Abstract
A recognition model named the SVM-NP is proposed in this paper to address the multi-attribute overlap in radar working recognition. The model is based on the K-NN boundary preselection algorithm and SVM-BP algorithm. Traditional classifiers tend to neglect the overlap of samples' attributes in classification, which leads to the low accuracy of classifiers. The K-NN boundary preselection can quickly select boundary samples from the total ones and reduce the whole samples' attribute overlap. The SVM-BP algorithm is improved based on the SVM-RFE algorithm, and the boundary samples with high attribute overlap are divided into many planes for training and testing. Compared with traditional methods, the overlap of sample attributes can be reduced twice in this model. Theoretical analysis and experimental results verify that the model proposed in this paper displays better performance in classification when appropriate parameters are provided.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Li X, Liu Z, Huang Z (2020) Attention-based radar PRI modulation recognition with recurrent neural networks. IEEE Access 8:7426–57436. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982654
Liu ZM (2020) Recognition of multi-function radars via hierarchically mining and exploiting pulse group patterns. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 99:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2020.2999163
Ke MA, Da-Ping BI, Li-Qun HU et al (2019) Air-to-air operation statuses recognition of airborne fire control radar based on ELINT. Electron Inf Warf Technol 34(4):35–39+64
Yan L, Ji X, Mei J (2010) Principle and system of airborne radar. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing, pp 20–64
Chen W, Fu K, Zuo J et al (2017) Radar emitter classification for large data set based on weighted-xgboost. IET Radar Sonar Navig 11(8):1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0632
Nguyen HPK, Do VL, Dong QT (2020) A parallel neural network-based scheme for radar emitter recognition. In: 14th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication, IMCOM 2020; Taichung; Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM48794.2020.9001727
Kvasnov AV (2020) Methodology of classification and recognition the radar emission sources based on Bayesian programming. IET Radar Sonar Navig 14(8):1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0380
Wang Y, Cheng S, Zhou Y, Guo P (2017) A parameter-optimized LSSVM method for operation modes recognition of airborne fire control radar. J Air Force Eng Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 18(03):49–53
Dong X, Cheng S, Chen Y, Lai J (2018) PSO-DPNN method for radar operation modes recognition. J Electron Meas Instrum 32(12):44–50. https://doi.org/10.13382/j.jemi.2018.12.006
Dong X, Cheng S (2018) Radar working modes recognition based on discrete process neural network. Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 394(4):042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/394/4/042088
Shuo X, Xin A (2019) ML2S-SVM: multi-label least-squares support vector machine classifiers. Electron Libr 37(06):1040–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-09-2019-0207
Boser BE (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of annual ACM workshop on computational learning theory, vol 5, pp 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401
Chen XJ, Zhang ZG, Tong Y (2014) An improved ID3 decision tree algorithm. Adv Mater Res 962–965:2842–2847. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2842
Xie T, Wang C et al (2016) hi-RF: incremental learning random forest for large-scale multi-class data classification. In: 2016 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and industrial engineering (AIIE2016), Science and Engineering Research Center: Science and Engineering Research Center, p 10. https://doi.org/10.2991/aiie-16.2016.72
Kawakami S, Numao N, Okubo Y et al (2008) Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy. Eur Urol 54(3):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.017
Calders T, Verwer S (2010) Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Min Knowl Disc 21(2):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x
Fong S, Cerone A (2012) Attribute overlap minimization and outlier elimination as dimensionality reduction techniques for text classification algorithms. J Emerg Technol Web Intell 4(3):259–263. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.4.3.259-263
Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S et al (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46:389–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012487302797
Luo P, Kang G, Xu X (2020) A novel feature selection and classification method of Alzheimer's disease based on multi-features in MRI. In: Proceedings of the 2020 10th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics (ICBBB'20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386052.3386072
Byun S, Yoon S, Jung K (2020) Comparative studies on machine learning for paralinguistic signal compression and classification. J Supercomput 76(10):8357–8371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03346-3
Tang T, Chen S, Zhao M et al (2019) Very large-scale data classification based on K-means clustering and multi-kernel SVM. Soft Comput 23(11):3793–3801
Cao H (2020) Big data attribute selection method in distributed network fault diagnosis database. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(6):7903–7914. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179859
Dua M (2020) Attribute selection and ensemble classifier based novel approach to intrusion detection system. Procedia Comput Sci 167:2191–2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.271
Devadass CSC, Karunakaran V, Velswamy R (2020) Classification of diabetes dataset using KNN classifier and attribute selection through bees algorithm. Test Eng Manag 83(3):8195–8199
Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, pp 203–216
Duan KB, Rajapakse JC, Wang H et al (2005) Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data. IEEE Trans NanoBioence 4(3):228–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2005.853657
Chen Z (2015) Modeling and analysis of new system radar operation mode and state. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.
Liu J (2016) Airborne fire control radar work modes recognition. Electron Meas Technol 39(2):131–133. https://doi.org/10.19651/j.cnki.emt.2016.02.031
Tang Y, He M, Han J, Cheng B (2019) Radar operation mode recognition based on composite weighted TOPSIS. J China Acad Electron Inf Technol 2:196–202. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2019.02.015
Skolnik MI (2010) Radar handbook, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–191
Liao Y, Chen X (2020) Working pattern recognition of airborne fire control radar for unbalanced data. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th international conference on digital signal processing (ICDSP 2020). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 19 June 2020, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408127.3408186
Acknowledgements
This paper is funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Key Laboratory of Advanced Marine Communication and Information Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China. The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, Y., Chen, X. Multi-attribute overlapping radar working pattern recognition based on K-NN and SVM-BP. J Supercomput 77, 9642–9657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03660-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03660-4