L., Renn, J., & Stachel, J. (1997). Belated decision in the Hilbert–Einstein priority dispute. Science, 278(5341), 1270–1273.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a “sellbydate”? A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, R., Roy, A., Chakraborty, T., & Ghosh, S. (2017). Sleeping beauties in Computer Science: Characterization and early identification. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1645–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & Wu, Y. (2016). A bibliometric framework for identifying “princes” who wake up the “sleeping beauty” in challenge-type scientific discoveries. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(1), 50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science. In 16th International conference on scientometrics & informetrics (pp. 148–157). Wuhan, China.

  • Einstein, A. (1915). The field equations of gravity. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.), 2, 844–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarese, L., & Ford, H. (2005). Supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei: Past, present and future research. Space Science Reviews, 116(3–4), 523–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition—why? Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 488–493. (also in Current Contents, 21, 5–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1989). Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: Citation frequency analysis aids the search for case histories. Current Contents, 23, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1990). More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy. Essays of an Information Scientist, 13, 68–74. (also in Current Contents, 9, 3–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorry, P., & Aichouchi, A. E. (2017). Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review: A case study of Judah Folkman hypothesis on angiogenesis. In 16 th International conference on scientometrics & informetrics (pp. 778–786). Wuhan, China.

  • Hartley, J., & Ho, Y.-S. (2017). Who woke the sleeping beauties in psychology? Scientometrics, 112(2), 1065–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y.-S., & Hartley, J. (2017). Sleeping beauties in psychology. Scientometrics, 110(1), 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). Propagation of electrical signals along giant nerve fibres. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B—Biological Sciences, 140(899), 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426–7431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkaldy, J. S. (1992). Spontaneous evolution of spatiotemporal patterns in materials. Reports on Progress in Physics, 55(6), 723–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2014). Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”. Scientometrics, 100(2), 595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Shi, D. (2016). Sleeping beauties in genius work: When were they awakened? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 432–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Shi, D., Zhao, S. X., & Ye, F. Y. (2014). A study of the ‘‘heartbeat spectra’’ for ‘‘sleeping beauties’’. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92(3), 795–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, C., Sun, J., Pei, L., & Ding, Y. (2016). Measuring delayed recognition for papers: Uneven weightedsummation and total citations. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1153–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics, 93(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobelprize. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1963/hodgkin-facts.html, or https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1963/huxley-facts.html. Accessed April 5, 2018.

  • Ostwald, W. (1900). On the assumed isomerism of red and yellow mercury oxide and the surface-tension of solid bodies. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische ChemieE–Stochiometrie Und Verwandtschaftslehre, 34(4), 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, A. L. (1939). The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Physical Review, 56(10), 978–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P. (1918). Estimation of size and internal structure of colloidal particles by means of Röntgen rays. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 2, 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Min, C., & Li, J. (2016). A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles. Scientometrics, 107(2), 745–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A. A. C., Vieira, P. C., & Abreu, A. P. (2017). Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies. Scientometrics, 110(2), 541–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2015). Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Lloyd_Hodgkin. Accessed April 5, 2018.

  • Ye, F. Y., & Bornmann, L. (2018). “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China

    ZhangJian Zong & XuanZhen Liu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Hui Fang

Authors
  1. ZhangJian Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. XuanZhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XuanZhen Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zong, Z., Liu, X. & Fang, H. Sleeping beauties with no prince based on the co-citation criterion. Scientometrics 117, 1841–1852 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2932-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2932-2

Keywords