Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An energy efficient routing scheme in internet of things enabled WSN: neuro-fuzzy approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the deployment of many battery-powered sensors in various applications to gather, process, and analyze meaningful data. Clusters of sensors provide for more efficient data collection and increased scalability in such contexts. A low-latency, long-lived routing strategy is described for WSNs that can connect to the Internet of Things. In this research, we present a neuro-fuzzy approach to energy-efficient routing (NFEER) for IoT-enabled WSNs. The novelty of the proposed algorithms is the multiple parameters for the routing in IoT-enabled WSN as consideration of CH distance to sink, cluster size, and residual energy of CH. These variables are used to find the most efficient path across the network, which will help mitigate the hotspot issue. During the operation on the condition “consider only those nodes which have energy greater than the pre-defined threshold energy,” the NFEER relies on energy thresholds to restrict the set of candidate nodes. Extensive simulations are performed to specify the effectiveness of the NFEER, and it elongates stability period by 27.98%, 13.97%, and 10.91% as compared to existing protocols. The stability duration, residual energy, network lifetime, and throughput are enhanced by the proposed method as compared to PSO-Kmean, BMHGA, and FSO-PSO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this paper.

References

  1. Behera TM, Mohapatra SK, Samal UC, Khan MS, Daneshmand M, Gandomi AH (2019) Residual energy-based cluster-head selection in WSNs for IoT application. IEEE Internet Things J 6(3):5132–5139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahoo BM, Pandey HM, Amgoth T (2021) A whale optimization (WOA): meta-heuristic based energy improvement clustering in wireless sensor networks. In: 2021 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), IEEE. (pp 649–654)

  3. Kaur G, Chanak P, Bhattacharya M (2021) Energy-efficient intelligent routing scheme for IoT-enabled WSNs. IEEE Internet Things J 8(14):11440–11449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sahoo BM, Amgoth T, Pandey HM (2021) Enhancing the network performance of wireless sensor networks on meta-heuristic approach: Grey Wolf Optimization. In: Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Springer, Singapore. (pp 469–482)

  5. Bara’a AA, Khalil EA (2012) A new evolutionary based routing protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Appl Soft Comput 12(7):1950–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sahoo BM, Amgoth T, Pandey HM (2020) Particle swarm optimization based energy efficient clustering and sink mobility in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Netw 106:102237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akkaya K, Younis M (2005) A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 3(3):325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar Kashyap P, Kumar S, Dohare U, Kumar V, Kharel R (2019) Green computing in sensors-enabled internet of things: neuro fuzzy logic-based load balancing. Electronics 8(4):384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen T-T, Pan J-S, Dao T-K, Chu S-C (2018) Load balancing for mitigating hotspot problem in wireless sensor network based on enhanced diversity pollen. J Inf Telecommun 2(1):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singh SK, Kumar P, Singh JP (2018) An energy efficient protocol to mitigate hot spot problem using unequal clustering in WSN. Wirel Pers Commun 101(2):799–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rani S, Ahmed SH, Rastogi R (2020) Dynamic clustering approach based on wireless sensor networks genetic algorithm for Iot applications. Wirel Netw 26:2307–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Luo Z, Xiao J (2020) A hybrid genetic algorithm with bidirectional mutation for maximizing lifetime of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 8:72261–72274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shanthi G, Sundarambal M (2019) FSO–PSO based multihop clustering in WSN for efficient medical building management system. Clust Comput 22(5):12157–12168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Badi A, Mahgoub I (2021) ReapIoT: Reliable, energy-aware network protocol for large-scale internet-of-things (IoT) applications. IEEE Internet Things J 8(17):13582–13592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipare A, Edla DR, Dharavath R (2021) Energy efficient fuzzy clustering and routing using BAT algorithm. Wireless Netw 27(4):2813–2828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nandhini P, Suresh A (2021) Energy efficient cluster based routing protocol using charged system harmony search algorithm in WSN. Wireless Pers Commun 121(3):1457–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaikwad, M., Umbarkar, A., & Bamane, S. (2020). Large-scale data clustering using improved artificial bee colony algorithm. In: ICT systems and sustainability. Springer. (pp 467–475)

  18. Amiri E, Dehkordi MN (2018) Dynamic data clustering by combining improved discrete artificial bee colony algorithm with fuzzy logic. Int J BioInspired Comput 12(3):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Betzler A, Gomez C, Demirkol I, Paradells J (2016) CoAP congestion control for the internet of things. IEEE Commun Mag 54(7):154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Das DK, Dey S (2018) A modified bee colony optimization (mbco) and its hybridization with k-means for an application to data clustering. Appl Soft Comput 70:590–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahoo BM, Pandey HM, Amgoth T (2022) A genetic algorithm inspired optimized cluster head selection method in wireless sensor networks. Swarm Evol Comput 75:101151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang J, Cao Y, Li B, Kim H-J, Lee S (2017) Particle swarm optimization-based clustering algorithm with mobile sink for wsns. Future Gener Comput Syst 76:452–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan X, Lu Y, Sun N, Li S (2019) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm with modified search model for numerical optimization. Clust Comput 22(2):2581–2588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karami A, Guerrero-Zapata M (2015) A fuzzy anomaly detection system based on hybrid PSO-Kmeans algorithm in content-centric networks. Neurocomputing 149:1253–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Shafeiy E, Sallam KM, Chakrabortty RK, Abohany AA (2021) A clustering-based Swarm intelligence optimization technique for the internet of medical things. Expert Syst Appl 173:114648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahoo BM, Pandey HM, Amgoth T (2021) GAPSO-H: a hybrid approach towards optimizing the cluster based routing in wireless sensor network. Swarm Evol Comput 60:100772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Agrawal D, Qureshi MHW, Pincha P, Srivastava P, Agarwal S, Tiwari V, Pandey S (2020) GWOC: grey wolf optimizerâbased clustering scheme for WSNs. Int J Commun Syst 33(8):e4344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zahedi ZM, Akbari R, Shokouhifar M, Safaei F, Jalali A (2016) Swarm intelligence based fuzzy routing protocol for clustered wireless sensor networks. Expert Syst Appl 55:313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahoo BM, Amgoth T (2021) An improved bat algorithm for unequal clustering in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. SN Comput Sci 2(4):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang W, Han G, Feng Y, Lloret J (2017) IRPL: an energy efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. J Syst Architect 75:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Renold AP, Chandrakala S (2017) MRL-SCSO: multi-agent reinforcement learning-based self-configuration and self-optimization protocol for unattended wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 96(4):5061–5079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo W, Yan C, Lu T (2019) Optimizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks via reinforcement-learning-based routing. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 15(2):1550147719833541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagarajan SM, Deverajan GG, Chatterjee P, Alnumay W, Muthukumaran V (2022) Integration of IoT based routing process for food supply chain management in sustainable smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 76:103448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Manuel AJ, Deverajan GG, Patan R, Gandomi AH (2020) Optimization of routing-based clustering approaches in wireless sensor network: review and open research issues. Electronics 9(10):1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gopal DG, Jerlin MA, Abirami M (2019) A smart parking system using IoT. World Rev Entrep Manag Sustain Dev 15(3):335–345

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gopal DG, Gao XZ, Alzubi JA (2021) IoT and big data impact on various engineering applications. Recent Pat Eng 15(2):119–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gopal G (2020) Emerging trends and the importance of network evolution in big data. Recent Adv Comput Sci Commun (Former: Recent Patents Comput Sci) 13(2):158–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Palanisamy S, Sankar S, Somula R, Deverajan GG (2021) Communication trust and energy-aware routing protocol for WSN using DS theory. Int J Grid High-Perform Comput (IJGHPC) 13(4):24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Punia SK, Kumar M, Stephan T, Deverajan GG, Patan R (2021) Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms for big data classification: Ml and ai-based algorithms for big data analysis. Int J E-Health Med Commun (IJEHMC) 12(4):60–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PT: Concept, Design, Analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. ST: Concept, Design, Analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandesh Tripathi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Informed consent

Not applicable, all data generated or analyzed during experimental work are included in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tewari, P., Tripathi, S. An energy efficient routing scheme in internet of things enabled WSN: neuro-fuzzy approach. J Supercomput 79, 11134–11158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05091-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05091-9

Keywords

Navigation