Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Capturing the salient aspects of IoT research: A Social Network Analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is integration of several technologies and communication solutions with many of the technologies reaching maturity stage and many are evolving. In recent years, IoT has emerged as one of the most exciting area of research and innovation activity with huge transformative potential. Smart homes, smart vehicles, smart clothes, autonomous vehicles, smart agriculture and a host of other applications are dependent in various ways upon the maturation of IoT. Research in this area is getting more application oriented, expansive in scope with loci of research and innovation dispersed across academia, research institutions and industry. It is thus becoming a challenging as well as a useful exercise to know the structure and dynamics of this field. The paper is centered on this issue; it tries to capture the intellectual structure of this field and research trends from quantitative and statistical analysis of research publications. Conceptual connections are constructed from linkages among keywords using tools and techniques of Social Network Analysis which is also used in constructing the conceptual framework for the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.livinginternet.com/i/ia_myths_toast.htm.

  2. https://www.avsystem.com/blog/what-is-iot-architecture/.

  3. https://devopedia.org/iot-operating-systems.

  4. (https://www.ibm.com/blogs/internet-of-things/industry-4-0/).

  5. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-government-is-pouring-money-into-the-internet-of-things-2016-5?IR=T.

  6. https://www.ctamericas.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/5-things-you-need-to-know-iot-in-china.pdf.

  7. https://www.peerbits.com/blog/difference-between-m2m-and-iot.html.

  8. The threshold was decided after experimentation with different threshold frequency and discussion with subject experts.

  9. https://www.semtech.com/lora/what-is-lora.

  10. https://enterpriseiotinsights.com/20170612/internet-of-things/what-lowrawan-main-benefits-technology-tag23.

  11. https://www.rcrwireless.com/20170707/wireless/what-is-mobile-edge-computing-tag27.

References

  • Aazam, M., Zeadally, S., & Harras, K. A. (2018). Deploying fog computing in industrial internet of things and industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(10), 4674–4682. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2855198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aegerter, A., & Benziger, A. S. (2015). Study the effect of internet on human abilities in future. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences., 2(5), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G., & Nitti, M. (2012). The social internet of things (SIoT)—When social networks meet the internet of things: Concept, architecture and network characterization. Computer Networks, 56(16), 3594–3608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baweja, B., Donovan, P., Haefele, M., Siddiqi, L., & Smiles, S. (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of Fourth Industrial Revolution. UBS White Paper for the World Economic Forum.

  • Bhattacharya, S. (2019). Some salient aspects of machine learning research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(2s), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.2.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Basu, P. (1998). Mapping research at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scintometrics, 43(3), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilal, M. (2017). A review of internet of things architecture, technologies and analysis smartphone-based attacks against 3D printers. arXiv arXiv:1708.04560

  • Botta, A., Donato, W. D., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2016). Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centenaro, M., Vangelista, L., Zanella, A., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(5), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2016.7721743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Mapping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, S. (2015). Analytics, machine learning, and the internet of things. IT Professional, 17(1), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B. (2015). The equipment and auto markets in Germany—moving into the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.whiteclarkegroup.com/news/equipment-auto-markets-germany-moving-fourth-industrial-revolution.

  • Liao, Y., Loures, E. R., Deschamps, F., Brezinski, G., & Venâncio, A. (2018). The impact of the fourth industrial revolution: a cross-country/region comparison. Production. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20180061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, R., Yousuf, T., Aloul, F., & Zualkernan, I. (2015). Internet of things (IoT) security: Current status, challenges and prospective measures. In 10th international conference for internet technology and secured transactions (ICITST). https://doi.org/10.1109/icitst.2015.7412116.

  • Mishra, N., Schreiber, R., Stanton, I., & Tarjan, R. E. (2007). Clustering social networks. In: A. Bonato & F. R. K. Chung (Eds.), Algorithms and models for the web-graph. WAW 2007. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4863). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Muthuramalingam, S., Bharathi, A., Kumar, S. R., Gayathri, N., Sathiyaraj, R., & Balamurugan, B. (2019). IoT based intelligent transportation system (IoT-ITS) for global perspective: A case study. Intelligent Systems Reference Library. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04203-5_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, T. A. (2010). RFID technology and its impact on the supply chain. Senior honors theses. 243. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from http://commons.emich.edu/honors/243.

  • National Academy of Science and Engineering—ACATECH. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0. final report of the industrie 4.0 working group. Frankfurt: ACATECH. Report.

  • Noor, M. B. M., & Hassan, W. H. (2018). Current research on internet of things (IoT) security: A survey. Computer Networks, 148, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirinen, P. (2014). A brief overview of 5G research activities. In 1st international conference on 5G for ubiquitous connectivity.

  • Rajab, H., & Cinkelr, T. (2018). IoT based smart cities. In 2018 international symposium on networks, computers and communications (ISNCC).

  • Ray, P. (2018). A survey on internet of things architectures. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 30(3), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, J. L., Ginther, D. K., Juhl, T., & Heppert, J. A. (2015). The effects of research & development funding on scientific productivity: Academic Chemistry, 1990–2009. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0138176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Williams, J. M., Lu, H., Khanna, R., & Pisharody, G. (2017). Internet of things: A scientometric review. Symmetry, 9(301), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, S., & Arockiam, L. (2016). Energy efficiency in internet of things: An overview. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER), 2(6), 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saturno, M., Pertel, V. M., Deschamps, F., & Loures, E. (2017). Proposal of an automation solutions architecture for Industry 4.0. In 24th international conference on production research.

  • Sinitsyn, A. A., & Nikiforov, O. Y. (2013). Informational system of monitoring, forecasting and stimulation for innovation-oriented activity of scientific and scientific-pedagogical university personnel. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27, 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, G., Atkinson, J., Mitchell, J., Rodrigues, M., & Andreopoulos, Y. (2016). Energy harvesting for the internet-of-things: Measurements and probability models. In 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2016.7500416.

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, B. N., Lee, T. S., & Lee, T. P. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105, 1285–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The valuable comments of the referees has helped to enrich this paper. The authors thank the referees for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS), K. S. Krishnan Marg, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India

    Sujit Bhattacharya & Shubham Singh

  2. AcSIR at NISTADS Campus, New Delhi, India

    Sujit Bhattacharya

  3. University School of Chemical Technology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector 16C, Dwarka, New Delhi, India

    Ravinder Kumar

Authors
  1. Sujit Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravinder Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shubham Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Bhattacharya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, S., Kumar, R. & Singh, S. Capturing the salient aspects of IoT research: A Social Network Analysis. Scientometrics 125, 361–384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03620-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03620-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation