Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Two decades of information systems: a bibliometric review

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information systems (IS) is a vital research area in both science and engineering, whose revolutions in terms of theories, techniques, and applications promote the evolution of human society. At the same time, the complexity and dynamics of IS raise the challenge for exploring the topic in detail. In this paper, we present a quantitative analysis on bibliographic dataset to reveal the evolution of information systems in 2 decades (1996–2015). We select 39,767 papers published in 8 top-tier journals and conferences between 1996 and 2015 and explore the anatomy from manifold. We find that IS is experiencing the sustainable growth phase in terms of increased productivity, impact, and collaboration. The field is benefited from collaborative, open-minded, and in-depth efforts evidenced from the growing number of co-authors per paper, the continual declining of self-citation rate, and increased reference age, respectively. By applying topic detection models on paper titles, abstracts, and keywords, we infer the representative topics and research directions, which can also reveal the research landscape within this field. Finally, we measure the temporal trends of topics and identify the innovative years in the 20 years’ development history of IS. These discoveries can benefit not only researchers in terms of promoting understanding of the entire field, but also governments for funding agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/microsoft-academic-graph/.

  2. http://aisnet.org/?SeniorScholarBasket.

  3. http://www.core.edu.au.

  4. http://portal.core.edu.au/conf-ranks/?search=0806&by=for&source=CORE2018&sort=arank&page=1.

References

  • Arun, R., Suresh, V., Madhavan, C. V., & Murthy, M. N. (2010). On finding the natural number of topics with latent dirichlet allocation: Some observations. In Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 391–402). Springer.

  • Bai, X., Liu, H., Zhang, F., Ning, Z., Kong, X., Lee, I., et al. (2017). An overview on evaluating and predicting scholarly article impact. Information, 8(3), 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., Zhang, F., Hou, J., Lee, I., Kong, X., Tolba, A., et al. (2018). Quantifying the impact of scholarly papers based on higher-order weighted citations. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0193192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., Xia, T., Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Tang, S. (2009). A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing, 72(7–9), 1775–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, A., Paredes, H., & Fonseca, B. (2018). Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW. Scientometrics, 114(1), 31–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finin, T., Cane, M., Sleeman, J., Halem, M., et al. (2016). Dynamic topic modeling to infer the influence of research citations on IPCC assessment reports. In Big data challenges, research, and technologies in the earth and planetary sciences workshop, IEEE int. conf. on big data.

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., et al. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearst, M. A., Dumais, S. T., Osuna, E., Platt, J., & Scholkopf, B. (1998). Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 13(4), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, T. (2017). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In ACM SIGIR forum (Vol. 51, pp. 211–218). ACM.

  • Liu, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., Bai, X., Wang, L., Qing, Q., et al. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the 21st century. IEEE Access, 6, 34403–34421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, G. H., Eickhoff, S. B., Fox, P. T., & Yeo, B. T. (2016). Collapsed variational bayesian inference of the author-topic model: Application to large-scale coordinate-based meta-analysis. In 2016 international workshop on pattern recognition in neuroimaging (PRNI) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  • Savov, P., Jatowt, A., & Nielek, R. (2017). Towards understanding the evolution of the WWW conference. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion (pp. 835–836). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

  • Sinatra, R., Deville, P., Szell, M., Wang, D., & Barabási, A.-L. (2015). A century of physics. Nature Physics, 11(10), 791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A., Shen, Z., Song, Y., Ma, H., Eide, D., Hsu, B.-J. P., & Wang, K. (2015). An overview of microsoft academic service (MAS) and applications. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web (pp. 243–246). ACM.

  • Sun, L., & Yin, Y. (2017). Discovering themes and trends in transportation research using topic modeling. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, 77, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Chen, L., Dai, Y., & Chen, G. (2017). A dynamic topic model and matrix factorization-based travel recommendation method exploiting ubiquitous data. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(8), 1933–1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2010). Weighted citation: An indicator of an article’s prestige. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1635–1643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., & Hsu, W. H. (2016). Hdpauthor: A new hybrid author-topic model using latent dirichlet allocation and hierarchical dirichlet processes. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web (pp. 619–624). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

  • Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory for Ubiquitous Network and Service Software of Liaoning Province, School of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116620, China

    Jiaying Liu, Jiahao Tian, Xiangjie Kong & Feng Xia

  2. School of Information Technology and Mathematical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Ivan Lee

Authors
  1. Jiaying Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiahao Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangjie Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ivan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Feng Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JL, FX, IL, and XK designed the research; JT performed the experiments; XK and FX analyzed the data; JL and IL wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Xia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Tian, J., Kong, X. et al. Two decades of information systems: a bibliometric review. Scientometrics 118, 617–643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2974-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2974-5

Keywords