Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Partners’ partners matter: the effect of partners’ centrality diversity on the focal organization’s innovation outputs

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the importance of partner diversity in managing the innovation process, prior studies mainly focus on characteristics within an organization. Our understanding of how diversity among partners’ network structures can affect the focal organization’s innovation outputs is still limited. This study addresses the above research gap by developing a model that explains how partners’ centrality diversity affects the focal organization’s innovation outputs and investigates the influencing mechanisms in depth by introducing knowledge diversity as a mediator and knowledge distance as a moderator. We select data of the smartphone collaboration network from 2004 to 2017. The regression results suggest that partners’ centrality diversity has an inverted U-shaped relationship with exploratory innovation and positively affects exploitative innovation. Additionally, knowledge diversity mediates the effect of the partners’ centrality diversity on exploratory innovation. The findings also indicate that knowledge distance weakens the effect of the partners’ centrality diversity on knowledge diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, V. A. (2020). Resource congestion in alliance networks: How a firm’s partners’ partners influence the benefits of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 41(4), 627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi, J., Xie, E., & Sheng, S. (2021). Tie strength dispersion and alliance portfolio performance: The moderating effects of CEOs’ political and international experience. British Journal of Management., 33(2), 997–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolli, T., Seliger, F., & Woerter, M. (2020). Technological diversity, uncertainty and innovation performance. Applied Economics, 52(17), 1831–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2010). Collaborative strategies in design-intensive industries: knowledge diversity and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (2003). Some lessons from transaction-cost politics for less-developed countries. Economics & Politics, 15(2), 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K., Lüthje, C., & Haag, S. (2011). Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Planning, 44(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Oord, A. V. D. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Liu, N. (2016). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy, 45(1), 97–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Lokshin, B., & Zobel, A. K. (2018). Partner type diversity in alliance portfolios: Multiple dimensions, boundary conditions and firm innovation performance. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 809–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, V. D. F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and ambidexterity. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(4), 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Partners’ centrality diversity and firm innovation performance: Evidence from China. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos, A. G. (2012). Leveraging micro- and macro-structures of embeddedness in alliance networks for exploratory innovation in biotechnology. R & D Management, 42(1), 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., & Zaheer, A. (2019). Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 691–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, N. (2010). Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1194–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, H.-C., & Weng, C. S. (2016). Exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation in the phase of technological discontinuity: The perspective on patent data for two IC foundries. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2016). Network imprinting and the variability of venture capital firm performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.

  • Liang, X., & Liu, A. M. M. (2018). The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation: A bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector. Research Policy, 47(7), 1295–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without u? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Stats, 72(1), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makri, M., Hitt, M. A., & Lane, P. J. (2010). Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 602–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, V., Rosenbusch, N., & Bausch, A. (2013). Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation a meta-analysis of the influence of institutional factors. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1606–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2018). Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 615–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of geographic and network ties on exploitative and exploratory product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1105–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & Mcdougall, P. (2005). Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1028–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman, N., & Saives, A. L. (2005). Indirect networks: An intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35(2), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., Holmstr, M. J., Napier, N., & Levén, P. (2015). Balancing diversity in innovation networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarpong, O., & Teirlinck, P. (2018). The influence of functional and geographical diversity in collaboration on product innovation performance in SMEs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(6), 1667–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SatishNambisan. (2013). Industry technical committees, technological distance, and innovation performance. Research Policy, 42(4), 928–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sytch, M., & Tatarynowicz, A. (2014). Exploring the locus of invention: The dynamics of network communities and firms’ invention productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 249–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Yang, N., & Guo, M. (2019). Dynamic positioning matters: Uncovering its fundamental role in organization’s innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(5), 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Yang, N., & Guo, M. (2020a). How social capital influences innovation outputs: An empirical study of the smartphone field. Innovation, 23(4), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Yang, N., Zhang, Y., & Song, Y. (2020b). Dynamics of firm’s network community associations and firm’s innovation performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(3), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuyts, S., & Dutta, S. (2014). Benefiting from alliance portfolio diversity: The role of past internal knowledge creation strategy. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1653–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Dong, J. Q., & Faems, D. (2020). Not every coopetitor is the same: The impact of technological, market and geographical overlap with coopetitors on firms’ breakthrough inventions. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Guan, J. C. (2018). Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Zhang, J. J., & Guan, J. C. (2018). The dynamics of technological partners: A social network perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(4), 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang, J. (2018). Structural holes, exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation. Management Decision, 56(8), 1682–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., & Tang, C. (2018). How R&D partner diversity influences innovation performance: An empirical study in the nano-biopharmaceutical field. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1487–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2019). Recombinant distance, network governance and recombinant innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Li, J., & Li, N. (2022). Partner technological heterogeneity and innovation performance of R&D alliances. R&D Management, 52(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provide by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 71871182, 72101274, 72271143), General Program of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education of China (Grant Number 22YJC630134), Natural Science Foundation of Shannxi Province (Grant Number 2023-JC-QN-0787), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant Number 2022JJ40646), and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant Number 20YBQ104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan, People’s Republic of China

    Jingbei Wang

  2. College of Economic & Management, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    Min Guo

  3. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China

    Hui Liu

  4. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    Yafei Nie

Authors
  1. Jingbei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yafei Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Guo, M., Liu, H. et al. Partners’ partners matter: the effect of partners’ centrality diversity on the focal organization’s innovation outputs. Scientometrics 128, 1547–1565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04637-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04637-1

Keywords