Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporal trends in academic performance and career duration of principal investigators in ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic job markets have become increasingly challenging worldwide, with rising performance requirements for recruitment as a new faculty member and promotion to full professor in recent years. However, it remains underexplored how research performance and other determinants of academic success, including PhD university origin, prestige, and gender, affect recruitment and promotion over time. Focusing on the field of ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan, we analyzed the academic performance (measured as h-index) as well as the duration before recruitment and promotion of 145 principal investigators (PIs) over the past 34 years. We found that the performance of PIs before recruitment and before promotion both increased in recent years, and male PIs had on average higher performance than female PIs before recruitment. Moreover, the career duration before recruitment and before promotion both increased in recent years. PIs with Taiwanese PhD degrees tended to have longer duration before recruitment. PhD university ranking had no effect on performance and duration either before recruitment or before promotion. We also found that academic performance of PIs recruited in recent years decreased post-recruitment. Furthermore, PIs with Taiwanese PhD degrees appeared to exhibit a drop in performance post-promotion compared to those with foreign degrees. Taken together, our study reveals increased academic performance requirements and career duration of PIs in ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan over the last three decades, and illustrates the role of PhD degree and gender in determining academic success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, S. E., Bell, A. J., Toseland, C. P., & Twelvetrees, A. (2019). A survey of new PIs in the UK. eLife, 8, e46827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuna, D. E., Allesina, S., & Kording, K. P. (2012). Predicting scientific success. Nature, 489, 201–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. R package version.

  • Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J. S. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brischoux, F., & Angelier, F. (2015). Academia’s never-ending selection for productivity. Scientometrics, 103, 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. (2021). “Why should a ‘foreigner’ be better than me?”: Preferential practices in junior academic faculty recruitment among mainland Chinese universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 28, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1, e1400005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472, 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell, R. (2011). Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author’s track record? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1996). What Is The primordial reference for the phrase “publish or perish”? The Scientist, 10, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan, N., Hawley, J., Larson, R., & Xue, Y. (2015). A note on PhD population growth in biomedical sciences. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32, 402–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index—A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, L., Wu, Q., & Xie, Y. (2022). Does early publishing in top journals really predict long-term scientific success in the business field? Scientometrics, 127(11), 6083–6107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, G. C., Lin, W. J., & Sun, S. J. (2022). Increased academic performance and prolonged career duration among Taiwanese academic faculty in ecology and evolutionary biology. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.31.478501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A. L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 4609–4616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504, 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. C., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xue, Y. (2014). Too many PhD graduates or too few academic job openings: The basic reproductive number R0 in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31, 745–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F., Useche, D. C., Laurance, S. G., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2013). Predicting publication success for biologists. BioScience, 63, 817–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, J. (2018). Predicting research excellence at the individual level: The importance of publication rate, top journal publications, and top 10% publications in the case of early career mathematicians. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 518–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google scholar, web of science, and scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 1160–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google scholar, microsoft academic, scopus, dimensions, web of science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126, 871–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M., Gelb, D. J., Wilson, K., Pawloski, M., Burke, J. F., Shelgikar, A. V., & London, Z. N. (2018). Sex differences in academic rank and publication rate at top-ranked US neurology programs. JAMA Neurology, 75, 956–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2018). Science and engineering indicators. NSB-2018-1. Retrieved from February 6, 2022, from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/

  • Pauly, D., & Stergiou, K. I. (2005). Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s citation index and google’s scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 9, 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing.

  • Rawat, S., & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 19, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan Haley, M. (2012). Rank variability of the publish or perish metrics for economics and finance journals. Applied Economics Letters, 20, 830–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.697115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, P. E., Páez-Vacas, M., Guayasamin, J. M., & Stynoski, J. L. (2019). Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. PloS one, 14(6), e0218598.

  • Schillebeeckx, M., Maricque, B., & Lewis, C. (2013). The missing piece to changing the university culture. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 938–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (2013). Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 1–301). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart, R. K., Sundaram, M., Höök, T. O., & Dewoody, J. A. (2016). Factors affecting scholarly performance by wildlife and fisheries faculty. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 80, 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M. R. E., Gemmell, N. J., Braisher, T. L., Gorringe, K. L., & Elgar, M. A. (2006). Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE, 1, e127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, D., Manor, O., & Carey, L. B. (2014). Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Current Biology, 24, 516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R. (2019). How much do you have to publish to get a job in a top sociology department? Or to get tenure? Trends over a generation. Sociological Science, 6, 172–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE, 8, e66212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 393, 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, Y., & Larson, R. C. (2015). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review, 2015, 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ming-Yang Megan Chang for useful comments on the manuscript. They also thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Funding

SJS was funded by NTU New Faculty Founding Research Grant (111L7487, 112L7308, and 111L7324), National Science and Technology Council 2030 Cross-Generation Young Scholars Program (111-2628-B-002-050-), and the Yushan Fellow Program (111V1024) provided by the Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Gen-Chang Hsu

  2. Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Wei-Jiun Lin

  3. International Degree Program in Climate Change and Sustainable Development, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    Syuan-Jyun Sun

Authors
  1. Gen-Chang Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei-Jiun Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Syuan-Jyun Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G-CH and S-JS conceived the study; W-JL and S-JS collected the data; G-CH and S-JS analyzed the data. All authors were involved in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syuan-Jyun Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Please note that this manuscript has also been posted on bioRxiv (Hsu et al., 2022) at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.31.478501v2, following the Springer Nature preprint sharing policy. It has also been added to the reference list.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 11 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 161 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, GC., Lin, WJ. & Sun, SJ. Temporal trends in academic performance and career duration of principal investigators in ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan. Scientometrics 128, 3437–3451 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04710-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04710-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation