Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation framework design for smart sensor business

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RFID is a technology to identify objects such as products and things with radio frequencies, which is recognized as a basic technology to realize ubiquitous society and has attracted significant attention of government, industries, and academic world. In addition, RFID has an enormous ripple effect as a killer application on a variety of business areas including logistics/distribution, military, or food/safety in particular because of a high identification rate, contactless identification media, propagation range, and scalability being able to connect and communicate with other communication networks. But there are insufficient studies of analyzing quantitative effects on economic effectiveness generated after implementing RFIDs through empirical analysis. Therefore, this study analyzed economic effect that can be obtained by implementing RFIDs into companies. Based on the study results, common effects were concentrated on the primary benefit, and the administration and management work had common effects of the third benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amirijoo M, Hansson J, Son SH, Gunnarsson S (2007) Experimental evaluation of linear time-invariant models for feedback performance control in real-time systems. Real-Time Syst 3(3):209–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjork A, Erlandsson M, Hakli J, Jaakkola K, Nilsson A, Nummila K, Puntanen V, Sirkka A (2011) Monitoring environmental performance of the forestry supply chain using RFID. Comput Ind 62(8–9):830–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen A-S, Leung MT (2005) Performance evaluation of neural network architectures: the case of predicting foreign exchange correlations. J Forecast 24(6):403–420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng X, Linus J (2005) A performance evaluation of a novel energy-aware data-centric routing algorithm in wireless sensor networks. J Wirel Netw 11(5):619–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuanmin H, Feng L, Lee ZP (2012) Evaluation of GOCI sensitivity for at-sensor radiance and GDPS-retrieved chlorophyll-a products. Ocean Sci J 47(3):279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das Sajal K, Reyes Arthur A (2002) An approach to integrating HLA federations and genetic algorithms to support automatic design evaluation for multi-agent systems. Sim Pract Theory 9(3–5):167–192

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng J, Han R, Mishra S (2003) A performance evaluation of intrusion-tolerant routing in wireless sensor networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2634:349–364

  8. Fernandes P, Sales A, Santos AR, Webber T (2011) Performance evaluation of software development teams: a practical case study. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 275(27):73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan L, Wang X, Awan I (2010) Performance modelling and evaluation of telecommunication systems. Telecommun Syst 45(4):259–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernández-Muñoz JM, Vercher JB, Muñoz L, Galache JA, Presser M, Hernández LA, Gómez JP (2011) Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6656:447–462

  11. Isaac JT, Zeadally S, Sierra JC (2010) Implementation and performance evaluation of a payment protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. Electron Commer Res 10(2):209–233

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Johns J, Petrik M, Mahadevan S (2009) Hybrid least-squares algorithms for approximate policy evaluation. Mach Learn 76(2–3):243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang BJ, Kim HS, Kim E-H, Kim H-S, Im EG (2011) RFID authentication protocol for low-cost RFID tags. Inf J 14(6):2041–2060

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy S, Stewart R, Jacob P, Molloy O (2011) StoRHm: a protocol adapter for mapping SOAP based web services to RESTful HTTP format. Electron Commer Res 11(3):245–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerr R, Cohen R (2010) TREET: the trust and reputation experimentation and evaluation testbed. Electron Commer Res 10(3–4):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li P, Tu M, Yen I-L, Xia Z (2007) Preference update for e-commerce applications: model, language, and processing. Electron Commer Res 7(1):17–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Luss H, Neidhardt AL, Krishnan KR (2009) An adaptive automated method for identity verification with performance guarantees. Electron Commer Res 9(3):225–242

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch RL, Cross KF (1995) Measure up! How to measure corporate performance, 2nd edn. Blackwell Business, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Măruşter L, van Beest NRTP (2009) Redesigning business processes: a methodology based on simulation and process mining techniques. Knowl Inf Syst 21(3):267–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Menzel K, Pesch D, O’Flynn B, Keane M, O’Mathuna C (2008) Towards a wireless sensor platform for energy efficient building operation. Tsinghua Sci Technol 13(1):381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra D, Reddy SS, Veeramani D (2005) Performance evaluation of multi-object auctions. Electron Commer Res 5(2):293–307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ngai EWT, Moon KKL, Riggins FJ, Yi CY (2010) RFID research: an academic literature review and future research directions. Int J Prod Econ 112(2):510–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noppen J, van den Broek P, Akşit M (2008) Software development with imperfect information. Soft Comput 12(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Núñez-Sánchez R, Barge-Gil A, Modrego-Rico A (2012) Performance of knowledge interactions between public research centres and industrial firms in Spain: a project-level analysis. J Technol Transf 37(3):330–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oracle (2004) RFID and Sensor-Based Services, Real-Time Information Management, Oracle Corporation, 020419, pp 41

  26. Reijers HA, Song M, Jeong B (2009) Analysis of a collaborative workflow process with distributed actors. Inf Syst Front 11(3):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rybski PE, Larson A, Veeraraghavan H, Anderson M, Gini M (2008) Performance evaluation of a multi-robot search & retrieval system: experiences with MinDART. J Intell Robot Syst 52(3–4):363–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott JT (2009) Cost-benefit analysis for global public–private partnerships: an evaluation of the desirability of intergovernmental organizations entering into public-private partnerships. J Technol Transf 34:525–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharaf MA, Nafey AS, Garcia-Rodriguez L (2011) Exergy and thermo-economic analyses of a combined solar organic cycle with multi effect distillation (MED) desalination process. Desalination 272(1–3):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vijayaraman BS, Osyk BA (2006) An empirical study of RFID implementation in the warehousing industry. Int J Logist Manag 17(1):6–20. doi:10.1108/09574090610663400

  31. Wu NC, Nystrom MA, Lin TR, Yu HC (2006) Challenges to global RFID adoption. Technovation 26(12):1317–1323

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Human Resources Development (No. 20154030200860) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Security, College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, 06974, Korea

    Hangbae Chang

Authors
  1. Hangbae Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hangbae Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, H. Performance evaluation framework design for smart sensor business. J Supercomput 74, 4481–4496 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2130-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2130-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation