Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardisation advancements in the area of routing for mobile ad-hoc networks

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are self-organized and fully distributed networks that rely on the collaboration of participating devices to route data from source to destination. The MANET paradigm is expected to enable ubiquitous mobile communication and thus the proliferation of pervasive applications. The MANET Working Group (WG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is responsible for standardizing an appropriate Internet Protocol (IP) based routing protocol functionality for both static (mesh) and dynamic (mobile) wireless ad hoc network topologies. In this paper, we provide a background on the possibility to use MANETs for enabling future pervasive internet and innovative ubiquitous services. We also describe the work achieved by the MANET WG thus far on the area of secure unicast and multicast routing for MANETs. We also examine non-IETF work on this area, chiefly based on adaptive and hybrid routing. The paper then presents comparative performance evaluations of discussed routing protocols. It is mainly observed that there is a need for adaptive hybrid routing approaches in order to support future innovative and pervasive applications. Consequently, we present our conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruno R, Conti M, Gregori E (2005) Mesh networks: commodity multihop ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun Mag 43(3):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun D, Buford J, Fish R, Gelman A, Kaplan A, Khandelwal R, Narayanan S, Shim E, Yu H (2008) UP2P: a peer-to-peer overlay architecture for ubiquitous communications and networking. IEEE Commun Mag 46(12):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corson S, Macker J (1999) Mobile ad hoc networking (MANET): routing protocol performance issues and evaluation considerations. Informational, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2501.txt

  4. Burbank JL, Chimento PF, Haberman BK, Kasch WT (2006) Key challenges of military tactical networking and the elusive promise of MANET technology. IEEE Commun Mag 44(11):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Conti M, Giordano S (2007) Multihop ad hoc networking: the reality. IEEE Commun Mag 45(4):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan S-P, Kok C, Wong AK (2005) Multimedia streaming gateway with jitter detection. IEEE Trans Multimed 7(3):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clausen T, Dearlove C, Dean J, Adjih C (2009) RFC5444: generalized mobile ad hoc network (MANET) packet/message format. Std. track, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5444.txt

  8. Clausen T, Jacquet P (2003) RFC3626: optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). Experimental, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt

  9. Clausen T, Dearlove C (2009) RFC5497: representing multi-value time in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Std. track, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5497.txt

  10. Chakeres I (2009) RFC5498: IANA allocations for mobile ad hoc network (MANET) protocols. Std. track, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5498.txt

  11. Clausen T, Dearlove C, Adamson B (2008) RFC5148: jitter considerations in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Informational, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5148.txt

  12. Hajji H (2005) Statistical analysis of network traffic for adaptive faults detection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(5):1053–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clausen T, Dearlove C, Dean J (2011) RFC6130: MANET neighborhood discovery protocol (NHDP). Std. track, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6130.txt

  14. Ogier R, Templin F, Lewis M (2004) Topology dissemination based on reverse-path forwarding (TBRPF). Experimental, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3684.txt

  15. Johnson D, Hu Y, Maltz D (2007) The dynamic source routing protocol (DSR). Experimental, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4728.txt

  16. Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) RFC3561: ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Experimental, [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt

  17. Abusalah L, Khokhar A, Guizani M (2008) A survey of secure mobile ad hoc routing protocols. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 10(4):78–93

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Lee W (2000) Intrusion detection in wireless ad-hoc networks. In: Proc ACM MOBIHOC 2000, pp. 275–283

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu W, Sun Y, Liu KJR (2005) HADOF: defense against routing disruptions in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proc IEEE INFOCOM 2005, vol 2, pp 1252–1261

    Google Scholar 

  20. De Couto D, Aguayo D, Bicket J, Morris R (2003) A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In: Proc ninth annual international conf. on mobile computing and networking. ACM Mobicom, vol 3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pathak H, Dutta R (2010) A survey of network design problems and joint design approaches in wireless mesh networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor PP(99):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Akyildiz IF, Wang X, Wang W (2005) Wireless mesh networks: a survey. Comput Netw 47(4):445–487

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Samar P, Pearlman MR, Haas ZJ (2004) Independent zone routing: an adaptive hybrid routing framework for ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 12(4): 595–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bisnik N, Abouzeid A (2009) Queuing network models for delay analysis of multihop wireless ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 7(1):79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Groenevelt R, Nain P, Koole G (2005) The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks. Perform Eval 62:210–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Crowcroft J (1996) Quality-of-service routing for supporting multimedia applications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 14:1228–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramrekha TA, Politis C (2010) A hybrid adaptive routing protocol for extreme emergency ad hoc communication. In: Proceedings of 19th IEEE International Conference Computer Communications And Networks (ICCCN), pp 1–6, 2–5 August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramrekha TA, Millar GP, Politis C (2011) A model for designing scalable and efficient adaptive routing approaches in emergency ad hoc communications. In: IEEE Symposium on Computers And Communications (ISCC), pp 916-923, 28 June–1 July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chai WK, Wang N, Psaras I, Pavlou G, Wang C, Garcia de Blas G, Ramon-Salguero FJ, Liang L, Spirou S, Beben A, Hadjioannou E (2011) Curling: content-ubiquitous resolution and delivery infrastructure for next-generation services. IEEE Commun Mag 49(3):112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tipu Arvind Ramrekha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramrekha, T.A., Panaousis, E. & Politis, C. Standardisation advancements in the area of routing for mobile ad-hoc networks. J Supercomput 64, 409–434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0705-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0705-2

Keywords