Skip to main content
Log in

A proposed fixed-sum carryovers reallocation DEA approach for social scientific resources of Chinese public universities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How to evaluate and optimize the allocative efficiency of multiple research resources is of great importance for decision-makers and has great practical application value. This is especially true in the case of unbalanced allocation and inefficient utilization of research resources in Chinese higher education institutions (HEIs). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) brings a new perspective on the resource allocation problem. However, the conventional paradigm of the resource allocation model in DEA assumes that inputs or outputs can be expanded freely when projecting decision-making units (DMUs) onto the efficient frontier. Thus, it is very difficult to deal with a situation where there is a trade-off between the evaluated units with the fixed-sum output. Considering a common resource allocation problem that occurs in multi-period activities where a carry-over indicator has the fixed-sum characteristic, we extend the study of Yang et al. (Eur J Oper Res 246(1):209–217, 2015) into a dynamic framework by taking the time dimension into account. The proposed approach is applied to reallocate the social scientific resources of Chinese HEIs from 2017 to 2019. The results show that all DMUs are in effective condition after reallocation and the optimal adjustments of newly approved projects can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data collected from Educational Statistics Yearbook of China.

  2. Data sources: China Statistical Yearbook on Science and Technology (2020).

References

  • Agasisti, T., Yang, G.-L., Song, Y.-Y., & Tran, C.-T.T.D. (2021). Evaluating the higher education productivity of Chinese and European “elite” universities using a meta-frontier approach. Scientometrics, 126(7), 5819–5853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori, A., Masrouri, S., Yang, F., & Kordrostami, S. (2017). Context-based competition strategy and performance analysis with fixed-sum outputs: An application to banking sector. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(11), 1461–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G. B., Feng, C. P., Ding, J. J., Liang, L., & Chu, F. (2014). The linear formulation of the ZSG-DEA models with different production technologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(8), 1202–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Guo, M., Li, Y., Liang, L., & Salo, A. (2021). Efficiency intervals, rank intervals and dominance relations of decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(1), 238–249.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Yang, Z. B., & Yang, L. L. (2020). How to optimize the allocation of research resources? An empirical study based on output and substitution elasticities of universities in Chinese provincial level. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, 100707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu Ng, Y., & Li, S. K. (2000). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: An application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 8(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeilzadeh, A., & Kazemi Matin, R. (2019). Multi-period efficiency measurement of network production systems. Measurement, 134, 835–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiyasi, M. (2018). Performance assessment and capital budgeting based on performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(6), 1729–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, E. G., & Lins, M. P. E. (2008). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 616–623.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Han, U., Asmild, M., & Kunc, M. (2016). Regional R&D efficiency in Korea from static and dynamic perspectives. Regional Studies, 50(7), 1170–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Lee, S. K., & Rah, M.-J. (2020). Assessing the research efficiency of Chinese higher education institutions by data envelopment analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2013). Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(2), 325–330.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., & Thakur, R. R. (2019). Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(4), 774–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. L., & Worthington, A. C. (2016). A network DEA quantity and quality-orientated production model: An application to Australian university research services. Omega, 60, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2015). Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 942–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1365–1410.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. J., Hou, W. H., Zhu, W. W., Li, F., & Liang, L. (2021). Provincial carbon emission performance analysis in China based on a Malmquist data envelopment analysis approach with fixed-sum undesirable outputs. Annals of Operations Research, 304(1–2), 233–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, M. P. E., Gomes, E. G., de Mello, J., & de Mello, A. (2003). Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(2), 312–322.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. M. (2012). Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1081–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., See, K. F., Yu, M.-M., & Zhao, C. (2021). Research efficiency analysis of China’s university faculty members: A modified meta-frontier DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 76, 100944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi, L., & Liu, W. (2008). Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 36(6), 950–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, S. R. (2005). Benchmarking evaluation of performance of public research institutes using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 64(6), 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C., & Agasisti, T. (2017). Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling. Omega, 67, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamohammadi, M., & Oh, D.-H. (2019). Measuring the efficiency changes of private universities of Korea: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, R. S., Angulo-Meza, L., & Sant’Anna, A. P. (2021). A proposed multistage evaluation approach for Higher Education Institutions based on network Data envelopment analysis: A Brazilian experience. Evaluation and Program Planning, 89, 101984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E., Dey, P. K., Petridis, K., Goniadis, I., & Georgiou, A. C. (2017). Evaluating higher education teaching performance using combined analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villano, R. A., & Tran, C. (2018). Performance of private higher education institutions in Vietnam: Evidence using DEA-based bootstrap directional distance approach with quasi-fixed inputs. Applied Economics, 50(55), 5966–5978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. D. (2019). Performance-based resource allocation for higher education institutions in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 65, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Hu, H. (2017) Sustainable evaluation of social science research in higher education institutions based on data envelopment analysis. Sustainability, 9(4), 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, E. C., & Huang, W. (2007). Relative efficiency of R & D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 36(2), 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Zhang, X., Wei, Y. M., & Yu, S. W. (2013). Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy, 54, 214–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhang, G., Zhu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2020). An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact. Scientometrics, 122(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Ji, X., Chu, J., & Liang, L. (2016a). Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 182–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhu, Q. Y., An, Q. X., Chu, J. F., & Ji, X. (2016b). Resource allocation based on context-dependent data envelopment analysis and a multi-objective linear programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wubetie, H. T. (2017). Missing data management and statistical measurement of socio-economic status: Application of big data. Journal of Big Data, 4, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-017-0099-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaisawarng, S., & Ng, Y. C. (2014). The impact of higher education reform on research performance of Chinese universities. China Economic Review, 31, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., Wu, D. D., Liang, L., & O’Neill, L. (2011). Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(3), 560–569.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G.-L., Fukuyama, H., & Song, Y.-Y. (2018). Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 10–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, L. (2014). An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 479–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Li, Y. J., & Liang, L. (2015). A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 209–217.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Banker, R. D., Li, X., & Liu, W. (2011). Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Research Policy, 40(6), 875–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Performance evaluation and enrollment quota allocation for higher education institutions in China. Evaluation and Program Planning, 81, 101821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., & Cook, W. D. (2007). Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. NS2022076, No. NK2022003); Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (No. 2021K293B); Shandong Provincial Education Science Planning Project (No. 2021QZD003); the Frontier Exploration Project "Optimizing the Allocation of Scientific and Technological Resources and Application of the Double Helix Method" of the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. E2X1201Z).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-qun Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, X., Yang, Gl., Liu, Kd. et al. A proposed fixed-sum carryovers reallocation DEA approach for social scientific resources of Chinese public universities. Scientometrics 127, 4097–4121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04411-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04411-9

Keywords

Navigation