Skip to main content
Log in

An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education plays a significant role in economic growth and social development. However, the uneven development of higher education in China has become an important factor restricting its overall progress. Traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models used by previous studies are deterministic and susceptible to the impacts of measurement errors and the omission of unobserved but potentially relevant variables, which we referred to as environmental variables latter. To address both of these drawbacks, we develop and implement a three-stage DEA model to examine the efficiency of China’s mainland 31 provinces’ Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in 2016, which fills the gap in the efficiency evaluation of HEIs in all provinces of China. The “real” efficiency about management performance of each province’s HEIs is obtained and decomposed after the impacts of environmental variables and random errors are eliminated. Lastly, relevant policy suggestions are given on how to improve the efficiency of each province’s HEIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201707/t20170710_309042.html.

References

  • Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review,22(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics,6(1), 21–37.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., & Lavoie, F. F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation,27(5), 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science,30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., & Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research,56(1), 48–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research,2(1), 59–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2, 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Liu, B., Shen, Y., & Wang, X. (2016). The energy efficiency of China’s regional construction industry based on the three-stage DEA model and the DEA-DA model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,20(1), 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., & Sun, G. (2008). A Study on the Efficiency of Chinese Universities. China Economic Quarterly,7(3), 1079–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Data envelopment analysis. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science,71, 1–39.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., Färe, R., Fèare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y. J., Lu, H., & Bi, K. (2004). An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities. International Transactions in Operational Research,11(2), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis,17(1–2), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, R., Fuster, B., & Lillo-Bañuls, A. (2016). A three-stage DEA model to evaluate learning-teaching technical efficiency: Key performance indicators and contextual variables. Expert Systems with Applications,48, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review,21(1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G., Johnes, J., Thanassoulis, E., Lenton, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2005). An exploratory analysis of the cost structure of higher education in England. London: UK Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. (2006a). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review,25(3), 273–288.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring efficiency: A comparison of multilevel modelling and data envelopment analysis in the context of higher education. Bulletin of Economic Research,58(2), 75–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: UK Universities (Society for Research into Higher Education). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. K., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics,19(2–3), 233–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hung, H. T. (2008). Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study. Omega,36(4), 653–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities–some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics,42(16), 2063–2079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2016). Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Applied Energy,168, 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review,18, 435–444.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarko, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,20(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y. C., & Li, S. K. (2009). Efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese universities during the post-reform period. China Economic Review,20(2), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, J., & Chiang, T. (2012). Measuring the true managerial efficiency of bank branches in Taiwan: A three-stage DEA analysis. Expert Systems with Applications,39(13), 11494–11502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics,136(1), 31–64.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. A. (2005). A stochastic frontier analysis of English and Welsh universities. Education Economics,13(4), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Hu, H. (2017). Sustainable evaluation of social science research in higher education institutions based on data envelopment analysis. Sustainability,9(4), 644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. D., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: A review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society,68(4), 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., & Parteka, A. (2011). Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: A two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics,89(3), 887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S., Hu, M., & Su, B. (2016). Research on investment efficiency and policy recommendations for the culture industry of China based on a three-stage DEA. Sustainability,8(4), 324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). Industrial eco-efficiency in China: A provincial quantification using three-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production,143, 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71571173, 71701059, 71904084). Natural Science Foundation for Jiangsu Institutions (No. BK20190427), Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Institutions (No. 19GLC017), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos.1Z2019HGTB0095, No. XAB19005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixiang Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Zhang, G., Zhu, Q. et al. An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact. Scientometrics 122, 57–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03296-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03296-5

Keywords

Navigation