Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the intellectual structure of cloud patents using non-exhaustive overlaps

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing advanced information technology to identify the intellectual structure of patents is important for the fast-emerging cloud computing industry; however, related literature is limited. Because the existing three categories of cloud computing business mode are partially overlapped, the customary SPI model as a basis for patent analysis is unable to grasp the development status of cloud computing correctly. The aims of this study are to obtain clustering of cloud patent with overlapping claims and to identify the intellectual structure of different research themes in the development of cloud computing. This study first proposes an ontology-based compound retrieval policy to retrieve three non-overlapped cloud patents. We then propose a new overlapping cluster algorithm using the patents with the highest degree centralities as the initial central points for clustering, and utilizing the Taguchi and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution methods for integrating the clustering quality-related indices. Based on the database of the three overlapped clusters of cloud computing patents, we propose a group technology-based co-word analysis, incorporating with the visual methods of social network analysis and multivariate analysis, to investigate the R&D themes in each service mode of cloud computing. Based on the analysis results, technologies related to computer-readable storage medium and computer program are of particular interest to the SaaS enterprises. The virtual machine technologies are the major development directions of PaaS enterprises, and virtual computing environment has gained many attentions from the IaaS enterprises. The proposed method for exploring the intellectual structure, as well as the analyzed results for unveiling the development status of cloud computing and the co-opetition relationship between companies, can provide valuable references for cloud-related companies to make their R&D management strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, T. (2016). Measuring technology maturity: Operationalizing information from patents, Scientific Publications, and the Web. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batsyn, M., Bychkov, I., Goldengorin, B., Pardalos, P., & Sukhov, P. (2013). Pattern-based heuristic for the cell formation problem in group technology. In B. Goldengorin, V. Kalyagin, & P. Pardalos (Eds.), Models, algorithms, and technologies for network analysis (pp. 11–50). New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert, P., Robinson, P.A., & Blatman, P. (2009). Cloud computing Forecasting change. Deloitte Report.

  • Chattopadhyay, M., Chattopadhyay, S., & Dan, P. K. (2011). Machine-part cell formation through visual decipherable clustering of self-organizing map. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(9–12), 1019–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. L., & Hu, H. L. (2006). An overlapping cluster algorithm to provide non-exhaustive clustering. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 762–780.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Q. (2017). Cloud service performance evaluation: Status, challenges, and opportunities—A survey from the system modeling perspective. Digital Communications and Networks, 3(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2012). Categorical attribute based centrality: E–I and G–F centrality. Social Networks, 34(4), 562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., Tong, J., Mao, J., Bohn, R., Messina J., Badger, L, & Leaf D. (2011). NIST cloud computing reference architecture. National Institute of Standards and Technology. SP 500–292.

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, T., & Sim, K.M., (2010). An ontology-enhanced cloud service discovery system. In International multi conference of engineers and computer scientists (IMEC 2010), Hong Kong (pp. 644–649).

  • Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. Y. (2016). Patent network analysis of cloud computing by text mining. Journal of Technology, 31(2), 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. Y., & Hsu, Hung-Tu. (2017). Technology-function matrix based network analysis of cloud computing. Scientometrics, 113(1), 17–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. Y., & Siao, S. T. (2016). Development of an integrated bionic design system. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(2), 310–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., & Wang, H. L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Z. (2011). Cloud computing for enterprise architectures: Concepts, principles and approaches (pp. 3–19). London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (Ed.) (2018). Multidimensional scaling. In Modern psychometrics with R (pp. 257–287). Cham: Springer.

  • Staab, S., & Studer, R. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook on ontologies. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taghaboni-Dutta, F., Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., & Wu, H. Y. (2009). An exploratory RFID patent analysis. Management Research News, 32(12), 1163–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappey, C. V., Trappey, A. J. C., & Wu, C. Y. (2010). Clustering patents using non-exhaustive overlaps. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(2), 162–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong, Q. J., Shen, H. Z., Yuan, Q. J., Hu, X. W., Hou, Z. P., & Deng, S. G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong-Chang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, JY., Chen, RC. Exploring the intellectual structure of cloud patents using non-exhaustive overlaps. Scientometrics 121, 739–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03219-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03219-4

Keywords

Navigation