Skip to main content
Log in

On Dynamic Topological and Metric Logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate computational properties of propositional logics for dynamical systems. First, we consider logics for dynamic topological systems (W.f), fi, where W is a topological space and f a homeomorphism on W. The logics come with ‘modal’ operators interpreted by the topological closure and interior, and temporal operators interpreted along the orbits {w, f(w), f2 (w), ˙˙˙} of points w ε W. We show that for various classes of topological spaces the resulting logics are not recursively enumerable (and so not recursively axiomatisable). This gives a ‘negative’ solution to a conjecture of Kremer and Mints. Second, we consider logics for dynamical systems (W, f), where W is a metric space and f and isometric function. The operators for topological interior/closure are replaced by distance operators of the form ‘everywhere/somewhere in the ball of radius a, ‘for a ε Q +. In contrast to the topological case, the resulting logic turns out to be decidable, but not in time bounded by any elementary function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandroff, P. S., ‘Diskrete Räume’, Matematicheskii Sbornik, 2 (44):501–518, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artemov, S., J. Davoren, and A. Nerode, Modal logics and topological semantics for hybrid systems, Technical Report MSI 97-05, Cornell University, 1997.

  3. Bourbaki, N., General Topology, Part 1, Hermann, Paris and Addison-Wesley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J. R., Ergodic Theory and Topological Dynamics, Academic Press, 1976.

  5. Büchi, J. R., ‘On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic’, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford University Press, 1962, pp. 1–11.

  6. Davoren, J., and A. Nerode, ‘Logics for hybrid systems’, Proceedings of the IEEE, 88:985–1010, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabbay, D., A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications, vol. 148 of Studies in Logic, Elsevier, 2003.

  8. Gabelaia, D., A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, ‘Non-primitive recursive decidability of products of modal logics with expanding domains’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 142:245–268, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabelaia, D., R. Kontchakov, A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, ‘Combining spatial and temporal logics: expressiveness vs. complexity’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 23:167–243, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hopcroft, J., R. Motwani, and J. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison–Wesley, 2001.

  11. Katok, A., and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, vol. 54 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Elsevier, 1995.

  12. B. Konev, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, ‘Temporal logics over transitive states’, in Procceedings ofthe 20th International Conference on Automated Deduction CADE-20, vol. 3632 of LNAI, 2005, pp. 182–203.

  13. Kremer, P., ‘Temporal logic over S4: an axiomatizable fragment of dynamic topological logic’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 3:375–376, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kremer, P., and G. Mints, ‘Dynamic topological logic’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 3:371–372, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kremer, P., and G. Mints, ‘Dynamic topological logic’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 1-3 (131):133–158, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kremer, P., G. Mints, and V. Rybakov, ‘Axiomatizing the next-interior fragment of dynamic topological logic’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 3:376–377, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kutz, O., H. Sturm, N.-Y. Suzuki, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, ‘Logics of metric spaces’, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 4:260–294, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McKinsey, J.C.C., and A. Tarski, ‘The algebra of topology’, Annals of Mathematics, 45:141–191, 1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moor, T., and J. Davoren, ‘Robust controller synthesis for hybrid systems using modal logics’, in M.D. Di Benedetto and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli (eds.), Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC'01), vol. 2034 of LNCS. Springer, 2001, pp. 433–446.

  20. Post, E., ‘A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem’, Bulletin of the AMS, 52:264–268, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Slavnov, S., Two counterexamples in the logic of dynamic topological systems, Technical Report TR–2003015, Cornell University, 2003.

  22. Walters, P., An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Konev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konev, B., Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F. et al. On Dynamic Topological and Metric Logics. Stud Logica 84, 129–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-9005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-9005-x

Keywords

Navigation