Notes
References
Bordignon, F., Chaignon, L., & Egret, D. (2023). Promoting narrative CVs to improve research evaluation? A review of opinion pieces and experiments. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvad013
Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002
Lucena, A.D. (2022). Negacionismo, anticiencia y pseudociencias: ¿en qué se diferencian? The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/negacionismo-anticiencia-y-pseudociencias-en-que-se-diferencian-174831
Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
Moed, H. F. (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7
Zacharewicz, T., Lepory, B., Reale, E., & Jonkers, K. (2019). Performance-based research funding in EU Member States: A comparative assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041
Wouters, P. (2014). The citation: From culture to infrastructure. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (pp. 47–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres-Salinas, D., Arroyo-Machado, W. & Robinson-Garcia, N. Bibliometric denialism. Scientometrics 128, 5357–5359 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04787-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04787-2