Skip to main content
Log in

Using text mining and forest plots to identify similarities and differences between two spine-related journals based on medical subject headings (MeSH terms) and author-specified keywords in 100 top-cited articles

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature research requires an understanding of the similarities and differences between different types of journals. It has not yet been possible to use text-mining to demonstrate the differences between the topics of articles by presenting features of article keywords using forest plots. It is important for authors to make a quick assessment of the similarities and differences between research types when submitting an article for publication in a journal. Our study uses text mining and forest plotting techniques to extract article features and compare the similarities and differences between the two journals' research types. There were a total of 100 top-cited articles selected from Spine (Phila Pa 1976) and The Spine Journal: official journals of the North American Spine Society with impact factors of 3.19 and 3.22 respectively, as reported by Journal Citation Reports (JCR) for 2018. XLSTAT software was used to extract features from author-made keywords and medical subject headings (e.g., MeSH terms in PubMed). These 200 top-cited articles were analyzed and clustered by performing factor analysis and social network analysis (SNA). The study presented three types of results: (1) descriptive statistics, (2) classification analysis, and (3) inferential statistics. The chi-square test was used to examine the frequency of clusters and journals, and forest plots were used to analyze differences between journals in terms of research topics. It was observed that (1) the United States dominated publications, accounting for 54% of 200 articles; the MeSH term of surgery was simultaneously highlighted in both journals using a word cloud generator; (2) five-term clusters were identified, namely, (i) Pain & Prognosis, (ii) Statistics & Data, (iii) Spine & Surgery, (iv) physiopathology, and (v) physiology; (4) there were no differences in distribution counts among categories between journals (Chi Square = 1.64, df = 4, p = 0.82), but differences in category(factor) scores between journals were found(Q-statistic = 484.94, df = 4, p < 0.001). Using text mining and a forest plot, we are able to understand the relationships between the types of research in different journals. Readers can use this research as a reference for future journal submissions based on the study results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in this study are available in the Online Appendices.

Abbreviations

ASD:

Adult spinal deformity

EFA:

Exploratory factor analysis

JCR:

Journal citation reports

MeSH:

Medical subject headings

RT:

Research topics

SNA:

Social network analysis

SMD:

Standard mean the difference

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Enago (www.enago.tw) for the English language review of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PHC initiated the research. JCJL collected data and conducted the analysis. PHC wrote the manuscript. TWC contributed to the study’s design and provided critical reviews of the manuscript, and TWC contributed to the interpretation of the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Hsin Chou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All data were downloaded from the MEDLINE database at pubmed.com.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chou, PH., Lin, JC.J. & Chien, TW. Using text mining and forest plots to identify similarities and differences between two spine-related journals based on medical subject headings (MeSH terms) and author-specified keywords in 100 top-cited articles. Scientometrics 128, 1–17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04549-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04549-6

Keywords

Navigation