Skip to main content
Log in

Stealth assessment strategy in distributed systems using optimal deep learning with game based learning

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Game-based learning (GBL) is familiar in several respects, as it can embed problem-solving challenges in an interactive virtual environment to improve students’ motivation. Designing a stealth assessment is a tedious task that requires experienced professionals to manually derive evidence and competency approaches to precisely deduce student knowledge and skills. This necessitates that stealth assessment designers perform manual feature engineering and develop probabilistic graphical models. Since the manual feature engineering process is complex, this paper develops Optimal Deep Learning with GBL (ODL-GBL) for stealth assessment. The proposed ODL-GBL model involves parameter-tuned bi-directional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) with an oppositional salp swarm algorithm. The optimal Bi-LSTM model extracts hierarchical features from low-level data in an automated way (e.g., a series of student behaviours in a GBL platform) to infer evidence for competencies. The proposed ODL-GBL model alleviates the need for the costlier and more tedious process of developing evidence models. A detailed experimental analysis is used to validate the effective predictive performance of the proposed method. Among all the compared methods, the Bi-LSTM model shows superior performance, with accuracies of 60.56% and 61.34% under 70 and 40 hidden units, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akram B, Min W, Wiebe E, Mott B, Boyer KE, Lester J (2018) Improving stealth assessment in game-based learning with LSTM-based analytics. In: International Conference on Educational Data Mining

  2. Geden M, Emerson A, Carpenter D, Rowe J, Azevedo R, Lester J (2020) Predictive student modeling in game-based learning environments with word embedding representations of reflection. Int J Artif Intell Edu 31:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang GJ, Sung HY, Hung CM, Huang I, Tsai CC (2012) Development of a personalized educational computer game based on students’ learning styles. Edu Technol Res Dev 60(4):623e638

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hung PH, Hwang GJ, Lee YH, Su I (2012) A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools. Comput Edu 59(2):762e773

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ardito C, Lanzilotti R, Costabile MF, Desolda G (2013) Integrating traditional learning and games on large displays: an experimental study. Edu Technol Soc 16(1):4456

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CY, Chen MP (2009) A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Comput Edu 52(3):530e542

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiili K (2007) Foundation for problem-based gaming. Br J Edu Technol 38(3):394e404

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shute V (2011) Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games Instruction 55(2):503–524

    Google Scholar 

  9. Corbett AT, Anderson JR (1994) Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model User-Adapt Interact 4(4):253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yudelson MV, Koedinger KR, Gordon GJ (2013) Individualized Bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Proc Artif Intell Educ. pp. 171–180

  11. Lee JI, Brunskill E (2012) The impact on individualizing student models on necessary practice opportunities. In: Proc Educ Data Mining. pp. 118–125

  12. Mislevy RJ, Behrens JT, Dicerbo KE, Levy R (2012) Design and discovery in educational assessment: evidence-centered design, psychometrics, and educational data mining. J Educ Data Mining 4(1):11–48

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YJ, Almond RG, Shute VJ (2016) Applying evidence-centered design for the development of game-based assessments in physics playground. Int J Testing 16(2):142–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Falakmasir MH, Gonzalez-Brenes JP, Gordon GJ, DiCerbo KE (2016) A data-driven approach for inferring student proficiency from game activity logs. In: Proc Learn Scale Conf. pp. 341–349

  15. Hephzi P, Dhanasekaran S, Duraipandy P, Laxmi Lydia E, Sivaram M, Shankar K (2020) Optimal dense convolutional network model for image classification in unmanned aerial vehicles based Adhoc networks. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput (In Press)

  16. Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barisal AK, Prusty RC (2015) Large scale economic dispatch of power systems using oppositional invasive weed optimization. Appl Soft Comput 29:122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Min W, Frankosky M, Mott BW, Rowe J, Smith PAM, Wiebe E, Boyer K, Lester J (2019) DeepStealth: game-based learning stealth assessment with deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 13:312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh S, Sharma PK, Moon SY et al (2019) A comprehensive study on APT attacks and countermeasures for future networks and communications: challenges and solutions. J Supercomput 75:4543–4574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1850-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yazdanian P, Sharifian S (2021) E2LG: a multiscale ensemble of LSTM/GAN deep learning architecture for multistep-ahead cloud workload prediction. J Supercomput 77:11052–11082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03723-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Asghari A, Sohrabi MK, Yaghmaee F (2021) Task scheduling, resource provisioning, and load balancing on scientific workflows using parallel SARSA reinforcement learning agents and genetic algorithm. J Supercomput 77:2800–2828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03364-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin C, Zhu Y, Liu S et al (2020) Enhancing network intrusion detection classifiers using supervised adversarial training. J Supercomput 76:6690–6719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03092-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shute VJ, Rahimi S (2021) Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game. Comput Human Behav 116:106647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henderson N, Kumaran V, Min W, Mott B, Wu Z, Boulden D, Lord T, Reichsman F, Dorsey C, Wiebe E, Lester J (2020) Enhancing student competency models for game-based learning with a hybrid stealth assessment framework. In: International Educational Data Mining Society

  25. Shute V, Rahimi S, Smith G, Ke F, Almond R, Dai CP, Kuba R, Liu Z, Yang X, Sun C (2021) Maximizing learning without sacrificing the fun: Stealth assessment, adaptivity and learning supports in educational games. J Comput Assist Learn 37(1):127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Prasanna.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajendran, D., Prasanna, S. Stealth assessment strategy in distributed systems using optimal deep learning with game based learning. J Supercomput 78, 8285–8301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04236-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04236-y

Keywords

Navigation