Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A measure of reliability for scientific co-authorship networks using fuzzy logic

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on the reliability of scientific co-authorship networks identify whether they are reliable, according to their researchers’ participation and how strong the co-authorship relationships are. Co-authorship among members of a research group can usually be represented by a graph in which each node represents one of the researchers belonging to this group, and each edge represents a connection (co-authorship relationship) between two researchers. The aim of this investigation is to propose a mathematical analysis using fuzzy logic to estimate the reliability of scientific co-authorship networks, based on node centrality measures and the existence of uncertainties in estimating the reliability of the individual components (researchers). To develop the proposed methodology, a research group from São Paulo State University–UNESP registered with the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) in Brazil was analysed. The results show the simplicity of implementation and the viability of mathematical modelling to estimate the reliability of scientific co-authorship networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Network is a physical, biological or social system characterised by a large set of well-defined entities interacting dynamically with each other.

  2. A graph is simple, abstract and intuitive information that represents some form of relationship among items. It is a figure with nodes (representing the items) joined by edges (making up the imagined relationship).

  3. Subgraph is a graph obtained from G by eliminating of some of its nodes and/or edges without making it unconnected.

References

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hwang, J. (2010). Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the rc-index and the cc-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics, 83(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Wigand, R., & Hossain, L. (2014). Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance. Library & Information Science Research, 36, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghili, S. J., & Hajian-Hoseinabadi, H. (2017). Reliability evaluation of repairable systems using various fuzzy-based methods: A substation automation case study. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 85, 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, T. (2015). The mathematics of social network analysis: Metrics for academic social networks. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 4(12), 889–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R. E., & Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Colbourn, C. J. (1991). Combinatorial aspects of network reliability. Annals of Operations Research, 33(1), 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dehdarirad, T., & Nasini, S. (2017). Research impact in co-authorship networks: a two-mode analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, O., Jaillet, P., & Lasota, R. (1994). On reliability of graphs with node failures. Networks, 24(4), 251–259.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler, C., & Sauermann, H. (2013). Credit where credit is due? the impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy, 42(3), 688–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, L., & Zhang, X. (2016). Fuzzy reliability analysis using cellular automata for network systems. Information Sciences, 348, 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichsen, D., & Pritchard, A. J. (2005). Stability theory. In Mathematical Systems Theory I, Springer, pp 193–368.

  • Kavousifard, A., & Samet, H. (2011). Consideration effect of uncertainty in power system reliability indices using radial basis function network and fuzzy logic theory. Neurocomputing, 74(17), 3420–3427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelmans, A. (1966). Connectivity of probabilistic networks. Automatic Telemekhanic, 3, 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P., & Xia, H. (2015). Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field. Scientometrics, 103(1), 101–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lyra, T. F., & Oliveira, C. S. (2011). Um estudo sobre confiabilidade de redes e medidas de centralidade em uma rede de co-autoria (a study on network reliability and measures of centrality for a co-authorship network). Pesquisa Operacional para o Desenvolvimento, 3(2), 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 7(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB. (2010). version 7.10.0 (R2010a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, S. C., Ferreira, Td. P., & Brigantini, B. B. (2016). A comparative study on the reliability of co-authorship networks with emphases on edges and nodes. Acta Scientiarum Technology, 38(3), 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, S. C., Cobre, J., & Ferreira, Td. P. (2017). A bayesian approach for the reliability of scientific co-authorship networks with emphasis on nodes. Social Networks, 48(1), 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, S. C. D., Ferreira, T. D. P., Brigantini, B. B., & Uehara, J. K. (2014). Inferência estatística clássica para a confiabilidade de rede de coautoria com enfoque nos vértices. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 19(4), 202–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piegat, A. (2001). Fuzzy Modeling and Control. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiee, P., & Shabgahi, G. L. (2011). Evaluating the reliability of communication networks (wan) using their fuzzy fault tree analysis-a case study. Journal of Mathematical and Computational Science, 2(2), 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shpungin, Y. (2006). Combinatorial approach to reliability evaluation of network with unreliable nodes and unreliable edges. International Journal of Computer Science, 1(3), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. S. A. (2010). Um estudo de medidas de centralidade e confiabilidade em redes. 2010. PhD thesis, Dissertação–(Mestrado em Tecnologia)–Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca.

  • Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009). Author name disambiguation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, C. G., & Barbastefano, R. G. (2011). Knowledge diffusion and collaboration networks on life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(6), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. J., Shi, X., McFarland, D. A., & Leskovec, J. (2012a). Measurement error in network data: A re-classification. Social Networks, 34(4), 396–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Hicks, D., Melkers, J., Xiao, F., & Pinheiro, D. (2012b). A boosted-trees method for name disambiguation. Scientometrics, 93(2), 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A co-authorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Wang, M., Tang, M., & Yang, H. (2018). The reliability measures model of multilayer urban distribution network. Soft Computing, 22(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank CNPq for the financial support for the research (Notice 18/2012; Process 406626/2012-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. São Paulo State University – UNESP, Tupã, São Paulo, 17602-496, Brazil

    Sandra Cristina de Oliveira & Danilo Florentino Pereira

  2. Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13560-970, Brazil

    Juliana Cobre

Authors
  1. Sandra Cristina de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliana Cobre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danilo Florentino Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Cobre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, S.C., Cobre, J. & Pereira, D.F. A measure of reliability for scientific co-authorship networks using fuzzy logic. Scientometrics 126, 4551–4563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03915-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03915-0

Keywords