Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological issues on statistical rigor of agreement analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the intention to evaluate a current h(fa)-index which considered the relative contribution of each author, Sebo P and colleagues selected senior hospital physicians from six college hospitals in Switzerland between 1 and 14 March 2020. Using Web of Science, the authors assessed the h(fa)-index of all physicians with acquired non-zero h-index. They applied Cohen’s kappa statistic to calculate the inter-rater agreement between the h-index and the h(fa)-index. We argue that the agreement between the results of the two metrics is disputed by Cohen’s kappa statistic. Therefore, we recommend that an additional appropriate statistical approach, the weighted Cohen’s kappa statistic, should be used in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Heilongjiang Province Higher Education Teaching Reform Project (Grant No. SJGY20200799) and Qiqihar University Degree and Postgraduate Education and Teaching Reform Research Project (Grant No. JGXM_QUG_Z2019003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ML drafted the manuscript. QG analyzed and interpreted the data. TY developed the study concept and design. The study was supervised by ML and TY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ming Li or Tianfei Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Gao, Q. & Yu, T. Methodological issues on statistical rigor of agreement analysis. Scientometrics 128, 2025–2027 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04591-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04591-4

Keywords

Navigation