Skip to main content
Log in

Noise-insensitive image representation via multiple extended LDB and class supervised intelligent coordination feature selection

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image description plays a dominant role in the computer vision and pattern recognition fields and has achieved a remarkable success for noise free or low-noise image. However, the methods face a great challenge when suffering from noise. Feature extraction is divided into floating point and binary. However floating point feature descriptors are complex and inefficient. Local difference binary (LDB) is one of state-of-art methods for higher accuracy and speed. Motivated by LDB, we propose an improved LDB named as multiple extended LDB (MELDB) to improve the effectiveness of basic LDB descriptor via gradients and difference of gradient information in four directions and explore much more discriminative noise-invariant features. MELDB has strong robustness under complex illumination and noise conditions. Next, we improve GA and BPSO algorithms called as FDSGA and ALBPSO, respectively. To further improve the discriminative ability of MELDB, a novel feature selection method named as intelligent coordination feature selection (ICFS) is represented to select the optimized subset of MELDB feature, based on co-evolution of FDSGA and ALBPSO. Then, to fully utilize class information, we further promote the ICFS named as class supervised ICFS to select the optimal subset feature. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of proposed methods on CMUPIE, YALE B, YALE B Ext databases and those noisy databases. The results reflect that our methods outperform other state-of-the-art methods and show strong robustness on noise, especially under severe noise conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig.13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Li Y, Sixou B, Peyrin F (2021) A review of the deep learning methods for medical images super resolution problems. IRBM 42(2):120–133

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rajput SS, Singh A, Arya KV et al (2018) Noise robust face hallucination algorithm using local content prior based error shrunk nearest neighbors representation. Signal Process 147:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tao G, Liu Z, Cao J et al (2020) Local difference ternary sequences descriptor based on unsupervised min redundancy mutual information feature selection. Multidimens Syst Signal Process 31(3):771–791

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang D, Yi Z, Pu X (2009) A new incremental PCA algorithm with application to visual learning and recognition. Neural Process Lett 30(3):171–185

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu X, Cui G, Yang J et al (2020) Quadratic optimization for unimodular sequence design via an ADPM framework. IEEE Trans Signal Process 68:3619–3634

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh JH, Kwak N (2013) Generalization of linear discriminant analysis using Lp-norm. Pattern Recogn Lett 34(6):679–685

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandes SL, Bala GJ (2013) A comparative study on ICA and LPP based Face Recognition under varying illuminations and facial expressions. In: 2013 International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing & Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 122–126

  8. Kim W, Suh S, Hwang W et al (2014) SVD face: illumination-invariant face representation. IEEE Signal Process Lett 21(11):1336–1340

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu L, Meng XW, Zhong ZG et al (2017) SAR images target recognition based on wavelet and KSVD. Matrix 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ansari MD, Ghrera SP (2018) Intuitionistic fuzzy local binary pattern for features extraction. Int J Inf Commun Technol 13(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Mäenpää T (2002) Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 7:971–987

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pourreza HR, Masoudifar M, ManafZade MM (2011) LSP: local similarity pattern, a new approach for rotation invariant noisy texture analysis. In: 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE. pp 837–840

  13. Zhang J, Xiao X (2015) Face recognition algorithm based on multi-layer weighted LBP. In: 2015 8th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID). IEEE, 2015, 1: 196–199

  14. Sujay SN, Reddy HSM, Ravi J (2017) Face recognition using extended LBP features and multilevel SVM classifier. In: 2017 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer, and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT). IEEE, pp 1–4

  15. Liu X, Xue F, Teng L. Surface Defect Detection Based on Gradient LBP[C]//2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC). IEEE, 2018: 133–137.

  16. Agarwal M, Singhal A, Lall B (2019) Multi-channel local ternary pattern for content-based image retrieval. Pattern Anal Appl 22(4):1585–1596

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Iso S, Shiba S, Yokoo S (2018) Scale-invariant feature extraction of neural network and renormalization group flow. Phys Rev E 97(5):053304

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ren Z, Sun Q (2020) Simultaneous global and local graph structure preserving for multiple kernel clustering. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst 32(5):1839–1851

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma J, Jiang X, Fan A et al (2021) Image matching from handcrafted to deep features: a survey. Int J Comput Vision 129(1):23–79

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang X, Cheng KTT (2013) Local difference binary for ultrafast and distinctive feature description. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(1):188–194

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tao G, Liu Z, Cao J et al (2018) Local difference ternary sequences descriptor based on unsupervised min redundancy mutual information feature selection. Multidimens Syst Signal Process 31:771–791

    Google Scholar 

  22. Das AJ, Saikia N (2016) Pedestrian detection using dense LDB descriptor combined with HOG. In: 2016 International Conference on Information Technology (InCITe)-The Next Generation IT Summit on the Theme-Internet of Things: Connect your Worlds. IEEE. pp 299–304

  23. Bibars A, Mahroos M (2019) New local difference binary image descriptor and algorithm for rapid and precise vehicle visual localisation. IET Comput Vision 13(5):443–451

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sampson JR (1976) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (John H. Holland). SIAM Rev 18(3):529–530. https://doi.org/10.1137/1018105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vlašić I, Ðurasević M, Jakobović D (2019) Improving genetic algorithm performance by population initialisation with dispatching rules. Comput Ind Eng 137:106030

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shao G, Shangguan Y, Tao J et al (2018) An improved genetic algorithm for structural optimization of Au–Ag bimetallic nanoparticles. Appl Soft Comput 73:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang H, Hu X (2016) Wavelet neural network with improved genetic algorithm for traffic flow time series prediction. Optik 127(19):8103–8110

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xinwu Y, Qiaohui W, Huibin X et al (2016) A coordinated signal control method for arterial road of adjacent intersections based on the improved genetic algorithm. Optik 127(16):6625–6640

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo H, Mao Z, Ding W et al (2019) Optimal search path planning for unmanned surface vehicle based on an improved genetic algorithm. Comput Electr Eng 79:106467

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zou D, Li S, Kong X et al (2019) Solving the combined heat and power economic dispatch problems by an improved genetic algorithm and a new constraint handling strategy. Appl Energy 237:646–670

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shen Y (2018) Improved chaos genetic algorithm based state of charge determination for lithium batteries in electric vehicles. Energy 152:576–585

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yan C, Li M, Liu W et al (2019) Improved adaptive genetic algorithm for the vehicle Insurance Fraud Identification Model based on a BP Neural Network. Theor Comput Sci 817:12–23

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science. IEEE. pp 39–43

  34. Qin Z, Liang Y (2018) Sensor management of LEO constellation using modified binary particle swarm optimization. Optik 172:879–891

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jain I, Jain VK, Jain R (2018) Correlation feature selection based improved-binary particle swarm optimization for gene selection and cancer classification. Appl Soft Comput 62:203–215

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ye X, Chen B, Jing L et al (2019) Multi-agent hybrid particle swarm optimization (MAHPSO) for wastewater treatment network planning. J Environ Manage 234:525–536

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jiang F, Xia H, Tran QA et al (2017) A new binary hybrid particle swarm optimization with wavelet mutation. Knowl-Based Syst 130:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lin G, Guan J, Li Z et al (2019) A hybrid binary particle swarm optimization with tabu search for the set-union knapsack problem. Expert Syst Appl 135:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Xiao J, Chen Y et al (2019) Evolving deep convolutional neural networks by quantum behaved particle swarm optimization with binary encoding for image classification. Neurocomputing 362:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tubishat M, Idris N, Shuib L et al (2020) Improved salp swarm algorithm based on opposition based learning and novel local search algorithm for feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 145:113122

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao YD, Fang ZH (2013) Particle swarm optimization with learning factor of weighted function. Comput Appl 33(08):2265–2268

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang X, Zhang F (2010) Multi-modal medical image registration based on gradient of mutual information and hybrid genetic algorithm. In: 2010 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics. IEEE. pp 125–128

  43. Teng XY, Dong HB, Sun J (2017) Co-evolution method for feature selection problem. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 12(01):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nurfikri FS, Mubarok MS (2018) News topic classification using mutual information and Bayesian network. In: 2018 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT). IEEE. pp 162–166

  45. Liu JH, Yang RH, Sun SH (2011) The analysis of binary particle swarm optimization. J Nanjing Univ (Natural Sciences) 47(5):504–514

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen C, Wang N (2002) Adaptive selection of crossover and mutation probability of genetic algorithm and its mechanism. Control Theory Appl 1:41–43

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Pegado R, Ñaupari Z, Molina Y et al (2019) Radial distribution network reconfiguration for power losses reduction based on improved selective BPSO. Electric Power Syst Res 169:206–213

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wei J, Zhang R, Yu Z et al (2017) A BPSO-SVM algorithm based on memory renewal and enhanced mutation mechanisms for feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 58:176–192

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yang M, Zhang L, Yang J, et al (2011) Robust sparse coding for face recognition. In: CVPR 2011. IEEE. pp 625–632

  50. Yang M, Zhang L, Yang J et al (2012) Regularized robust coding for face recognition. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(5):1753–1766

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu B, Liu Q (2018) Iterative projection based sparse reconstruction for face recognition. Neurocomputing 284:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vo DM, Lee SW (2018) Robust face recognition via hierarchical collaborative representation. Inf Sci 432:332–346

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFE0108300); National Natural Science Foundation of China (52172379, 62001058, U1864204); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102241201, 300102242901).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Chen, T. et al. Noise-insensitive image representation via multiple extended LDB and class supervised intelligent coordination feature selection. J Supercomput 79, 3227–3256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04658-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04658-2

Keywords

Navigation