Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

SLA-RALBA: cost-efficient and resource-aware load balancing algorithm for cloud computing

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, Service-level agreement (SLA) is deemed to be an integral aspect for on-demand provisioning of scalable resources on Cloud. SLA defines important constraints for instance guaranteed quality of service (QoS), pricing, fault-tolerant availability, security, and period of service. Currently, there is a dire need of SLA-based scheduling that improves resources utilization on Cloud. Scheduling with reduced execution time and cost may adversely affect resource utilization. To overcome this issue, we present a cost-efficient SLA-based load balancing scheduler, namely SLA-RALBA, for heterogeneous Cloud infrastructures. The proposed technique supports three levels of SLA opted by the Cloud users. The proposed novel technique incorporates the execution cost for the successful execution of users’ services to elevate the resource utilization on Cloud. The SLA-RALBA is simulated for performance analysis using the benchmark GoCJ and HCSP datasets. The performance results of the SLA-RALBA are compared with the existing schedulers, namely Execution-MCT, Profit-MCT, SLA-MCT, Execution-Min-Min, Profit-Min-Min, and SLA-Min-Min in terms of average resource utilization, execution time, and cost of the Cloud services. The obtained results reveal that SLA-RALBA provides an even trade-off between execution time and cost of the services by guaranteeing a drastic improvement in resource utilization on Cloud than existing algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beloglazov A, Buyya R (2013) Managing overloaded hosts for dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers under quality of service constraints. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 24(7):1366–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeo CS, Buyya R (2005) Service level agreement based allocation of cluster resources : handling penalty to enhance utility. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing

  3. Durao F, Fernando J, Carvalho S, Fonseka A (2014) A systematic review on cloud computing. J Supercomput 68(3):1321–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Groot S (2013) Research on efficient resource utilization in data intensive distributed systems. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yadwadkar NJ, Gonzalez JE, Katz R (2016) Multi-task learning for straggler avoiding predictive job scheduling. J Mach Learn Res 17:1–37

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ananthanarayanan G, Ghodsi A, Shenker S, Stoica I (2013) Effective straggler mitigation : attack of the clones. In: 10th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2013, pp 185–198

  7. Hussain A, Aleem M, Islam MA, Iqbal MA (2018) A rigorous evaluation of state-of-the-art scheduling algorithms for cloud computing. IEEE Access 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavulya S, Tany J, Gandhi R, Narasimhan P (2010) An analysis of traces from a production MapReduce cluster. In: 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing (CCGrid), 2010, pp 94–103

  9. Isard M, Birrell A, Fetterly D (2007) Dryad: distributed data-parallel programs from sequential building blocks. In: 2nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems, 2007, pp 59–72

  10. Zaharia M et al (2012) Resilient distributed datasets : a fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing. In: 9th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation

  11. Son S, Jung G, Chan S (2013) An SLA-based cloud computing that facilitates resource allocation in the distributed data centers of a cloud provider An SLA-based cloud computing that facilitates resource allocation in the distributed data centers of a cloud. J Supercomput 64(2):606–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg SK, Toosi AN, Gopalaiyengar SK, Buyya R (2014) SLA-based virtual machine management for heterogeneous workloads in a cloud datacenter. J Netw Comput Appl 45:108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain A, Aleem M, Khan A, Iqbal MA, Islam MA (2018) RALBA: a computation-aware load balancing scheduler for cloud computing. Clust Comput 21(3):1667–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2414-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hussain A, Aleem M (2018) GoCJ: Google cloud jobs dataset for distributed and cloud computing infrastructure. MDPI Data 3(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. ‘Heterogeneous computing scheduling problem (HCSP) instances’. [Online]. Available: https://www.fing.edu.uy/inco/grupos/cecal/hpc/HCSP/HCSP_inst.htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2019

  16. Braun TD et al (2001) A comparison of eleven static heuristics for mapping a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous distributed computing systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 61(6):810–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Calheiros RN, Ranjan R, Beloglazov A, De Rose CAF, Buyya R (2009) CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw Pract Exp 39(7):701–736

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leitner P, Hummer W, Satzger B, Inzinger C, Dustdar S (2012) Cost-efficient and application SLA-aware client side request scheduling in an infrastructure-as-a-service cloud. In: IEEE Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2012, pp 213–220

  19. Alrokayan M, Dastjerdi AV, Buyya R (2014) SLA-aware provisioning and scheduling of cloud resources for big data analytics. In: IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets (CCEM), 2014, pp 1–8

  20. Sharma U, Shenoy P, Sahu S, Shaikh A (2011) A cost-aware elasticity provisioning system for the cloud. In: IEEE 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2011, pp 559–570

  21. Lenzini L, Mingozzi E, Stea G (2004) Tradeoffs between low complexity, low latency, and fairness with deficit round-robin schedulers. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 12(4):681–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aditya A, Chatterjee U, Gupta S (2015) A comparative study of different static and dynamic load balancing algorithm in cloud computing with special emphasis on time factor. Int J Curr Eng Technol 5(3):2277–4106

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamid S et al (2017) Performance comparison of heuristic algorithms for task scheduling in IaaS cloud computing environment. PLoS ONE 12(5):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li B, Wu H (2015) Heuristics to allocate high-performance cloudlets for computation offloading in mobile ad hoc clouds. J Supercomput 71(8):3009–3036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muhammed A, Abdullah A, Hussin M (2016) Max-average: an extended max–min scheduling algorithm for grid computing environment. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng 8(6):43–47

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elzeki OM, Rashad MZ, Elsoud MA (2012) Overview of scheduling tasks in distributed computing systems. Int J Soft Comput Eng 2(3):470–475

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tchernykh A et al (2016) Online Bi-objective scheduling for IaaS clouds ensuring quality of service. J Grid Comput 14(1):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maheswaran M, Ali S, Siegel HJ, Hensgen D, Freund RF (1999) Dynamic mapping of a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous computing systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 59(2):107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen H, Wang F, Helian N, Akanmu G (2013) User-priority guided min-min scheduling algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing. In: 2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies, PARCOMPTECH 2013, pp 1–8

  30. Sharma G, Banga P (2013) Task aware switcher scheduling for batch mode mapping in computational grid environment. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 3:1292–1299

    Google Scholar 

  31. Panda SK, Jana PK (2017) SLA-based task scheduling algorithms for heterogeneous multi-cloud environment. J Supercomput 73(6):2730–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Al Shalabi L, Shaaban Z, Kasasbeh B (2006) Data mining: a preprocessing engine data mining. J Comput Sci 2(9):735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shao X, Wang Z, Li P, Feng CJ (2005) Integrating data mining and rough set for customer group-based discovery of product configuration rules. Int J Prod Res 44(14):2789–2811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Altaf Hussain, Muhammad Aleem, Muhammad Azhar Iqbal & Muhammad Arshad Islam

Authors
  1. Altaf Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Aleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Azhar Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Arshad Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Altaf Hussain.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, A., Aleem, M., Iqbal, M.A. et al. SLA-RALBA: cost-efficient and resource-aware load balancing algorithm for cloud computing. J Supercomput 75, 6777–6803 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02916-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02916-4

Keywords