Abstract
The goal of the paper is to identify groups/clusters of countries with similar scientific collaboration “profiles” inside the group and to other groups of countries. The collaboration is described by co-authorship of a publication network that can be analyzed on the original co-authorship network. However, the network is dominated by large values in rows and columns of the most scientifically productive countries, which highly correlates with their sizes. This problem is especially relevant for countries with a big diversity such as post-Soviet countries. Normalization of the collaboration network allows making the countries’ collaboration comparable; therefore the question about its applicability and sensitivity to the collaboration structure is relevant. We analyze co-authorship networks of post-Soviet countries for the period 1993–2018. We use three types of network normalizations to make publication output of the countries comparable, namely affinity normalization, Jaccard normalization, and activity normalization. They provide different views on the scientific collaboration structure of the countries. We reveal the effect of the country size is the strongest when using the affinity normalization and it seems there is no countries ‘size effect for the activity normalization. Affinity normalizations reveal a big imbalance of collaboration between post-Soviet countries caused by their sizes. Russia has a great impact due to its size. Jaccard normalization reveals countries` collaboration is influenced by their neighborhood or by the size of national sciences. Activity normalization detects the research potential of a particular country. We also observe during the past twenty-five years the scientific collaboration has significantly changed, and the previously dominant position of Russia is decreasing. New groups of intense scientific collaboration have formed, affected by geographical neighborhood.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.
References
Allik, J. (2003). The quality of science in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania after the first decade of independence. Trames, 7(1), 40–52.
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33, 99–123.
Batagelj, V. (2020). On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics, 123(2), 621–633.
Batagelj, V. (2021). Analysis of the Southern women network using fractional approach. Social Networks, 68, 229–236.
Batagelj, V., & Bren, M. (1995). Comparing resemblance measures. Journal of Classification, 12(1), 73–90.
Batagelj, V., Doreian, P., Ferligoj, A., & Kejžar, N. (2014). Understanding large temporal networks and spatial networks: Exploration, pattern searching. Wiley.
Batagelj, V., & Ferligoj, D. P. (1992). Direct and indirect methods for structural equivalence. Social Networks, 14(1–2), 63–90.
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Density based approaches to network analysis; Analysis of Reuters terror news network. Workshop on link analysis for detecting complex behavior (LinkKDD2003). Retrieved August 27, 2003, from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/dunja/LinkKDD2003/papers/Batagelj.pdf
Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). Analyzing affiliation networks. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 417–433). Sage.
Chankseliani, M., Lovakov, A., & Pislyakov, V. (2021). A big picture: Bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8701–8730.
Cho, H., & Yu, Y. (2018). Link prediction for interdisciplinary collaboration via co-authorship network. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8(1), 1–12.
Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., & Ferligoj, A. (2005). Generalized blockmodeling. Cambridge University Press.
Ferligoj, A., Kronegger, L., Mali, F., Snijders, T. A., & Doreian, P. (2015). Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system. Scientometrics, 104(3), 985–1012.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Springer.
Graham, L. B. (1993). Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history. Cambridge University Press.
Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12.
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218.
Jaccard, P. (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin De La Societe Vaudoise Des Sciences Naturelles, 44, 223–270.
Kozak, M., Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1101–1117.
Krementsov, N. (1996). Stalinist science. Princeton University Press.
Kuraev, A. (2014). Internationalization of higher education in Russia: collapse or perpetuation of the Soviet system? A historical and conceptual study. Boston College.
Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.
Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.
Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Lovakov, A. (2022). International scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 127(3), 1583–1607.
Moed, H. F., Markusova, V., & Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, 116, 1153–1180.
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.
Rabkin, Y. M., & Mirskaya, E. Z. (1993). Science and scientists in the post-Soviet disunion. Social Science Information, 32(4), 553–579.
Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846–850.
van der Wal, J. E., Thorogood, R., & Horrocks, N. P. (2021). Collaboration enhances career progression in academic science, especially for female researchers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1958), 20210219.
Vollrath, T. L. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127, 265–280.
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 185–208.
Yamashita, Y., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Patterns of scientific collaboration between Japan and France: Inter-sectoral analysis using Probabilistic Partnership Index (PPI). Scientometrics, 68(2), 303–324.
Yegorov, I. (2009). Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine. Research Policy, 38(4), 600–609.
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627–657.
Acknowledgements
All computations were performed using the program for large network analysis and visualization Pajek and the statistical programming system R. This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant 20-18-00140), by the Slovenian Research Agency (Research Programs P1-0294 and P5-0168, and Research Projects J1-2481 and J5-2557), and prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Matveeva, N., Batagelj, V. & Ferligoj, A. Scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: the effects of different network normalizations. Scientometrics 128, 4219–4242 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04752-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04752-z
Keywords
- Social network analysis
- Co-authorship network
- Normalization
- Countries scientific collaboration
- Blockmodeling
- Post-Soviet countries