Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A reliable concurrent multicast algorithm for content distribution

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid growth in the number of users, devices and applications and infrastructures generating and demanding massive amount of content traffic on the Internet has necessitated the available network infrastructures to evolve to cope up with the ever increasing content traffic. One of the approaches in reducing the content traffic and increasing the network throughput is the paradigm of multicast. Multicast is a one-to-many wave scheme for content distribution from a source to all or a large number of destinations. In this paper, we propose the first novel reliable concurrent content multicast algorithm, referred to as a CD-wave algorithm, for concurrent distribution of content from some or all peers to all other network peers. The proposed algorithm synchronises concurrent multicasts in sharing network resources while providing the desirable properties of self- and snap-stabilization. Concurrent mulicasts from different sources are synchronized so that multiple multicasts use each network channel mutually exclusively while ensuring that each multicast eventually succeeds to deliver its content to all system peers. Due to being reliable, each multicast content is guaranteed to be received by all system peers exactly once regardless of the arbitrary initial system configuration in the presence of potentially \(n-1\) other multicasts competing for network resources where n denotes the number of peers in the network. The snap-stabilization property of our proposed algorithm facilitates the reliability property by ensuring that content distribution proceeds as per its specification to reach all system peers without backtracking after starting in an arbitrary initial configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiménez-Soria D, Martín-Vega FJ, Aguayo-Torres MC (2021) Coordinated multicast/unicast transmission on 5g: a novel approach for linear broadcasting. Wirel Pers Commun 121:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jun D, Song J, Ren Y, Wang J (2021) Convergence of broadband and broadcast/multicast in maritime information networks. Tsinghua Sci Technol 26(5):592–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn SK, Jung H, Kwon S, Hur N, Choi DJ, Park SI (2021) Trends of terrestrial broadcasting technology based on MBMS. Electron Telecommun Trends 36(4):72–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Samuylov A, Moltchanov D, Kovalchukov R, Pirmagomedov R, Gaidamaka Y, Andreev S, Koucheryavy Y, Samouylov K (2020) Characterizing resource allocation trade-offs in 5g nr serving multicast and unicast traffic. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 19(5):3421–3434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen C, Liu C, Rouil RA., Choi HA (2020) Study of multicast broadcast single frequency network area in multicast communications. In: 2020 14th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), pp 1–8

  6. Debnath SK, Saha M, Islam Md, Sarker PK, Pramanik I et al (2021) Evaluation of multicast and unicast routing protocols performance for group communication with QOS constraints in 802.11 mobile ad-hoc networks. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 13(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khabazian M, Aissa S, Mehmet-Ali M (2013) Performance modeling of safety messages broadcast in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14(380–387):03

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stephen Craig R (1986) The American forces network, Europe: a case study in military broadcasting. J Broadcast Electron Media 30(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies B (1994) Safety critical problems in medical systems. In: Redmill F, Anderson T (eds) Technology and assessment of safety-critical systems. Springer, London, pp 55–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong C-Y, Mandal S, Al-Fares M, Zhu M, Alimi R, Kondapa Naidu B, Bhagat C, Jain S, Kaimal J, Liang S, Mendelev K, Padgett S, Rabe F, Ray S, Tewari M, Tierney M, Zahn M, Zolla J, Ong J, Vahdat A (2018) B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google’s software-defined wan. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM ’18, pp 74–87, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  11. Sun G, Liao D, Zhao D, Xu Z, Yu H (2018) Live migration for multiple correlated virtual machines in cloud-based data centers. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 11(2):279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mseddi A, Salahuddin M, Zhani M F, Elbiaze H, Glitho R (2018) Efficient replica migration scheme for distributed cloud storage systems. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput, Pp 1–1, 07

  13. Sun G, Chen Z, Hongfang Y, Du X, Guizani M (2019) Online parallelized service function chain orchestration in data center networks. IEEE Access, Pp 1–1, 07

  14. Jonathan A, Chandra A, Weissman J (2018) Multi-query optimization in wide-area streaming analytics. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SoCC ’18, pp 412–425, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  15. Noormohammadpour M, Raghavendra CS (2018) Datacenter traffic control: understanding techniques and tradeoffs. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 20(2):1492–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun G, Xu Z, Yu H, Chang V, Du X, Guizani M (2019) Toward SLAs guaranteed scalable vdc provisioning in cloud data centers. IEEE Access 7:80219–80232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasimoto-Beltran R, Lopez-Fuentes F, Vera-Lopez M (2018) Hierarchical p2p architecture for efficient content distribution. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl, 08

  18. Peterson N, Anusuya-Rangappa L, Shirazi B, Song W, Huang R, Tran D, Chien S, Lahusen R (2010) Volcano monitoring: a case study in pervasive computing, pp 201–230. 01

  19. Brown S, Johnson O, Tassi A (2018) Reliability of broadcast communications under sparse random linear network coding. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 67(5):4677–4682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Striccoli D, Piro G, Boggia G (2019) Multicast and broadcast services over mobile networks: a survey on standardized approaches and scientific outcomes. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(2):1020–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mcgrath S, Daria P, Whitebread CK (2000) Intelligent mobile agents in the military domain. In: Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents 2000 Workshop on Agents in Industry

  22. Adamson B, Macker JP (Oct 2010) Reliable messaging for tactical group communication. In 2010 - Milcom 2010 Military Communications Conference, pp 1899–1904

  23. Raynal M (2018) Reliable broadcast in the presence of byzantine processes. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bonomi S, Farina G, Tixeuil S (2018) Reliable broadcast in dynamic networks with locally bounded byzantine failures. In: Izumi T, Kuznetsov P (eds) Stabilization, safety, and security of distributed systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 170–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Rand TW, Eby MS (Oct 2004) Algorithms for airborne conflict detection, prevention, and resolution. In: The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576), vol 1, pp 521–31

  26. Sharma K, Kumawat J, Maheshwari S, Jain N (2014) Railway security system based on wireless sensor networks: state of the art

  27. Schiff L, Tsafrir Z, Aoun J, Taylor A, Theoharis E, Eisenstein D (2016) Quality of communication in robotic surgery and surgical outcomes. J SocLaparoendoscopic Surg 20(e2016):00026

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang R, Wu J, Long C, Zhu Y, Lin Y (June 2017) Mitigate the obstructing effect of vehicles on the propagation of vanets safety-related information. In: 2017 IEEE Intell Veh Symp (IV), pp 1893–1898

  29. Vni complete forecast highlights. Accessed: 2016

  30. What netflix’s 1 billion video hours streamed means for bandwidth

  31. Wendell P, Freedman MJ (2011) Going viral: flash crowds in an open CDN. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC ’11, pp 549-558, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  32. Nygren E, Sitaraman RK, Sun J (2010) The Akamai network: a platform for high-performance internet applications. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 44(3):2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao M, Aditya P, Chen A, Lin Y, Haeberlen A, Druschel P, Maggs B, Wishon B, Ponec M (2013) Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai Netsession. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC ’13, pp 31–42, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  34. Smite D, Moe NB, Levinta G, Floryan M (2019) Spotify guilds: How to succeed with knowledge sharing in large-scale agile organizations. IEEE Softw 36(2):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yin H, Liu X, Zhan T, Sekar V, Qiu F, Lin C, Zhang H, Li B (2010) Livesky: Enhancing CDN with p2p. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 6(3)

  36. Li H (2012) The platform of spoof videos: the case of tudou.com. Cultural Sci J 5:07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang G, Liu W, Hei X, Cheng W (2015) Unreeling Xunlei Kankan: understanding hybrid CDN-p2p video-on-demand streaming. IEEE Trans Multimed 17(2):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frank B, Poese I, Lin Y, Smaragdakis G, Feldmann A, Maggs B, Rake J, Uhlig S, Weber R (2013) Pushing CDN-ISP collaboration to the limit. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 43(3):34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Buyya R, Pathan A-MK, Broberg J, Tari Z (2006) A case for peering of content delivery networks. IEEE Distrib Syst Online 7(10):3–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gao G, Wen Y, Zhang W, Hu H (2015) Cost-efficient and QOS-aware content management in media cloud: implementation and evaluation. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp 6880–6886. IEEE

  41. Jin Y, Wen Y, Guan K (2016) Toward cost-efficient content placement in media cloud: modeling and analysis. IEEE Trans Multimed 18(5):807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Applegate D, Archer A, Gopalakrishnan V, Lee S, Ramakrishnan K K (2010) Optimal content placement for a large-scale vod system. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pp 1–12

  43. Noormohammadpour M, Raghavendra C, Rao S, Kandula S(2017) Dccast: efficient point to multipoint transfers across datacenters. 07

  44. Ji S., Liu S, Li B (2018) Deadline-aware scheduling and routing for inter-datacenter multicast transfers. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E), pp 124–133

  45. Stutzbach D, Rejaie R (2006) Understanding churn in peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp 189–202

  46. Cong X, Shuang K, Sen S, Yang FC (2014) An efficient server bandwidth costs decreased mechanism towards mobile devices in cloud-assisted p2p-VoD system. Peer-to-Peer Network Appl 7(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pathan A-MK, Buyya R (2007) A taxonomy and survey of content delivery networks. Grid Computing and Distributed Systems Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Technical Report 4:70

  48. Karamshuk D, Sastry N, Secker A, Chandaria J (2015) Isp-friendly peer-assisted on-demand streaming of long duration content in BBC iPlayer. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp 289–297. IEEE

  49. Rückert J, Knierim T, Hausheer D (2014) Clubbing with the peers: a measurement study of bittorrent live. In: 14-th IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, pp 1–10. IEEE

  50. Venkataraman V, Yoshida K, Francis P (2006) Chunkyspread: heterogeneous unstructured tree-based peer-to-peer multicast. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP ’06, pp 2–11, USA, IEEE Computer Society

  51. Ha TT, Kim J, Nam J (2017) Design and deployment of low-delay hybrid CDN—P2P architecture for live video streaming over the web. Wirel Pers Commun 94(3):513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Roverso R, Naiem A, Reda M, El-Beltagy M, El-Ansary S, Franzen N, Haridi S (2011) On the feasibility of centrally-coordinated peer-to-peer live streaming. In: 2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp 1061–1065. IEEE

  53. Zhao M, Aditya P, Chen A, Lin Y, Haeberlen A, Druschel P, Maggs B, Wishon B, Ponec M (2013) Peer-assisted content distribution in akamai netsession. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference, pp 31–42

  54. Hou D (2010) Design of streaming media information services architecture based on integrated CDN and P2P. In 2010 The 2nd Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, vol 1, pp 308–311

  55. Hardwick J, Enfield UK (2004) IP multicast explained. Data Connection Limited

  56. Sampaio A, Sousa P (2018) An adaptable and ISP-friendly multicast overlay network. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 09

  57. Gong H, Fu L, Fu X, Zhao L, Wang K, Wang X (2017) Distributed multicast tree construction in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 63(1):280–296

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Shi S, Turner J, Waldvogel M (2001) Dimensioning server access bandwidth and multicast routing in overlay networks. 07

  59. Ke K-W, Huang C-H (2013) Performance evaluation of multisource application layer multicast (ALM): theoretical and simulative aspects. Comput Netw 57(1408–1424):04

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xue Q, Ganz A (2003) Ad hoc QOS on-demand routing (AQOR) in mobile ad hoc networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 63(2):154–165

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhao X, Guo J, Chou CT, Misra A, Jha S (2011) A high-throughput routing metric for reliable multicast in multi-rate wireless mesh networks. In 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp 2042–2050. IEEE

  62. Liu Y, Niu D, Li B (2016) Delay-optimized video traffic routing in software-defined interdatacenter networks. IEEE Trans Multimedia 18(5):865–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mahdian M, Prakash N, Médard M, Yeh E (2018) Updating content in cache-aided coded multicast. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 36(6):1203–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zeebaree SRM, Rajab H (2019) Design and implement a proposed multi-sources to multi-destinations broadcasting video-signals. In 2019 4th Scientific International Conference Najaf (SICN), pp 103–108

  65. Kamimura K, Hasegawa T, Hoshino H, Ano S, Hasegawa T (2005) A practical multicast transmission control method for multi-channel HDTV IP broadcasting system. In: Y-S Ho , H-J Kim (eds) Advances in multimedia information processing - PCM 2005, pp 429–440, Springer, Berlin

  66. Rhee I, Balaguru N, Rouskas GN (1999) Mtcp: scalable tcp-like congestion control for reliable multicast. In: IEEE INFOCOM ’99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320), vol 3, pp 1265–1273

  67. Rizzo L (2000) Pgmcc: A TCP-friendly single-rate multicast congestion control scheme. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, SIGCOMM ’00, pp 17–28, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  68. Hasimoto-Beltrán R, de Asís López-Fuentes F, Vera-Lopez M (2019) Hierarchical P2P architecture for efficient content distribution. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 12:724–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Telco cdn (2002) Chapter 1: Peer-to-Peer streaming systems. In: Li Q, Shih TK (eds) Ubiquitous Multimedia Computing. CRC Press

  70. Matsumoto J (2016) Multicast tree construction algorithm for stabilization of power quality in smart grid. In 2016 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp 122–127

  71. Chen Y, Wu EH, Chen G (2017) Bandwidth-satisfied multicast by multiple trees and network coding in lossy manets. IEEE Syst J 11(2):1116–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Magnetto A, Gaeta R, Grangetto M, Sereno M (2010) Turinstream: a totally push, robust, and efficient p2p video streaming architecture. IEEE Trans Multimedia 12(8):901–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Banerjee S, Bhattacharjee B, Kommareddy C (2002) Scalable application layer multicast. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, SIGCOMM ’02, pp 205-217, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery

  74. Dijkstra EW (1973) Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. In EWD 391, In: Selected writings on computing: a personal perspective, pp 41–46

  75. Dijkstra EW (1974) Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. Commun ACM 17(11):643–644

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Blin L, Tixeuil S (2017) Compact deterministic self-stabilizing leader election on a ring: the exponential advantage of being talkative. Distrib Comput 31(2):139–166

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Delaët S, Dolev S, Peres O (2009) Safer than safe: On the initial state of self-stabilizing systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems, pp 775—776

  78. Katz S, Perry KJ (1990) Self-stabilizing extensions for massage-passing systems. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Systems

  79. Beauquier J, Delaët S, Haddad S (2006) A 1-strong self-stabilizing transformer. In: Datta AK, Gradinariu M (eds) Stabilization, safety, and security of distributed systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  80. Ghosh S, Gupta A, Herman T, Pemmaraju SV (2007) Fault-containing self-stabilizing distributed protocols. Distrib Comput 20(1):53–73

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Turau V (2017) Computing the fault-containment time of self-stabilizing algorithms using Markov chains and lumping. pp 62–77, 10

  82. Ghosh S, Gupta A (1996) An exercise in fault-containment: Self-stabilizing leader election. Inf Process Lett 59:281–288

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Ghosh S, Gupta A, Herman T, Pemmaraju SV (1996) Fault-containing self-stabilizing algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing - PODC 96

  84. Köhler S, Turau V (2010) Fault-containing self-stabilization in asynchronous systems with constant fault-gap. In: 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems

  85. Ghosh S, Gupta A, Pemmaraju SV (1996) A fault-containing self-stabilizing algorithm for spanning trees. J Comput Inf 2:322–338

    Google Scholar 

  86. Azar Y, Kutten S, Patt-Shamir B (2010) Distributed error confinement. ACM Trans Algorithms 6(3):1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. Kutten S, Patt-Shamir B (1997) Time-adaptive self stabilization. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’97, pp 149–158, New York, NY, USA, ACM

  88. Afek Y, Dolev S (1997) Local stabilizer. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing - PODC 97

  89. Dolev S, Herman T (1997) Superstabilizing protocols for dynamic distributed systems. The Chicago J Theor Comput Sci, 3(4)

  90. Delaet S, Tixeuil S (2002) Tolerating transient and intermittent failures. J Parallel Distrib Comput 62(5):961–981

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Delaët S, Dolev S, Peres O (2009) Safe and eventually safe: comparing self-stabilizing and non-stabilizing algorithms on a common ground. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Principles of Distributed Systems, pp 315—329

  92. Ghosh S, Bejan A (2003) A framework of safe stabilization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Self-Stabilizing Systems, pp 129—140

  93. Cournier A, Datta Ak, Petit F, Villain V (2002) Snap-stabilizing PIF algorithm in arbitrary networks. In: Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems

  94. Cournier A, Devismes S, Villain V (2009) Light enabling snap-stabilization of fundamental protocols. ACM Trans Autonom Adapt Syst 4(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Leve F, Mohamed K, Villain V (2016) Snap-stabilizing PIF on arbitrary connected networks in message passing model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems, pp 281—297

  96. Leve F, Mohamed K, Villain V (2014) Snap-stabilizing PIF on non-oriented trees and message passing model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems, pp 299—313

  97. Cournier A, Devismes S, Villain V (2006) From self- to snap- stabilization, vol 4280, pp 199–213, 11

  98. Cournier A, Datta AK, Devismes S, Petit F, Villain V (2016) The expressive power of snap-stabilization. Theoret Comput Sci 626:40–66

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. Blin L, Cournier A, Villain V (2003) An improved snap-stabilizing PIF algorithm. Lecture notes in computer science self-stabilizing systems, pp 199—214

  100. Godard E (2018) Snap-stabilizing tasks in anonymous networks. Theory Comput Syst 63(2):326–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Gouda MG, Haddix F (1999) The alternator. In: Proceedings 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp 48–53

  102. Mizuno M, Nesterenko M (1998) A transformation of self-stabilizing serial model programs for asynchronous parallel computing environments. Inf Process Lett 66(6):285–290

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. Viger F., Latapy M. (2005) Efficient and simple generation of random simple connected graphs with prescribed degree sequence. In: International Computing and Combinatorics Conference, pp 440–449, Springer

  104. Awerbuch B, Patt-Shamir B, Varghese G (1994) Bounding the unbounded [distributed computing protocols]. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM’94 Conference on Computer Communications, pp 776–783. IEEE

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the anonymous referees for their suggestions and constructive comments on an earlier version of the paper. Their suggestions have greatly enhanced the readability of the paper. I would like to thank Ali Hamdan for his assistance on the simulation work. This work is supported by Kuwait University Research Administration, Grant No [EO-01/17]

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, 13060, Safat, Kuwait

    Mehmet Hakan Karaata & Aysha Dabees

  2. Department of Computer Science, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, 13060, Safat, Kuwait

    Fawaz Alazemi

Authors
  1. Mehmet Hakan Karaata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aysha Dabees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fawaz Alazemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Hakan Karaata.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karaata, M.H., Dabees, A. & Alazemi, F. A reliable concurrent multicast algorithm for content distribution. J Supercomput 78, 10542–10574 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04291-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04291-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation