Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What academic mobility configurations contribute to high performance: an fsQCA analysis of CSC-funded visiting scholars

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Against the backdrop of globalization, the world is witnessing increasingly frequent transnational mobility, placing scientific mobility in the spotlight. Highly competitive researchers with an international vision are regarded as engines that, for any nation, drive scientific and technological progress and social development. Over the past two decades, the China Scholarship Council (CSC) has provided sustainable financial and policy support to promote academic mobility. This study aims to identify complex antecedent configurations contributing to the high research performance of scholars after their research visits funded by the CSC. Fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) is employed to conduct a causal analysis on 630 researchers who received CSC academic mobility funding in 2012. Then, bibliometric indexes and fsQCA are combined to identify the antecedent configurations (combinations) that lead to the high research performance of these researchers. From experimental results, we identify six combinations (configurations) of visiting scholars and four combinations of postdoctoral researchers that lead to high research performance after their research visits. In more details, active international collaboration before their visits plays a core role in the high research performance of scholars after mobility. Meanwhile, the reputation of institutions and the academic position constitute an important part of the combinations that lead to high research performance. Additionally, the role of the duration of the research visit in the high performance of researchers cannot be ignored. Gender is not a crucial part of the causal combinations that explain high performance. This study provides insights to design and improve similar academic mobility programmes worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.cuaa.net/cur/2018/2018dxpm.html.

  2. https://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.html.

References

  • Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2013). Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J., & Wang, J. (2010). Superstar Extinction. Social ence Electronic Publishing, 125(2), 549–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Borrego, Á. (2012). Scientific production in psychology: A gender analysis. Scientometrics, 95(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. (2015). Parsimony and causality. Quality and Quantity, 49(2), 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M., & Thiem, A. (2017). Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research. Sociological Methods and Research, 46(4), 954–987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Sanchez Garcia, J. L. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2272–2278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P., Ding, D., & Thulin, P. (2020). Labour market mobility, knowledge diffusion and innovation. European Economic Review, 123, 103386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukhari, F., & Denman, B. (2013). Student scholarships in Saudi Arabia: Implications and opportunities for overseas engagement. Higher education in Saudi Arabia. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2013). Internationalization of the postdoctorate in the United States: Analyzing the demand for international postdoc labor. Higher Education, 66(5), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9621-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervelló-Royo, R., Moya-Clemente, I., Perelló-Marín, M. R., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2020). Sustainable development, economic and financial factors, that influence the opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. An fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 115, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSC (2018). China scholarship council official website. https://www.csc.edu.cn/.

  • Czaika, M., & Orazbayev, S. (2018). The globalisation of scientific mobility, 1970–2014. Applied Geography, 96, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaika, M., & Toma, S. (2017). International academic mobility across space and time: The case of Indian academics. Population, Space and Place, 23(8), e2069. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Filippo, D., Casado, E. S., & Gómez, I. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209x451032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y., & Jia, L. (2017). Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): A new way of management research (in Chinese). Management World, 6, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1093–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fangmeng, T. (2016). Brain circulation, diaspora and scientific progress: A study of the international migration of Chinese scientists, 1998–2006. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 25(3), 296–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Zubieta, A., Geuna, A., & Lawson, C. (2015). What do we know of the mobility of research scientists and of its impact on scientific production. Global Mobility of Research entists. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2611203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of management journal, 54(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C., Dmitry, S., & Cronqvist, L. (2013). Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyorffy, B., Nagy, A. M., Herman, P., & Torok, A. (2018). Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: An evaluation of the first 117 research groups. Scientometrics, 117(1), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2852-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., Jung, J., & Santos, J. M. (2018). Effects of mobilities on the research output and its multidisciplinarity of academics in Hong Kong and Macau: An exploratory study. Higher Education Quarterly, 72(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., Jung, J., & Santos, J. M. (2019). Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systems. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00173-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöns, H. (2011). Transnational academic mobility and gender. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.577199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2014). The intellect, mobility and epistemic positioning in doing comparisons and comparative education. Comparative Education, 50(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.874237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2017). Academic mobility, transnational identity capital, and stratification under conditions of academic capitalism. Higher Education, 73(6), 981–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0118-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larbi, F. O., & Ashraf, M. A. (2019). International academic mobility in Chinese academia: Opportunities and challenges. International Migration. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & Shibayama, S. (2015). International research visits and careers: An analysis of bioscience academics in Japan. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 690–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemanna, R. J. (2010). Gender inequalities in transnational academic mobility and the ideal type of academic entrepreneur. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Fang, Y. (2017). Edogenous resources, superimposed promotion and innovation strength of social governance: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 91 typical cases. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 25(04), 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, F. D., & Tartari, V. (2014). Should I stay or should I go? How mobility explains individual scientific performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014(1), 15422–15422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, J. M., & Korjani, M. M. (2012). Charles Ragin’s fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) used for linguistic summarizations. Information ences, 202, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. (1986). Capital mobility in the world economy: Theory and measurement. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 24, 55–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(86)90005-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, I. O., Papavlasopoulou, S., Mikalef, P., & Giannakos, M. N. (2020). Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs: An fsQCA approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrício, M. T., Santos, P., Loureiro, P. M., & Horta, H. (2017). Faculty-exchange programs promoting change: motivations, experiences, and influence of participants in the Carnegie Mellon University-Portugal faculty exchange program. Tertiary Education and Management, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1305440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pherali, T. J. (2011). Academic mobility, language, and cultural capital. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(4), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311421842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006). Institutional research productivity and the connection to average student quality and overall reputation. Economics of Education Review, 25(6), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science: University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. California: Univ of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Rihoux, B. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Rrubla, Y. A., & Zorio-Grima, A. (2016). Integrated reporting, connectivity, and social media. Psychology and Marketing, 33(12), 1159–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagintayeva, A., & Jumakulov, Z. (2017). KAZAKHSTAN’S BOLASHAK SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. International Higher Education, 79, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.-B.C., & Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W. (2018). Transnational research training: Chinese visiting doctoral students overseas and their host supervisors. Higher Education Quarterly, 72(3), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W., & Wang, C. (2018). Historical trends in PHD study abroad and their implications for transforming the Chinese higher education system. In P. A. Oleksiyenko, Q. Zha, I. Chirikov, et al. (Eds.). International status anxiety and higher education: Soviet legacy in China and Russia (pp. 309–334). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and Springer.

  • Sidhu, R., Yeoh, B. S. A., & Chang, S. (2015). A situated analysis of global knowledge networks: Capital accumulation strategies of transnationally mobile scientists in Singapore. Higher Education, 69(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. (2018). Comparing research productivity of returnee-PhDs in science, engineering, and the social sciences. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2706-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Zhao, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). On overseas postgraduate program of constructing high-level universities under fund of the China scholarship council. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 29(06), 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartari, V., Di Lorenzo, F., & Campbell, B. A. (2018). “Another roof, another proof”: The impact of mobility on individual productivity in science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 276–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9681-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2015). Academic mobility and migration: What we know and what we do not know. European Review, 23(S1), 6–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiem, A., & Dusa, A. (2013). [SpringerBriefs in Political Science] Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R Volume 5 Fuzzy-Set QCA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4584-5(Chapter 4), 51–81.

  • Thorn, K., & Holm-Nielsen, L. B. (2006). International mobility of researchers and scientists: Policy options for turning a drain into a gain. WIDER Working Paper Series (pp. 145–168). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532605.003.0006.

  • Vinay, P., Goldstein, J. A., & Brad, W. K. (2014). US news and world report cancer hospital rankings: Do they reflect measures of research productivity? PLoS ONE, 9(9), e107803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, H., Yu, C., Cai, X., Hao, L., Huang, P., Zhou, D., et al. (2014). Evaluation on the Training Quality of China Scholarship Graduate Student Overseas Study Program Based on Academic Thesis Output. Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 21(11), 1056–1057+1076, doi:https://doi.org/10.16770/j.cnki.1008-9985.2014.11.047.

  • Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2015). Constructing business-to-business marketing models that overcome the limitations in variable-based and case-based research paradigms. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 22(1–2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R. (2017). Academic socialization of Chinese doctoral students in Germany: Identification, interaction and motivation. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1290880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Hao, L., Xin, A., Zhai, D., & Pang, H. (2019). Types of DOI errors of cited references in web of science with a cleaning method. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1427–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03162-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., & Welch, A. R. (2010). Globalisation, transnational academic mobility and the Chinese knowledge diaspora: an Australian case study. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2010.516940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zecchina, A., & Anfossi, A. (2015). Mobility of scientists across Europe: The role played by European research funding. European Review, 23(S1), S89–S94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798714000829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, G. (2019). Deconstructing doctoral students’ socialization from an institutional logics perspective: A qualitative study of the socialization of Chinese doctoral students in Finland. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0011-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zippel, K. (2011). How gender neutral are state policies on science and international mobility of academics? Sociologica, Italian Journal of Sociology Online, (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2383/34631.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Youth Project of the Beijing Social Science Foundation: Research on the Mentor and Mentee Cooperation Mode and Cooperation Performance in Science and Technology Innovation Activities (Grant No. 15JYC025); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72074014 and 71603015); and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 9182001). Our gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People’s Republic of China

    Junwan Liu, Rui Wang & Shuo Xu

Authors
  1. Junwan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuo Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junwan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Wang, R. & Xu, S. What academic mobility configurations contribute to high performance: an fsQCA analysis of CSC-funded visiting scholars. Scientometrics 126, 1079–1100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03783-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03783-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation