Skip to main content
Log in

Subgames within Large Games and the Heuristic of Imitation

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study repeated normal form games where the number of players is large. We argue that it is interesting to look at such games as being divided into subgames, each of which we call a neighbourhood. The structure of such a game is given by a graph G whose nodes are players and edges denote visibility. The neighbourhoods are maximal cliques in G. The game proceeds in rounds where in each round the players of every clique X of G play a strategic form game among each other. A player at a node v strategises based on what she can observe, i.e., the strategies and the outcomes in the previous round of the players at vertices adjacent to v. Based on this, the player may switch strategies in the same neighbourhood, or migrate to another neighbourhood.

We are interested in addressing questions regarding the eventual stability of such games. We incrementally impose constraints on the ‘types’ of the players. First, we look at players who are unconstrained in their strategising abilities, in that, players who may use unbounded memory. We then consider the case of memoryless players. We show that in both these cases the eventual stability of the game can be characterised in terms of potentials. We then introduce a simple modal logic in which the types of the players can be specified. We show that when the players play according to these specified types, it can be effectively decided whether the game stabilises. Finally, we look at the important heuristic of imitation. Simple imitative strategies can be specified in the logic introduced by us. We show that in a population of optimisers and imitators, we can decide how ‘worse-off’ the imitators are by playing imitative strategies rather than optimal ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackermann, H., S. Fischer, P. Berenbrink, and M. Hoefer, Concurrent imitation dynamics in congestion games, 2008.

  2. Ackermann, H., H. Röglin, and B. Vöcking, On the impact of combinatorial structure on congestion games, in In Proc. of the 47th Ann. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2006, pp. 613–622.

  3. Banerjee A.V.: A simple model of herd behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(3), 797–817 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema, Modal logic, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001.

  5. Blonski M.: Anonymous games with binary actions. Games and Economic Behaviour 28, 171–180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blonski M.: Characterisation of pure strategy equilibria in finite anonymous games. Journal of Mathematical Economics 34, 225–233 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandt F., Fischer F., Holzer M., Symmetries and the complexity of pure nash equilibrium. Journal of computer and system sciences 75(3), 163–177 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daskalakis, C., and C. H. Papadimitriou, Computing equilibria in anonymous games, in Proceedings of the 48th symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007, pp. 83–93.

  9. Elkind, E., L. A. Goldberg, and P. W. Goldberg, Equilibria in graphical games on trees revisited, in Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM-EC), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 100–109.

  10. Elkind, E., L. A. Goldberg, and P. W. Goldberg, Computing good nash equilibria in graphical games, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM-EC), ACM Press, 2007, pp. 162–171.

  11. Fink, A. M., Equilibrium in a stochastic n-person game. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University 28, 89–93 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kearns, M. J., M. L. Littman, and S. P. Singh, An efficient, exact algorithm for solving tree-structured graphical games, in NIPS, 2001, pp. 817–823.

  13. Kearns, M. J., M. L. Littman, and S. P. Singh, Graphical models for game theory, in UAI, 2001, pp. 253–260.

  14. Levine, D. K., and W. Pesendorfer, The evolution of cooperation through imitation. Games and Economic Behaviour 58(2), 293–315 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monderer, D., and L. S. Shapley, Potential games, Games and Economic Behaviour 14,124–143 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paul, S., and R. Ramanujam, Imitation in large games, in Proceedings of the first international symposium on games, automata, logics and verification (GandALF), Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, 2010, pp. 162–172.

  17. Paul, S., and R. Ramanujam, Neighbourhood structure in large games, in Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), 2011, pp. 181–190.

  18. Paul, S., R. Ramanujam, and S. Simon, Dynamic restriction of choices: A preliminary logical report, in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), 2009, pp. 218–226.

  19. Paul, S., R. Ramanujam, and S. Simon, Stability under strategy switching, in B. Löwe, K. Ambos-Spies, and W. Merkle, (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Computability in Europe (CiE), vol. 5635 of LNCS, 2009, pp. 389–398.

  20. Peyton Young, H., The evolution of conventions, in Econometrica, vol. 61, Blackwell Publishing, 1993, pp. 57–84.

  21. Peyton Young, H., The diffusion of innovations in social networks, Economics Working Paper Archive 437, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics, 2000.

  22. Schlag, K. S., Why imitate, and if so, how? a boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits, Journal of Economic Theory 130–156, 1998.

  23. Shapley L.: Stochastic games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 39, 1095–1100 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, J. M., Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, 1982.

  25. Weibull, J. W., Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ramanujam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, S., Ramanujam, R. Subgames within Large Games and the Heuristic of Imitation. Stud Logica 102, 361–388 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-014-9549-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-014-9549-0

Keywords

Navigation