Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting air passenger traffic flow based on the two-phase learning model

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The future airports will head toward a highly intelligent direction, like the unmanned check-in services, while the scale and resources allocation of the ground service are tightly related to the air passenger flow. Therefore, forecasting passenger flow accurately will affect the development of future airports and the optimization of service of civil airlines significantly. As a kind of time series, air passenger flow is influenced by multiple factors, particularly, the stochastic part of seasonality, trend and volatility. These will ultimately affect the accuracy of the prediction. Therefore, this paper introduces a prediction model based on a two-phase learning framework. In phase one, various predictors cope with different features of time series in parallel and the prediction results are integrated in phase two. Furthermore, this paper has compared principal error indicators with actual data and results show that the two-phase learning model performs better than current fusion models and owns stable performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SITA: Air transport industry insights: the baggage report of 2019. https://www.sita.aero/resources/type/surveys-reports/baggage-it-insights-2019 (2019). Accessed 10 Aug 2020

  2. Fildes R, Wei Y, Ismail S (2011) Evaluating the forecasting performance of econometric models of air passenger traffic flows using multiple error measures. Int J Forecast 27:902–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo J, Xie Z, Qin Y, Jia L, Wang Y (2019) Short-term abnormal passenger flow prediction based on the fusion of SVR and LSTM. IEEE Access 7:42946–42955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Box G (2013) Box and Jenkins: time series analysis, forecasting and control. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams BM, Durvasula PK, Brown DE (1998) Urban freeway traffic flow prediction: application of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average and exponential smoothing models. Transp Res Rec 1644(1):132–141. https://doi.org/10.3141/1644-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatfield C (1978) The holt-winters forecasting procedure. Appl Stat. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y (2017) The research and applications of time series forecasting methods based on machine learning. Ph.D. thesis, Lanzhou University

  8. Qin D, Yu J, Zou G, Yong R, Zhao Q, Zhang B (2019) A novel combined prediction scheme based on CNN and LSTM for urban pm2.5 concentration. IEEE Access 7:20050–20059. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.289702810.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith B, Demetsky M (1994) Short-term traffic flow prediction: neural network approach. Transp Res Rec 1453:98–104

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ke-wu Y (2009) Study on the forecast of air passenger flow based on SVM regression algorithm. In: 2009 First International Workshop on Database Technology and Applications, pp 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1109/DBTA.2009.33

  11. Laik MN, Choy M, Sen P (2014) Predicting airline passenger load: a case study. In: 2014 IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics, vol 1, pp 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2014.39

  12. Lu P, Wei F, Yang L (2019) Military escape parachute price prediction for small sample based on xgboost. In: 2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887752

  13. Dietterich TG (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Dietterich TG (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on multiple classifier systems (MCS), Cagliari, Italy, pp 1–15

  14. Nai W, Liu L, Wang S, Dong D (2017) An emd-sarima-based modeling approach for air traffic forecasting. Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.3390/a10040139

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang X, Zhang L, Chen XM (2014) Short-term forecasting of high-speed rail demand: a hybrid approach combining ensemble empirical mode decomposition and gray support vector machine with real-world applications in China. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 44:110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergmeir C, Hyndman R, Benítez J (2016) Bagging exponential smoothing methods using STL decomposition and Box–Cox transformation. Int J Forecast 32:303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieto MR, Carmona-Benítez RB (2018) Arima + garch + bootstrap forecasting method applied to the airline industry. J Air Transp Manag 71:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sulistyowati R, Suhartono, Kuswanto H, Setiawan, Astuti ET (2018) Hybrid forecasting model to predict air passenger and cargo in Indonesia. In: 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), pp 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT.2018.8350816

  19. Bi Xy, Li B, Lu Wl, Zhou Xz (2020) Daily runoff forecasting based on data-augmented neural network model. J Hydroinform 22(4):900–915. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mostafaeipour A, Goli A, Qolipour M (2018) Prediction of air travel demand using a hybrid artificial neural network (ANN) with bat and firefly algorithms: a case study. J Supercomput 74(10):5461–5484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2452-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larabi Marie-Sainte S, Saba T, Alotaibi S (2019) Air passenger demand forecasting using particle swarm optimization and firefly algorithm. J Comput Theor Nanosci 16:3735–3743. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2019.8242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu X, Huang X, Chen L, Qiu Z, Chen M (2017) Prediction of passenger flow at Sanya airport based on combined methods. In: Zou B, Li M, Wang H, Song X, Xie W, Lu Z (eds) Data science. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 729–740

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo F, Polak JW, Krishnan R (2018) Predictor fusion for short-term traffic forecasting. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 92:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao K, Li L, Cai et al S (2020) An optimized time series combined forecasting method based on neural networks. J Supercomput 7:2986–3012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03064-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hierons R (1999) Machine learning. Tom M. Mitchell. published by Mcgrawand#x2010;hill, Maidenhead, U.K., International student edition, 1997. ISBN: 0and#x2010;07and#x2010;115467and#x2010;1, 414 pp. price: U.K. andpound;22.99, soft cover. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 9(3), 191–193

  26. Diaz-Robles L, Ortega Bravo JC, Fu J, Reed G, Chow J, Watson J, Moncada J (2008) A hybrid arima and artificial neural networks model to forecast particulate matter in urban areas: the case of Temuco, Chile. Atmos Environ 42:8331–8340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elvira L (2002) Annual electrical peak load forecasting methods with measures of prediction error. Diss Abstr Int 62 Section: B

  28. Ruiz-Aguilar J, Turias I, Jiménez-Come M (2014) Hybrid approaches based on sarima and artificial neural networks for inspection time series forecasting. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 67:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chemali E, Kollmeyer P, Preindl M, Ahmed R, Emadi A (2017) Long short-term memory-networks for accurate state of charge estimation of li-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Ind Electron PP(99):1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li J, Li X, He D (2019) A directed acyclic graph network combined with CNN and LSTM for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Access 7:75464–75475. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

  32. XingFen W, Xiangbin Y, Yangchun M (2018) Research on user consumption behavior prediction based on improved xgboost algorithm. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp 4169–4175. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622235

  33. BTS: Passengers (all U.S. carriers-all airports). https://www.bts.gov/ (2019). Accessed 10 June 2019

  34. Chan PK, Stolfo SJ (1997) On the accuracy of meta-learning for scalable data mining. J Intell Inf Syst 8(1):5–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008640732416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Bureau of Transportation Statistics of the United States Department of Transportation for providing air passenger traffic flow data, and pay special thanks to Sulistyowati et al. as their work provides useful information to this paper.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1933123).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinzhi Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Xiang, Y., Mao, G. et al. Forecasting air passenger traffic flow based on the two-phase learning model. J Supercomput 77, 4221–4243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03428-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03428-2

Keywords

Navigation