Skip to main content
Log in

High-performance visual geometric group deep learning architectures for MRI brain tumor classification

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is one of the most common imaging technologies used for brain cancer detection. Manual classification leads to more biopsies to ensure that there are no missed diagnoses. Recently, convolutional neural networks have achieved high accuracy in many image classification challenges. This study analyzes four different architectures from the Visual Geometric Group (VGG) for brain image classification using transfer learning. First, the feature space is generated using several 3 × 3 convolution filters and then reduced by the pooling layers in a block. These operations are repeated with different numbers of convolution filters in the subsequent blocks. After a predefined number of blocks, a fully connected layer is employed with an activation function to classify the given input. Four VGG architectures with different numbers of layers, 11, 13, 16 and 19, are developed to classify MRI images. The results prove that transfer learning on VGG architectures has good potential for brain cancer classification for REpository of Molecular BRAin Neoplasia DaTa (REMBRANDT) database MRI images. The results show that VGG-16 has the best performance, with an accuracy of 96% for brain cancer classification, followed by the VGG-19 architecture with 94.5% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Robles P, Fiest KM, Frolkis AD, Pringsheim T, Atta C et al (2015) The worldwide incidence and prevalence of primary brain tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol 17(6):776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayalapogu RR, Pabboju S, Ramisetty RR (2018) Analysis of dual-tree M-band wavelet transform based features for brain image classification. Magn Reson Med 80(6):2393–2401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohankumar S (2016) Analysis of different wavelets for brain image classification using support vector machine. Int J Adv Sig Image Sci 2(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zaw HT, Maneerat N, Win KY (2019) Brain tumor detection based on Naïve Bayes Classification. 5th International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology, p 1–4

  5. Rajini NH, Bhavani R (2011) Classification of MRI brain images using k-nearest neighbor and artificial neural network. International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology, p 563–568

  6. Saba SS, Sreelakshmi D, Kumar PS, Kumar KS, Saba SR (2020) Logistic regression machine learning algorithm on MRI brain image for fast and accurate diagnosis. Int J Sci Technol Res 9(3):7076–7081

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mohsen H, El-Dahshan ESA, El-Horbaty ESM, Salem ABM (2018) Classification using deep learning neural networks for brain tumors. Fut Comput Inform J 3(1):68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muthu Krishnammal P, Raju P (2019) Deep learning based image classification and abnormalities analysis of MRI brain images. TEQIP III Sponsored IEEE International Conference on Microwave Integrated Circuits, Photonics and Wireless Networks, p 427–431

  9. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) “Image net classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25:1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan MA, Ashraf I, Alhaisoni M, Damaševičius R, Scherer R et al (2020) Multimodal brain tumor classification using deep learning and robust feature selection: a machine learning application for radiologists. Diagnostics 10(8):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, p 1–14

  12. Khan HA, Jue W, Mushtaq M, Mushtaq MU (2020) Brain tumor classification in MRI image using convolutional neural network. Math Biosci Eng 17(5):6203–6216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p 770–778

  14. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p 2818–2826

  15. Basheera S, Ram MSS (2019) Classification of brain tumors using deep features extracted using CNN. J Phys Conf Ser IOP Publ 1172(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murugan S, Mohan KS, Ganesh Babu TR (2020) Convolutional neural network-based MRI brain tumor classification system. Int J MC Square Sci Res 12(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, et al. (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p 1–9

  18. Rai HM, Chatterjee K (2021) 2D MRI image analysis and brain tumor detection using deep learning CNN model LeU-Net. Multimed Tools Appl 80:36111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu X, Shen Z, Xue J, Fan Y, Ni T (2021) Brain tumor MR image classification using convolutional dictionary learning with local constraint. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.679847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rumala DJ et al. (2021) Bilinear MobileNets for multi-class brain disease classification based on magnetic resonance images,” IEEE Region 10 Symposium, p 1–6

  21. Fasihi MS, Mikhael WB (2021) Brain tumor grade classification using LSTM neural networks with domain pre-transforms.IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, p 529–532

  22. Liu JE, An FP (2020) Image classification algorithm based on deep learning-kernel function. Sci Program. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7607612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen D, Wu G, Suk HI (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ismail MA, Hameed N, Clos J (2021) Deep learning-based algorithm for skin cancer classification. International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, p 709–719

  25. Falconí LG, Pérez M, Aguilar WG, Conci A (2020) Transfer learning and fine tuning in breast mammogram abnormalities classification on CBIS-DDSM database. Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst 5(2):154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Diaz-Pinto A, Morales S, Naranjo V, Köhler T, Mossi JM et al (2019) CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation. Biomed Eng Online 18(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J et al (2013) The cancer imaging archive (tcia): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 26(6):1045–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Madhavan S, Zenklusen JC, Kotliarov Y, Sahni H, Fine HA et al (2009) Rembrandt: helping personalized medicine become a reality through integrative translational research. Mol Cancer Res 7(2):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. REMBRANDT:https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/REMBRANDT.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Veni.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veni, N., Manjula, J. High-performance visual geometric group deep learning architectures for MRI brain tumor classification. J Supercomput 78, 12753–12764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04384-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04384-9

Keywords

Navigation