Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multidimensional quantitative analysis of the Cuban scientific output and its regional context

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multidimensional approach was applied to analyze trends of the Cuban scientific output in the context of the 21 Latin American countries exceeding two million inhabitants. Output performance for each country were compared. The following parameters were analyzed: output and journals indexed at Scopus (SCImago stats, 1996–2018) and the Web of Science Core Collection (1996–2019), journals covered by SciELO, academic journals registered at Latindex, and the number of serials registered by the ISSN International Centre. The comparative elements include: Web of Science vs. Scopus annual output and by cumulative frequency, share of academic journal output by country vs. total output, output in national journals and document typologies. It was shown that either annual or cumulative, ranking in the LAC region has been quite stable despite few changes during 2015–2019. The rise of Brazil’s output either in foreign or Brazilian journals increased its cumulative regional contribution by 11.37% from 1996 to 2018 and equivalently stabilized or decreased the relative regional contribution indexes for most countries either cumulative (positive change only for Mexico) or annual (positive changes for Colombia, Ecuador, Chile and Peru). In spite of its 11th position in population and 10th position in GDP, Cuba ranked among the first eight most productive countries (ranked 7th in total documents), quantitatively outperforming LAC countries with more GDP and population. Its ranking was highly influenced by Cuban journals’ output. Some considerations are provided for a more balanced analysis of scientific output in relation to socio-economic and database indexing aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arencibia Jorge, R., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2008). La evaluación de la investigación científica: una aproximación teórica desde la cienciometría. Acimed, 17(4), aci04408. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/11603/?mode=full

  • Arencibia-Jorge, R., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output. Scientometrics, 83(3), 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, S., & Baltà, J. (2019). Stocktaking scientific publication on bi-regional collaboration between Europe 28 and latin America and the caribbean. Scientometrics, 121, 1447–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2020). Thomas theorem in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 123, 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, L., Rodríguez, C., & Valdés, P. (2018). La ciencia cubana a través de sus publicaciones en revistas arbitradas. Temas, 93, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Arencibia-Jorge, R., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Corera-Álvarez, E. (2015a). Somes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in scopus: The current situation and challenges. Scientometrics, 103(3), 779–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2015b). Latin american scientific output in public health: Combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators. Scientometrics, 102(1), 609–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confraria, H., & Vargas, F. (2019). Scientific systems in Latin America: Performance, networks, and collaborations with industry. Journal of technology transfer, 44(3), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dally, H. E. (2008). A steady-state economy. Opinion Piece for Redefining Prosperity. In U. Sustainable Development Commission (Ed.). London: Sustainable Development Commission, UK.

  • Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., & Simar, L. (2015). Rankings and university performance: A conditional multi- dimensional approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 918–930.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De la Vega, I., & Vessuri, H. (2008). Science and mobility: Is physical location relevant? Technology in Society, 30, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (1999). Science in America Latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators. Scientometrics, 46(2), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Cano, A. F., Curiel-Marin, E., Torralbo-Rodrigues, M., & Vallejo-Ruiz, M. (2018). Questioning the shanghai ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: An integrative review. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2069–2083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbán-Rodríguez, E., Torres-Ponjuán, D., Martí-Lahera, Y., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2019). Measuring the Cuban scientific output in scholarly journals through a comprehensive coverage approach. Scientometrics, 121(1), 1019–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Policy, 10(3), 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2018). Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: A tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twenty-first century. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1517–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, I., Sancho, R., Moreno, L., & Fernández, M. T. (1999). Influence of latin American journals coverage by international databases. Scientometrics, 46(3), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, G., & Moed, H. (2014). Part 3. International scientific collaboration. In U. I. f. Statistics (Ed.), Higher education in asia, expanding out, expanding up: the rise of graduate education and university research (pp. 79–92). Quebec: UNESCO UIS.

  • International organization for migration. (2019). World migration report 2020. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., Kavvoura, F. K., Tatsioni, A., Evangelou, E., & Kouri, I. (2007). International ranking systems for universities and institutions: A critical appraisal. BioMed Central Medicine, 5, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J. (2018). University rankings: What do they really show? Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauskopf, M., Pessot, R., & Vicuña, R. (1986). Science in latin America how much and along what lines? Scientometrics, 10(3–4), 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauskopf, M., Vera, M. I., Krauskopf, V., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1995). A citationist perspective on science in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1981–1993. Scientometrics, 34(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, G. A. (2010). Science Policy Studies and Documents in LAC, vol. 1. National science, technology and innovation systems in LAC. In UNESCO (Ed.), Science, technology and innovation policies in Latin America and the caribbean during the past six decades (pp. 15–140). Montevideo: UNESCO.

  • Lemarchand, G. A. (2012). The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010). Research Policy, 41(2), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinson, G., Fawcett-Jones, A., & Kessler, C. (1993). Latin American scientific output 1986–91 and International co-authorship patterns. Scientometrics, 27(3), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucio-Arias, D., Velez-Cuartas, G., & Leydesdorff, L. SciELO Citation Index and Web of Science: Distinctions in the visibility of regional science. In Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, 2015 (pp. 1152–1160): 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference.

  • Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D., Tarango, J., & Medina-Yllescas, E. (2017). Latin American triple-A journals 1: A quality roadmap from the quality indicators and journals’ presence in Web of Science and Scopus. Information Development, 33(4), 436–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ávila, D. (2019). Qualis Periódicos: el sistema brasileño de evaluación de revistas. Anuario ThinkEPI. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2019.e13e01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, S. (2011). Revistas y producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe: su visibilidad en SciELO, RedALyC y SCOPUS. Revista nteramericana de Bibliotecología, 34(2), 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, S., Santoro, V., & Belli, S. (2018). Mapping the development of open access in latin america and caribbean countries. An analysis of web of science core collection and SciELO citation Index (2005–2017). Scientometrics, 117, 1905–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreiro, J. A. (2002). Criterios e indicadores para evaluar la calidad del análisis documental de contenido. Ciencia da informacao, 31(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, Computer Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2018). Science & Engineering Indicators 2018. NSB-2018–1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.

  • OECD. (2017). OECD compendium of productivity indicators 2017. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información de la República de Cuba. (2016). Proyecciones de la población económicamente activa 2015– 2030. La Habana: ONEI

  • O’Neill, D. W. (2012). Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy. Ecological Economics, 84, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Callender, M., Roberts, S. A., & Roth-Berghofer, T. (2016). Evaluating patterns of national and international collaboration in Cuban science using bibliometric tools. Journal of Documentation, 72(2), 362–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, D. (2010). Análisis de series temporales. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, F. R. (1990). The measurement of a country’s scientific and technological potential. Scientometrics, 19(5–6), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2016). How can differences in international university rankings be explained? Scientometrics, 109, 2263–2278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2017). A three-dimensional bibliometric evaluation of recent research in India. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1085–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. d. S. Measuring the size of science. In Proceedings of the Israel Academy of scientific humanities, Jerusalem, 1969 (Vol. 4, pp. 1922–1983, Vol. 6): Israel Academy of scientific humanities

  • Publication trends: uneven growth (1995). Science, 267(5199), 807.

  • RICYT (2018). El Estado de la Ciencia. Principales indicadores de ciencia y tecnología Iberamericanos / Interamericanos. Buenos Aires: Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología – Iberoamericana e Interamericana.

  • Rodríguez-Sánchez, Y., Casate-Fernández, R., Sánchez-Rojas, C., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Rogel-Salazar, R., Becerril-García, A., et al. (2013). Informe sobre la producción científica de Cuba y el Caribe en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en Redalyc. La Habana: IDICT- UAEMEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, J. M. (2002). The future of Latin American science. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 22(5–6), 463–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval-Romero, V., & Lariviere, V. (2020). The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences. Scientometrics, 122, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). Coverage in scopus vs web of science off research produced in Latin america and the caribbean. Investigación bibliotecológica, 24(52), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Observatory. (2019). Dynamics of scientific production in the world, in Europe and in France, 2000–2016. Paris: OST.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCImago. (2020). SJR–SCImago. Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved Feb 21, 2020, from http://www.scimagojr.com.

  • Spinak, E. (1996). Diccionario Enciclopédico de Bibliometría, Cienciometría e Informetría. Caracas: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1979). An introduction to policy analysis in S&T. Science Policy Studies And Documents, 46, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1996). Informe mundial sobre la ciencia. Madrid: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2010). Measuring R&D: Challenges faced by developing countries. Technical paper no. 5. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics-UIS.

  • UNESCO (2018). Informe de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia. Hacia 2030. Panorámica de América Latina y el Caribe. París: UNESCO.

  • van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of science and scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(1), 1803–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicéns-Feliberty, M. A., & Ricketts, C. F. (2016). An analysis of Puerto Rican interest to migrate to the United States using Google trends. J Develop Areas, 50(2), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wang, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology cooperation: building capacity in developing countries? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., & Noyons, E. (2018). Bibliometrics for research management and research evaluation. A Brief Introduction. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies – Leiden University.

  • Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2018). Medical scientific output and specialization in latin American countries. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1635–1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2717-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the PhD Program on Information Sciences of the Faculty of Communication, University of Havana. The authors want to thank to Dr. Luis C. Velázquez Pérez, President of the Cuban Academy of Sciences, for encouraging this work, and also to MSc. Carmen Valenzuela Silva, from the Center of Molecular Immunology in Havana, for statistical suggestions and comments. The views, interpretations and statements are solely of the authors and cannot be regarded as official nor institutional statements. Finally, the authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers, who professionally contributed to improve this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Elfos Scientiae Publisher, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, CIGB, Ave 31 e/158 y 190. Cubanacán, Playa, 11600, Havana, Cuba

    Ernesto Galbán-Rodríguez

  2. Faculty of Communication, University of Havana, Havana, Cuba

    Deborah Torres-Ponjuán

  3. Center of Complexity Sciences C3, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Centro Cultural s/n, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico

    Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge

Authors
  1. Ernesto Galbán-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah Torres-Ponjuán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Galbán-Rodríguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galbán-Rodríguez, E., Torres-Ponjuán, D. & Arencibia-Jorge, R. Multidimensional quantitative analysis of the Cuban scientific output and its regional context. Scientometrics 126, 2643–2665 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03904-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03904-3

Keywords