Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Research on suboptimal energy balance of non-uniform distributed nodes in WSN

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are widely used in industrial production, environmental monitoring, and military applications. In the process of using, the node non-uniform distribution strategy can mitigate the energy hole and node suboptimal energy balance technology in wireless sensor networks. This paper discusses this strategy theoretically, proposes a node non-uniform distribution strategy, and it constructs a suboptimal energy balance algorithm, which based on the non-uniform distribution theory system. It has proved that in the circular network with non-uniform distribution of nodes, the uniform distributed method and the random non-uniform distributed method are tested and compared. The experimental results show that the non-uniform distributed method has high efficiency and good scalability, and it can be used to achieve the suboptimal energy balance. The simulation results also show that the nodes in the WSN are almost equal to the energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yildiz HU, Bicakci K, Tavli B, Gultekin H, Incebacak D (2016) Maximizing wireless sensor network lifetime by communication/computation energy optimization of non-repudiation security service: node level versus network level strategies. Ad Hoc Netw 37:301–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma R, Lobiyal DK (2015) Energy holes avoiding techniques in sensor networks: a survey. Int J Eng Trends Technol 20(4):204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cayirpunar O, Kadioglu-Urtis E, Tavli B (2015) Optimal base station mobility patterns for wireless sensor network lifetime maximization. IEEE Sens J 15(11):6592–6603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shu Y, Yousefi H, Cheng P, Chen J, Gu YJ, He T, Shin KG (2016) Near-optimal velocity control for mobile charging in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 15(7):1699–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rani S, Malhotra J, Talwar R (2015) Energy efficient chain based cooperative routing protocol for WSN. Appl Soft Comput 35:386–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cayirpunar O, Tavli B, Kadioglu-Urtis E, Uludag S (2017) Optimal mobility patterns of multiple base stations for wireless sensor network lifetime maximization. IEEE Sens J 17(21):7177–7188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jan B, Farman H, Javed H, Montrucchio B, Khan M, Ali S (2017) Energy efficient hierarchical clustering approaches in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2017(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ku ML, Li W, Chen Y, Liu KR (2016) Advances in energy harvesting communications: past, present, and future challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 18(2):1384–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jia J, Chen J, Deng Y, Wang X, Aghvami AH (2017) Joint power charging and routing in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. Sensors 17(10):2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohamed RE, Ghanem WR, Khalil AT, Elhoseny M, Sajjad M, Mohamed MA (2018) energy efficient collaborative proactive routing protocol for wireless sensor network. Comput Netw 34(142):154–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yildiz HU, Tavli B, Yanikomeroglu H (2016) Transmission power control for link-level handshaking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 16(2):561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Mohapatra P (2005) An analytical model for the energy hole in many-to-one sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Dallas, TX, 2005, pp 2721–2725

  13. Lian J, Chen L, Naik K, Otzu T, Agnew G (2004) Modeling and enhancing the data capacity of wireless sensor networks. In: Phoha S, La Porta TF, Griffin C (eds) IEEE monograph on sensor network operations, IEEE Press, vol 13, issue 7, pp 376–379

  14. Olariu S, Stojmenovic I (2006) Design guidelines for maximizing lifetime and avoiding energy holes in sensor networks with uniform distribution and uniform reporting. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, 2006, pp 1–12

  15. Lian J, Naik K, Agnew G (2006) Data capacity improvement of wireless sensor networks using non-uniform sensor distribution. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2(2):121–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shan-shan M, Jian-sheng Q (2014) Energy balanced non-uniform distribution node scheduling algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Appl Math Inf Sci 8(4):1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gherbi C, Aliouat Z, Benmohammed M (2017) A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sens Rev 37(1):12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Zhang Y, Liu H, Su X (2015) Inhomogeneous distribution strategy based on mobile sink nodes in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 83(1):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keskin ME, Altınel IK, Aras N, Ersoy C (2016) Wireless sensor network design by lifetime maximisation: an empirical evaluation of integrating major design issues and sink mobility. Int J Sens Netw 20(3):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De D, Das SK (2015) SREE-tree: self-reorganizing energy-efficient tree topology management in sensor networks. In: 2015 Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability, SustainIT 2015, Madrid, Spain, April 14–15, 2015, vol 34. IEEE, pp 1–8

  21. Raval G, Bhavsar M, Patel N (2017) Enhancing data delivery with density controlled clustering in wireless sensor networks. Microsyst Technol 23(3):613–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Essa A, Al-Dubai AY, Romdhani I, Eshaftri MA (2017) A new dynamic weight-based energy efficient algorithm for sensor networks. In: Hu J, Leung V, Yang K, Zhang Y, Gao J, Yang S (eds) Smart grid inspired future technologies. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, Social informatics and telecommunications engineering, vol 175. Springer, Cham

  23. Sah DK, Amgoth T (2018) Parametric survey on cross-layer designs for wireless sensor networks. Comput Sci Rev 27:112–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiti F, Fantacci R, Mastandrea R, Rigazzi G, Sarmiento ÁS, López EMM (2015) A distributed clustering scheme with self nomination: proposal and application to critical monitoring. Wirel Netw 21(1):329–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Q, Nakamoto Y (2016) Topology management for reducing energy consumption and tolerating failures in wireless sensor networks. Int J Netw Comput 6(1):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Batra PK, Kant K (2018) An energy-aware clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks: GA-based approach. Int J Auton Adapt Commun Syst 11(3):275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Jiang C, Han Z, Ren Y, Hanzo L (2016) Network association strategies for an energy harvesting aided super-WiFi network relying on measured solar activity. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 34(12):3785–3797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Płaczek B, Bernas M (2017) Self-organizing mobility control in wireless sensor and actor networks based on virtual electrostatic interactions. Wirel Pers Commun 96(4):5083–5103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai L, Wang B, Yuan Y, Han S, Chih-Lin I, Wang Z (2015) Non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G: solutions, challenges, opportunities, and future research trends. IEEE Commun Mag 53(9):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 61501282), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (No. ZR2018MF003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266590, Shandong, China

    Ruiying Wang & Guoping He

  2. Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China

    Guoping He, Xiaoming Wu & Fuqiang Wang

  3. Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China

    Yifan Hu

  4. Joint China-Ukrainian Scientific and Innovation Laboratory for Hydroacoustics, Jinan, China

    Yifan Hu

Authors
  1. Ruiying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guoping He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoming Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fuqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yifan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoping He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., He, G., Wu, X. et al. Research on suboptimal energy balance of non-uniform distributed nodes in WSN. J Supercomput 76, 3527–3541 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2646-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2646-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation