Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peirce’s Contributions to Possible-Worlds Semantics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A century ago, Charles S. Peirce proposed a logical approach to modalities that came close to possible-worlds semantics. This paper investigates his views on modalities through his diagrammatic logic of Existential Graphs (EGs). The contribution of the gamma part of EGs to the study of modalities is examined. Some ramifications of Peirce’s remarks are presented and placed into a contemporary perspective. An appendix is included that provides a transcription with commentary of Peirce’s unpublished manuscript on modality from 1901.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayart, A., ‘La correction de la logique de modale du premier et second ordre S5’, Logique et Analyse 1:28–44, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, J., ‘Iterated modalities’, Philosophical Quarterly 5:45–56, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Copeland, B.J., ‘The genesis of possible worlds semantics’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 31:99–137, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drake, F. R., ‘On McKinsey’s syntactical characterizations of systems of modal logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 27:400–406, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guillaume, M., ‘Rapports entre calculs propositionnels modaux et topologie impliqués par certaines extensions de la méthode des tableaux sémantiques. Système de Feys-von Wright’, Comptes Rendus des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences 246:1140–1142, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hilpinen, R., ‘On C. S. Peirce’s theory of the proposition: Peirce as a precursor of game-theoretical semantics’, The Monist 65:182–188, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hintikka, J., ‘Modality as referential multiplicity’, Ajatus 20:49–64, 1957a.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hintikka, J., ‘Quantifiers in deontic logic’, Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commen-tationes Humanarum Litterarum 23, Helsinki, 1957b.

  9. Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1962. (Reprint edition London, King’s College Publication, 2005.)

  10. Hintikka, J., Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jhonsson, B., and A. Tarski, ‘Boolean algebras with operators’, American Journal of Mathematics 73:891–939, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanger, S., ‘The morning star paradox’, Theoria 23:1–11, 1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanger, S., Provability in Logic, Stockholm Studies in Philosophy 1, 1957.

  14. Kelly, G. A., The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York, 1955.

  15. Knuuttila, S., Modalities in Medieval Philosophy, Routledge, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krentel, W. D., J. C. C. McKinsey and W. V. Quine, ‘A simplification of games in extensive form’, Duke Mathematical Journal 18:885–900, 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kripke, S., ‘Semantical considerations on modal logic’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83–94, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn, H., ‘Extensive games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36:570–576, 1950.

  19. Lindström, S., ‘Quine’s interpretation problem and the early development of possible worlds semantics’, in E. Carlson and R. Sliwinski (eds.), Omnium-gatherum. Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Jan Österberg on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birth-day Uppsala Philosophical Studies, Uppsala, 2001.

  20. MacColl, H., ‘The calculus of equivalent statements (fifth paper)’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 28:156–183, 1886–1887.

  21. McKinsey, J. C. C., ‘On the syntactical construction of systems of modal logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 10:83–94, 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McKinsey, J. C. C., ‘Notes on games in extensive form’, Research Memorandum 157, 1950.

  23. Meredith, C. A., ‘Interpretations of different modal logics in the ‘property calculus’, mimeographed manuscript, Canterbury University College (with attribution ‘C. A. M., August 1956; recorded and expanded A. N. P.’). Reprinted as C.A. Meredith and A.N. Prior, ‘Interpretations of Different Modal Logics in the ‘Property Calculus’’, in B. J. Copeland (ed.), Logic and Reality: Essays on the Legacy of Arthur Prior, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 133–134.

  24. Montague, R. and Kalish, D., ‘That’, Philosophical Studies 10:54–61, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan, C. G., ‘Modality, analogy, and ideal experiments according to C.S. Peirce’, Synthese 41:65–83, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior John Wiley, New York, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Øhrstrøm, P., ‘C. S. Peirce and the quest for gamma graphs’, in Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1257, Springer, Berlin,357–370, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peirce, C. S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 8 vols., ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (vols. 1–6), and A. W. Burks (vols. 7–8), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1931–1958.

  29. Peirce, C. S., ‘Manuscripts’ in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by R. Robin Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusettes Press, 1967), and in ‘The Peirce Papers: A supplementary catalogue’, Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 7:37–57, 1971.

  30. Peirce, C. S., ‘Modality’, in J. M. Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology vol. 2, Thoemmes Press, Bristol, 1998, pp. 645–650. (First appeared in 1901, Macmillan, The Macmillan Company New York and London, pp. 89–93. Partially available at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Baldwin/Dictionary/)

  31. Pietarinen, A.-V., Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Synthese Library, Vol. 329, Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pietarinen, A.-V., ‘Compositionality, relevance, and Peirce’s logic of existential graphs’, Axiomathes 15:513–540, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rabin, M.O., ‘Effective computability of winning strategies’, in M. Dresher A.W. Tucker and P. Wolfe (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957, pp. 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  34. de Rijke, M., ‘The logic of Peirce algebras’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4:227–250, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts, D.D., The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce The Hague, Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zeman, J. J., The Graphical Logic of C.S. Peirce dissertation, University of Chicago. (Online edition, 2002, http://web.clas.ufl.edu/users/jzeman/)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 9, FIN-00014, Helsinki

    Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen

Authors
  1. Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pietarinen, AV. Peirce’s Contributions to Possible-Worlds Semantics. Stud Logica 82, 345–369 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-8102-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-8102-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation