Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

To solve the problems of combat mission predictions based on multi-instance genetic fuzzy systems

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the enemy’s combat missions in combat deductions is helpful to improve the quality of command decision. Intelligent combat mission prediction method is a technical means to adapt to the fast-paced complex modern war, and is an important part of intelligent command decision technology. In this paper, based on the solution of the problems of combat mission prediction, it is modeled as a multi-instance learning (MIL) problem according to the characteristics of the problem. To effectively integrate expert knowledge and combat deduction data, a MIL model called multi-instance genetic fuzzy system (MIGFS) is designed and implemented based on the genetic fuzzy systems (GFSs). The model is composed of multiple genetic sub-fuzzy systems (sub-FSs). By means of multi-tasking genetic fuzzy systems (MTGFSs) algorithm, multiple sub-FSs have been trained separately to solve the problem of excessive time consuming and high cost because of synchronously training too many sub-FSs. Furthermore, to complete the integration of instance prediction to bag prediction, the weighted average is used instead of the traditional max function, and the mutation problem of taking the max function is solved by learning the weight parameters of the sub-FSs. A more continuous and smooth result integration method is implemented, and the prediction accuracy is improved. Finally, a demonstrative experimental case of wargaming has been taken to illustrate that MIGFS can successfully apply MIL to combat deductions with a small amount of data, and effectively solve the problems of combat mission prediction, which demonstrates the feasibility and practicability of the proposed MIGFS model. This method can well model the problems of combat mission prediction into MIL problems, and solve the problems well, which is a good start.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Yao Q-K, Liu S-J, He X-Y, Ou W (2017) Research on air mission recognition method based on deep learning. J Syst Simul 29(9):2227–2231

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang L, Liu F-X, Zhu F, Guo D (2018) Hierarchical recognition method of hostile air-targets in sea battlefields based on Bayesian deduction. Fire Control Command Control 43(7):86–93

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L, Li S-Z (2018) Tatical intention recognition of aerial target based on XGBoost decision tree. J Meas Sci Instrum 9(2):148–152

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou W-W, Yao P-Y, Zhang J-Y, Wang X, Wei S (2018) Combat intention recognition for aerial targets based on deep neural network. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 39(11):322468–322476

    Google Scholar 

  5. He Y, Chang L-L, Jiang J, Tan Y-J (2017) Intension identification in air defense based on belief rule base expert system under expert guidance. Fire Control Command Control 42(9):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao F-J, Zhou Z-J, Hu C-H, Wang L, Liu T-Y (2017) Aerial target intention recognition approach based on belief-rule-base and evidential reasoning. Electron Opt Control 24(8):15–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao Y, Liu B, Hao Z-F, Cao L-B (2017) A similarity-based classification framework for multiple-instance learning. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(4):500–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X-G, Yan Y-L, Tang -P, Liu X (2018) Revisiting multiple instance neural networks. Pattern Recognit 74(C):15–24

  9. Zhou Z-H, Zhang M-L (2002) Neural networks for multi-instance learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Technology, pp 455–459

  10. Cheplygina V, Taxa DM, Loog M (2015) Multiple instance learning with bag dissimilarities. Pattern Recognit 48(1):264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordón O, Gomide F, Herrera F, Hoffmann F, Magdalena L (2004) Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: current framework and new trends. Fuzzy Sets Syst 141(1):5–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahajan S, Mittal N, Pandit AK (2021) Image segmentation using multilevel thresholding based on type II fuzzy entropy and marine predators algorithm. Multim Tools Appl 80:19335–19359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokeddem SA (2018) A fuzzy classification model for myocardial infarction risk assessment. Appl Intell 48(5):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eckert JJ, Santiciolli FM, Yamashita RY, Corrêa FC, Silva LCA, Dedini FG (2019) Fuzzy gear shifting control optimisation to improve vehicle performance, fuel consumption and engine emissions. IET Control Theory Appl 13(16):2658–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang A, Liu L, Qiu J, Feng G (2019) Event-triggered robust adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(8):1648–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuo H, Zhang G, Pedrycz W, Behbood V, Lu J (2017) Fuzzy regression transfer learning in Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(6):1795–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silvana M, Akbar R, Derisma D, Audina M, Firdaus (2018) Development of classification features of mental disorder characteristics using the fuzzy logic Mamdani method. In: 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, pp 410–414

  18. Mahajan S, Pandit AK (2021) Hybrid method to supervise feature selection using signal processing and complex algebra techniques. Multim Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11474-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu D, Lin CT, Huang J, Zeng Z (2020) On the functional equivalence of TSK fuzzy systems to neural networks, mixture of experts, CART, and stacking ensemble regression. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(10):2570–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang SSL, Zadeh LA (1972) On fuzzy mapping and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2(1):30–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Herrera F (2008) Genetic fuzzy systems: taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evol Intell 1(1):27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Z-L, Xiong F-L, Teng M-G (2003) Research on the weighted fuzzy rule system. Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 16(4):506–510

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang K, Hao W-N, Yu X-H, Jin D-W, Zhang Z-H (2020) A multitasking genetic algorithm for Mamdani fuzzy system with fully overlapping triangle membership functions. Int J Fuzzy Syst 22(8):2449–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta A, Ong Y, Feng L (2016) Multifactorial evolution: toward evolutionary multitasking. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(3):343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61806221).

Funding

The work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61806221.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin-Yu Song or Xiao-Han Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Q., Song, JY., Yu, XH. et al. To solve the problems of combat mission predictions based on multi-instance genetic fuzzy systems. J Supercomput 78, 14626–14647 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04388-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04388-5

Keywords

Navigation