Skip to main content
Log in

Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI data based on network motifs

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring effective connectivity between neuronal assemblies at different temporal and spatial scales is an important issue in human brain research from the perspective of pervasive computing. At the same time, network motifs play roles in network classification and analysis of structural network properties. This paper develops a method of analyzing the effective connectivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data by using network motifs. Firstly, the directed interactions between fMRI time-series are analyzed based on Granger causality analysis (GCA), by which the complex network is built up to reveal the causal relationships among different brain regions. Then the effective connectivity in complex network is described with a variety of network motifs, and the statistical properties of fMRI data are characterized according to the network motifs topological parameters. Finally, the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is feasible in testing and measuring the effective connectivity of fMRI data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uludag K, Dubowitz DJ, Yoder EJ et al (2004) Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI. Neuroimage 23:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song, M., Jiang, T (2012) A review of functional magnetic resonance imaging for Brainnetome. Neurosci Bull 28:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rombouts SA, Goekoop R, Stam CJ et al (2005) Delayed rather than decreased BOLD response as a marker for early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 26:1078–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceballos-Baumann AO (2003) Functional imaging in Parkinson’s disease: activation studies with PET, fMRI and SPECT. J Neurol 250:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A (2003) Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith SM (2012) The future of fMRI connectivity. NeuroImage 62:1257–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klaas, ES, Roebroeck A (2012) A short history of causal modeling of fMRI data. NeuroImage 62:856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waldorp L, Christoffels I, van de Ven V (2011) Effective connectivity of fMRI data using ancestral graph theory: dealing with missing regions. NeuroImage 54:2695–2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valdes-Sosa PA, Roebroeck A, Daunizeau J et al (2011) Effective connectivity: influence, causality and biophysical modeling. NeuroImage 58:339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marinazzo D, Liao W, Chen H et al (2011) Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality. NeuroImage 58:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zang Z-X, Yan C-G, Dong Z-Y et al (2012) Granger causality analysis implementation on MATLAB: a graphic user interface toolkit for fMRI data processing. J Neurosci Methods 203:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton JP, Chen G, Thomason ME et al (2011) Investigating neural primacy in major depressive disorder: multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI time-series data. Mol Psychiatry 16:763–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiao Q, Lu GM, Zhang Z, Zhong Y et al (2011) Granger causal influence predicts BOLD activity levels in the default mode network. Hum Brain Mapp 32:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Handwerker DA, Roopchansingh V, Gonzalez-Castillo J et al (2012) Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity. NeuroImage 63:1712–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao, W, Ding J, Marinazzo D (2011) Small-world directed networks in the human brain: multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI. NeuroImage 54:2683–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldorp L, Christoffels I, van de Ven V (2011) Effective connectivity of fMRI data using ancestral graph theory: dealing with missing regions. NeuroImage 54:2695–2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S et al (2002) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298:824–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milo R, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N et al (2004) Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks. Science 303:1538–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang C-Y, Cheng C-Y, Sun C-T (2007) Bridge and brick network motifs: identifying significant building blocks from complex biological systems. Artif Intell Med 41:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato JR, Fujita A, Cardoso EF (2010) Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage 52:1444–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R (2005) Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 25:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones RH (2011) Bayesian information criterion for longitudinal and clustered data. Stat Med 30:3050–3056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe S (2010) Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. J Mach Learn Res 11:3571–3594

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Salehi M, Rabiee HR, Jalili M (2010) Motif structure and cooperation in real-world complex networks. Physica A 389:5521–5529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ribeiro P, Silva F, Lopes L (2012) Parallel discovery of network motifs. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Itzhack R, Mogilevski Y, Louzoun Y (2007) An optimal algorithm for counting network motifs. Physica A 381:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Castro NC, Azevedo PJ (2012) Significant motifs in time series. Stat Anal Data Min 5:35–53

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the open project of the State Key Laboratory of Robotics and System at Harbin Institute of Technology (SKLRS-2010-2D-09, SKLRS-2010-MS-10), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51307010, 61201096), University Natural Science Research Program of Jiangsu Province (13KJB510002), Natural Science Foundation of Changzhou City (CJ20110023), and Changzhou High-tech Research Key Laboratory Project (CM20123006). The authors are also very grateful to School of Information Science and Engineering, Changzhou University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng-Hua Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiao, ZQ., Zou, L., Cao, Y. et al. Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI data based on network motifs. J Supercomput 67, 806–819 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-1010-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-1010-z

Keywords

Navigation