Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-attribute overlapping radar working pattern recognition based on K-NN and SVM-BP

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recognition model named the SVM-NP is proposed in this paper to address the multi-attribute overlap in radar working recognition. The model is based on the K-NN boundary preselection algorithm and SVM-BP algorithm. Traditional classifiers tend to neglect the overlap of samples' attributes in classification, which leads to the low accuracy of classifiers. The K-NN boundary preselection can quickly select boundary samples from the total ones and reduce the whole samples' attribute overlap. The SVM-BP algorithm is improved based on the SVM-RFE algorithm, and the boundary samples with high attribute overlap are divided into many planes for training and testing. Compared with traditional methods, the overlap of sample attributes can be reduced twice in this model. Theoretical analysis and experimental results verify that the model proposed in this paper displays better performance in classification when appropriate parameters are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Li X, Liu Z, Huang Z (2020) Attention-based radar PRI modulation recognition with recurrent neural networks. IEEE Access 8:7426–57436. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu ZM (2020) Recognition of multi-function radars via hierarchically mining and exploiting pulse group patterns. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 99:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2020.2999163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ke MA, Da-Ping BI, Li-Qun HU et al (2019) Air-to-air operation statuses recognition of airborne fire control radar based on ELINT. Electron Inf Warf Technol 34(4):35–39+64

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yan L, Ji X, Mei J (2010) Principle and system of airborne radar. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing, pp 20–64

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen W, Fu K, Zuo J et al (2017) Radar emitter classification for large data set based on weighted-xgboost. IET Radar Sonar Navig 11(8):1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen HPK, Do VL, Dong QT (2020) A parallel neural network-based scheme for radar emitter recognition. In: 14th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication, IMCOM 2020; Taichung; Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM48794.2020.9001727

  7. Kvasnov AV (2020) Methodology of classification and recognition the radar emission sources based on Bayesian programming. IET Radar Sonar Navig 14(8):1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Cheng S, Zhou Y, Guo P (2017) A parameter-optimized LSSVM method for operation modes recognition of airborne fire control radar. J Air Force Eng Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 18(03):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dong X, Cheng S, Chen Y, Lai J (2018) PSO-DPNN method for radar operation modes recognition. J Electron Meas Instrum 32(12):44–50. https://doi.org/10.13382/j.jemi.2018.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong X, Cheng S (2018) Radar working modes recognition based on discrete process neural network. Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 394(4):042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/394/4/042088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shuo X, Xin A (2019) ML2S-SVM: multi-label least-squares support vector machine classifiers. Electron Libr 37(06):1040–1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-09-2019-0207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boser BE (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of annual ACM workshop on computational learning theory, vol 5, pp 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen XJ, Zhang ZG, Tong Y (2014) An improved ID3 decision tree algorithm. Adv Mater Res 962–965:2842–2847. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xie T, Wang C et al (2016) hi-RF: incremental learning random forest for large-scale multi-class data classification. In: 2016 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and industrial engineering (AIIE2016), Science and Engineering Research Center: Science and Engineering Research Center, p 10. https://doi.org/10.2991/aiie-16.2016.72

  15. Kawakami S, Numao N, Okubo Y et al (2008) Development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy. Eur Urol 54(3):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calders T, Verwer S (2010) Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Min Knowl Disc 21(2):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-010-0190-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Fong S, Cerone A (2012) Attribute overlap minimization and outlier elimination as dimensionality reduction techniques for text classification algorithms. J Emerg Technol Web Intell 4(3):259–263. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.4.3.259-263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S et al (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46:389–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012487302797

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo P, Kang G, Xu X (2020) A novel feature selection and classification method of Alzheimer's disease based on multi-features in MRI. In: Proceedings of the 2020 10th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics (ICBBB'20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386052.3386072

  20. Byun S, Yoon S, Jung K (2020) Comparative studies on machine learning for paralinguistic signal compression and classification. J Supercomput 76(10):8357–8371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03346-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang T, Chen S, Zhao M et al (2019) Very large-scale data classification based on K-means clustering and multi-kernel SVM. Soft Comput 23(11):3793–3801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao H (2020) Big data attribute selection method in distributed network fault diagnosis database. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(6):7903–7914. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dua M (2020) Attribute selection and ensemble classifier based novel approach to intrusion detection system. Procedia Comput Sci 167:2191–2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Devadass CSC, Karunakaran V, Velswamy R (2020) Classification of diabetes dataset using KNN classifier and attribute selection through bees algorithm. Test Eng Manag 83(3):8195–8199

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, pp 203–216

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Duan KB, Rajapakse JC, Wang H et al (2005) Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data. IEEE Trans NanoBioence 4(3):228–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2005.853657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Z (2015) Modeling and analysis of new system radar operation mode and state. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.

  28. Liu J (2016) Airborne fire control radar work modes recognition. Electron Meas Technol 39(2):131–133. https://doi.org/10.19651/j.cnki.emt.2016.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Y, He M, Han J, Cheng B (2019) Radar operation mode recognition based on composite weighted TOPSIS. J China Acad Electron Inf Technol 2:196–202. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2019.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Skolnik MI (2010) Radar handbook, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–191

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liao Y, Chen X (2020) Working pattern recognition of airborne fire control radar for unbalanced data. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th international conference on digital signal processing (ICDSP 2020). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 19 June 2020, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408127.3408186

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Key Laboratory of Advanced Marine Communication and Information Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China. The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, Y., Chen, X. Multi-attribute overlapping radar working pattern recognition based on K-NN and SVM-BP. J Supercomput 77, 9642–9657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03660-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03660-4

Keywords