Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics of collaboration network community and exploratory innovation: the moderation of knowledge networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have explored the effects of network structures on organization’s exploratory innovation from different perspectives. However, few studies focus on the network community, and there still exists a possible tension on the relationship between network community and organization’s exploratory innovation. In an attempt to make theoretical and empirical contributions to the literature, this study addresses the above research gap by focusing on the dynamics of the network community, and developed a research model that explains how the dynamics of network community affect organization’s exploratory innovation. Furthermore, organizations are not only embedded in the collaboration network, but also in the knowledge network, and we further proposed that the configuration of organizational knowledge network has a moderating effect on the above relationships. We mainly focused on the network cohesion of organizational knowledge network and divided it into global cohesion and local cohesion. With the patent data of smartphone collaboration network from year 2004 to 2017, we empirically examined our hypotheses. The estimation results verified the inverted-U-shaped relationship between dynamics of network community and organization’s exploratory innovation. Furthermore, global cohesion of focal organization’s knowledge network moderates the process in the way that when it is at high level, organization’s exploratory innovation can benefit more from a moderate level of dynamics of network community. Nevertheless, local cohesion moderates the process in the way that when it is at low level, organization’s exploratory innovation can benefit more from a moderate level of dynamics of network community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. K., Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2013). Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics, 95(1), 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40(3), 292–299.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choe, H., & Lee, D. H. (2013). The structure and change of the research collaboration network in korea (2000–2011): Network analysis of joint patents. Scientometrics, 111(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemser, G., Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Wijnberg, N. J. (1996). The dynamics of inter-firm networks in the course of the industry life cycle: The role of appropriability. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 8(4), 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A., & Rosenkopf, L. (2015). Perspective—Shrouded in structure: Challenges and opportunities for a friction-based view of network research. Organization Science, 26(2), 622–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 450–454.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Na, L. (2016). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy, 45(1), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guler, I., & Nerkar, A. (2012). The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 33(5), 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanaki, N., Nakajima, R., & Ogura, Y. (2010). The dynamics of R&D network in the IT industry. Research Policy, 39(3), 386–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Kim, W. (2017). The knowledge network dynamics in a mobile ecosystem: A patent citation analysis. Scientometrics, 111(2), 717–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. H. (2011). The effects of innovation alliance on network structure and density of cluster. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 299–305.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Wang, J., & Ji, D. (2011). Network characteristics, absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(2), 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Xie, Y., & Wu, M. (2015). How latecomers innovate through technology modularization: Evidence from China’s Shanzhai industry. Innovation, 17(2), 266–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu, Y., Liu, Q., He, B., & Nie, J. (2017). Structural embeddedness and innovation diffusion: The moderating role of industrial technology grouping. Scientometrics, 111(2), 889–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Bagherzadeh, M. (2015). A review of interorganizational collaboration dynamics. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1338–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, V., & Nesta, L. (1999). What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb? International Journal of Technology Management, 18(3), 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moliner, L. A., Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Puelles, P. G. D. (2017). Understanding scientific communities: A social network approach to collaborations in talent management research. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 69(2), 026113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Yoon, J. (2014). Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&D. Scientometrics, 98(2), 853–890.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. (2005). Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1028–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, J. (1996). The value of international patent rights. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman, N., & Saives, A. L. (2010). Indirect networks: An intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35(2), 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell, T. (2013). Is the European R&D network homogeneous? Distinguishing relevant network communities using graph theoretic and spatial interaction modelling approaches. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1283–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. V., Sick, N., & Leker, J. (2015). How to measure technological distance in collaborations: The case of electric mobility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 97, 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytch, M., Tatarynowicz, A., & Gulati, R. (2012). Toward a theory of extended contact: The incentives and opportunities for bridging across network communities. Organization Science, 23(6), 1658–1681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation capabilities in high technology firms: A multi-source multi-context examination. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 672–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. H., & Hsu, L. C. (2014). Building exploration and exploitation in the high-tech industry: The role of relationship learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(1), 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L., & Dang, X. (2017). Study on the emergence of technological innovation network community structure and effect on ambidexterity innovation in asymmetric perspective. Operations Research and Management Science, 26(10), 188–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Jian, L., & Xin, Z. (2017). Exploring new knowledge through research collaboration: The moderation of the global and local cohesion of knowledge networks. Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-10017-19614-10968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2018a). Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 244–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2018b). How multiple networks help in creating knowledge: Evidence from alternative energy patents. Scientometrics, 115(1), 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yayavaram, S., & Ahuja, G. (2008). Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang, J. (2018). Structural holes, exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation. Management Decision, 56(8), 1682–1695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Duan, H., & Zhou, J. (2017). Network stability, connectivity and innovation output. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., & Tang, C. (2018). How R&D partner diversity influences innovation performance: An empirical study in the nano-biopharmaceutical field. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Zhang, H., & Wu, W. (2019). Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork. Scientometrics, 119(2), 657–685.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number, 71871182, 71471146, 71501158], Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [grant number, 3102018JCC013], Shaanxi Provincial Soft Science Research Program [grant number, 2019KRM158].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, People’s Republic of China

    Jingbei Wang & Naiding Yang

Authors
  1. Jingbei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naiding Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingbei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Yang, N. Dynamics of collaboration network community and exploratory innovation: the moderation of knowledge networks. Scientometrics 121, 1067–1084 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03235-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03235-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation