Abstract
Many small software organizations have recognized the need to improve their software product. Evaluating the software product alone seems insufficient since it is known that its quality is largely dependant on the process that is used to create it. Thus, small organizations are asking for evaluation of their software processes and products. The ISO/IEC 14598-5 standard is already used as a methodology basis for evaluating software products. This article explores how it can be combined with the CMMI to produce a methodology that can be tailored for process evaluation in order to improve their software processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averill, E. 1993. Software Capability Evaluation (SCE)Version 1.5 Method Description, Pittsburgh, July, eds Software Engineering institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: TheClassification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York, Toronto, (eds.) Longmans, Green.
CMMI Product Team, Appraisal Requirements for CMMISM, Version 1.1 (ARC, V 1.1). (2001). Pittsburgh, December, eds Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
CMMI Team Capability Maturity Model Integration for Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS), Version 1.1, Continuous Representation, 2001. Pittsburgh, December, eds. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Donaway, D.K. and Masters, S. 2001. CMM®-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Version 1.2 Method Description,. Pittsburgh, November, eds. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
ISO/IEC1 14598-5. 1998. Information Technology—Software Product Evaluation—Part 5: Process for Evaluators, International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/IEC 15504-2. 2003. Software engineering—Process assessment—Part 2: Performing an assessment, International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/IEC 9126-1. 2001. Software engineering—Product quality—Part 1: Qualitymodel, International Organization for Standardization.
Members of the Assessment Method Integrated Team, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) version 1.1: Method Definition Document, 2001. Pittsburgh, December, eds Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Paulk, M. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, February, (eds.) Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
SM: CMMI is a service mark of Carnegie-Mellon University.
Sylvie Trudel has over 20 years of experience in software. She worked for more than 10 years in development and implementation of management information systems and embedded real-time systems. Since 1996, she works as a process improvement specialist, implementing best practices into organizations processes from CMM and CMMI models. She performed several CMM and CMMI assessments and participated in many other CMM assessments such as CBA IPI, SCE, and other proprietary methods. She obtained a bachelors degree in computer science in 1986 from Laval University in Québec City and a Masters degree in Software Engineering at École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS) in Montréal. Sylvie is currently working as a software engineering advisor at the Centre de Recherche Informatique de Montréal (CRIM).
Jean-Marc Lavoie has been working in software development for over 10 years. He performed and published a comparative study between the guide to the SWEBOK and the CMMI in 2003. Jean-Marc obtained a bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering. He is pursuing a Masters degree in Software Engineering at École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS) in Montréal while working as a software architect at Trisotech.
Marie-Claude Pare has been working in software development for 7 years. Marie-Claude obtained a bachelor degree in Software Engineering from École Polytechnique in Montréal. She is pursuing a Masters degree in Software Engineering at École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS) in Montréal while working as a software engineer at Motorola GSG Canada.
Dr Witold Suryn is a Professor at the École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Canada (engineering school of the Université du Québec network of institutions) where he teaches graduate and undergraduate software engineering courses and conducts research in the domain of software quality engineering, software engineering body of knowledge and software engineering fundamental principles. Dr Suryn is also the principal researcher and the director of GELOG : IQUAL, the Software Quality Engineering Research Group at École de technologie supérieure. From October 2003 Dr. Suryn holds the position of the International Secretary of ISO/IEC SC7 – System and Software Engineering.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trudel, S., Lavoie, JM., Paré, MC. et al. PEM: The small company-dedicated software process quality evaluation method combining CMMISM and ISO/IEC 14598. Software Qual J 14, 7–23 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-5997-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-5997-8