Skip to main content
Log in

Events in Branching Time

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of event is one of the key notions of many theories dealing with causality or agency. In this paper we study different approaches to events that share the basic assumption that events can be analyzed fruitfully in branching-time structures. The terminological framework developed thereby may be helpful for further analyses in the fields of causality and agency and also in those fields of computational semantics, where similar concepts are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BACH, E., ‘The algebra of events’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 9:5–16, 1986. Reprinted in [6].

  2. BELNAP, N.D., ‘Branching space-time’, Synthese, 92:385–434, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BELNAP, N.D., M. PERLOFF, and M. Xu, Facing the Future: Agents and their Choices in our Indeterminist World, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BENNETT, J., Events and their Names, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 1988.

  5. CASATI, R., and A. VARZI. ‘Events’, in E. N. ZALTA, (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2002 Edition), CSLI, Stanford, 2002. URL http://plato.Stanford.edu/archives/fal!2002/entries/events/.

  6. CASATI, R., and A.C. VARZI, (eds.), Events, Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FORBES, G., ‘Time, events and modality’, in R. LE POIDEVIN AND M. MACBEATH, (eds.), The Philosophy of Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KIM, J., ‘Events as property exemplifications’, in M. BRAND AND D. WALTON, (eds.), Action Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976, pp. 159–177. Reprinted in [6].

  9. KUTSCHERA, F. v., ‘Causation’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22:563–588, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KUTSCHERA, F. v., ‘Sebastian’s strolls’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 45:75–88, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LEWIS, D.K., ‘Causation’, Journal of Philosophy, 70:556–567, 1973. Reprinted in [12].

  12. LEWIS, D.K., Philosophical Papers, volume II, Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LEWIS, D.K., ‘Causation as influence’, Journal of Philosophy, 97:182–197, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LOMBARD, L. B., Events: A Metaphysical Study, Routledge andKegan Paul, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LOMBARD, L.B., ‘Ontologies of events’, in S. LAURENCE AND C. MACDONALD, (eds.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1998, pp. 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MEIXNER, U., ‘Events and their reality’, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2:23–33, 1994. [17] MEIXNER, U., Theorie der Kausalitat, Mentis, Paderborn, 2001.

  17. MONTAGUE, R., ‘On the nature of certain philosophical entities’, The Monist, 53: 159–194, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PIANESI, F. and A. C. VARZI, ‘Events, topology, and temporal relations’, The Monist, 78(1):89–116, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. PRIOR, A., Past, Present and Future, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  20. QUINE, W. V. O., Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  21. RUNGGALDIER, E., Was sind Handlungen? Eine philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Naturalismus, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1996.

  22. SCHEFFLER, U., (ed.), Ereignis und Ze.it. Zur Ontologie der Kausalrelation, Logos, Berlin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SEGERBERG, K., ‘Getting started: Beginnings in the logic of action’, Studio, Logica, 51:347–378, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SIMONS, P., Parts: A Study in Ontology, Clarendon Press, 1987.

  25. SPOHN, W., M. LEDWIG, and M. ESFELD, (eds.), Current Issues in Causation, Mentis, Paderborn, 2001.

  26. THOMASON, R. H., ‘Combinations of tense and modality’, in D. M. GABBAY AND F. GUENTHNER, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Extensions of Classical Logic, volume II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  27. VAN BENTHEM, J., The Logic of Time, Reidel, 1983.

  28. VON WRIGHT, G.H., Causality and Determinism, Columbia University Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  29. WHITEHEAD, A. N. Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology, Macmillan, New York, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  30. WOLFL, S. ‘Review of Nuel Belnap, Michael Perloff, and Ming Xu’s Facing the Future’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2002. URL http://ndpr7icaap.org/content/archives/2002/8/wolfl-belnap.html.

  31. Xu, M., ‘Causation in branching time (I): Transitions, events and causes’, Synthese, 112(2):137–192, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Wölfl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wölfl, S. Events in Branching Time. Stud Logica 79, 255–282 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-2978-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-2978-z

Keywords

Navigation