Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Parallel spatiotemporal autocorrelation and visualization system for large-scale remotely sensed images

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Current studies on large-scale remotely sensed images are of great national importance for monitoring and evaluating global climate and ecological changes. In particular, real time distributed high-performance visualization and computation have become indispensable research components in facilitating the extraction of remotely sensed image textures to enable mining spatiotemporal patterns and dynamics of landscapes from massive geo-digital information collected from satellites. Remotely sensed images are usually highly correlated with rich landscape features. By exploiting the structures of these images and extracting their textures, fundamental insights of the landscape can be derived. Furthermore, the interdisciplinary collaboration on the remotely sensed image analysis demands multifarious expertise in a wide spectrum of fields including geography, computer science, and engineering.

This paper develops a Distributed Computing System for Remotely Sensed Images framework (DCSRI) to support distributed and high performance computing for geospatial images. A new algorithm supporting parallel computing with dynamic workload balance for large images, namely Variogram-based Image Texture Extractor (VITE) for extracting image texture from massive and dynamic digital remotely sensed images is presented. The VITE algorithm is used to represent and transform the original data into image textures. The DCSRI framework has the capacity to perform high performance computing on Linux clusters or supercomputers to address the intensive computing challenges arising from large and multiple images. Advanced web technology is also exploited to enable interactive user experience with prompt visual feedback as well as good interoperability. Users can also dynamically steer the visualization and computation process by adjusting the computing parameters on-the-fly. This system leads to a great reduction of image data and provides useful information for knowledge discovery and digital image classification in a user friendly and computing efficient way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson PM, Aplin P, Curran PJ (1999) Per-field classification of land use using the forthcoming very fine spatial resolution satellite sensors: problems and potential solutions. In: Advanced in remote sensing and GIS analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson PM, Curran PJ (1997) Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63(12):1345–1351

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson PM, Lewis PM (2000) Image classification and analysis using integrated gis. Advances in remote sensing and gis analysis. Comput Geosci 26:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berberoglu S, Lloyd CD, Atkinson PM, Curran PJ (2000) The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean. Comput Geosci 26(4):385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burrough PA, McDonnell R (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carr JR (1996) Spectral and textural classification of single and multiple band digital images. Comput Geosci 22:849–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr JR, Miranda FP (1998) The semivariogram in comparison to the co-occurrence matrix for classification of image texture. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36:1945–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen DM, Stow D (2002) The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(11):1155–1161

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernandez F (2000) Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Comput Geosci 26:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coburn CA, Roberts ACB (2004) A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification. Int J Remote Sens 25(20):4287–4308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Bradshaw GA (1990) Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Remote Sens Environ 34:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cressie N, Huang HC (1999) Classes of nonseparable, spatiotemporal stationary covariance functions. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1330–1340

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Curran PJ (1988) The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction. Remote Sens Environ 32:493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curran PJ, Atkinson PM (1998) Geostatistics and remote sensing. Prog Phys Geogr 22:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dungan JL, Peterson DL, Curran PJ (1994) Alternative approaches for mapping vegetation quantities using ground and image data. In: Environmental information management and analysis. Taylor and Francis, Bristol, pp 237–261

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuentes M (2006) Testing for separability of spatial-temporal covariance functions. J Stat Plan Inference 136:447–466

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herzfeld UC, Higginson CA (1996) Automated geostatistical seafloor classification-principles parameters feature vectors and discrimination criteria. Comput Geosci 22:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hinton JC (1999) Image classification and analysis using integrated gis. In: Advances in remote sensing and gis analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen JR (2005) Introductory digital image processing. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnsson K (1994) Segment-based land-use classification from spot satellite data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(1):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kyriakidis PC, Journel AG (1999) Geostatistical space–time models: a review. Math Geol 31:651–684

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lloyd CD, Berberoglu S, Curran PJ, Atkinson PM (2004) A comparison of texture measures for the per-field classification of Mediterranean land cover. Int J Remote Sens 25(19):3943–3965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mezzacappa A (2005) Scidac 2005: Scientific discovery through advanced computing. J Phys Conf Ser 16

  25. Miranda FP, Carr JR (1994) Application of the semivariogram textural classifier (stc) for vegetation discrimination using sir-b data of the Guiana shield. Northwestern Brazil Remote Sens Rev 10:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miranda FP, Fonseca LEN, Carr JR (1998) Semivariogram texture classification of jers-1 (fuyo-1) sar data obtained over a flooded area of the amazon rainforest. Int J Remote Sens 19(3):549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miranda FP, Macdonald JA, Carr JR (1992) Application of the semivariogram textural classifier (stc) for vegetation discrimination using sir-b data of Borneo. Int J Remote Sens 13(12):2349–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell MW, Genton MG, Gumpertz ML (2005) Testing for separability of space-time covariances. Environmetrics 16:819–831

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. High performance networks for high-impact science. Report of the high-performance network planning workshop, August 2002

  30. Ramstein G, Raffy M (1989) Analysis of the structure of radiometric remotely-sensed images. Int J Remote Sens 10:1049–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriǵuez-Iturbe I, Mejá JM (1974) The design of rainfall networks in time and space. Water Resour Res 10:713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290:2323–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Skøien JO, Blöschl G (2006) Catchments as space-time filters—a joint spatio-temporal geostatistical analysis of runoff and precipitation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:941–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wallace CSA, Marsh SE (2005) Characterizing the spatial structure of endangered species habitat using geostatistical analysis of ikonos imagery. Int J Remote Sens 26(12):2607–2629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang G, Gertner GZ, Howard H, Anderson AB (2008) Optimal spatial resolution for collection of ground data and multi-sensor image mapping of a soil erosion cover factor. J Environ Manag 88:1088–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gertner GZ, Xiao X, Wente S, Wang G, Anderson AB (2001) Appropriate plot size and spatial resolution for mapping multiple vegetation cover types. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67(5):575–584

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilkinson B, Allen M (2005) Parallel programming techniques and applications using networked workstations and parallel computers. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zha H, Zhang Z (2007) Continuum isomap for manifold learnings. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:184–200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA

    Mengxia Zhu

  2. Geography Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA

    Guangxing Wang & Tonny Oyana

Authors
  1. Mengxia Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangxing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tonny Oyana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengxia Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, M., Wang, G. & Oyana, T. Parallel spatiotemporal autocorrelation and visualization system for large-scale remotely sensed images. J Supercomput 59, 83–103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-010-0420-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-010-0420-4

Keywords