Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the status of CPU working load, processing load and controller bandwidth under the influence of packet-in buffer status located in Openflow switches in SDN-based IoT framework

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, the Internet of Thing has become an integral part of the world's Internet infrastructure. One of the important matters in this field is the security of the network. Some networks like Software-defined Networking are proposed to improve it. In this paper, cyber-attacks have been simulated and various parameters such as the average rate of receiving traffic, the average response time and network delay have been analyzed. In the following, a new plan for switch buffers and their effect on the state of CPU performance, the controller bandwidth and the amount of packet loss have been discussed. The new buffer structure is proposed using a hash table, which uses a DRAM combination structure. To implement the proposed technique, AS5710-54X-EC switch and floodlight controller were used, and also Eclipse Neon 3.1 was used for writing modules. The results imply that this method had a great impact on detecting attacks in SDN-based IoT frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and materials availability

This declaration is “Not applicable”.

References

  1. Laghari AA, Wu K, Laghari RA, Ali M, Khan AA (2021) A review and state of art of Internet of Things (IoT). Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09622-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah Y, Sengupta S (2020, October). A Survey On Classification of Cyber-Attacks on IoT and IIoT Devices. In: 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (pp. 0406–0413). IEEE

  3. Priyadarsini M, Bera P (2021) Software defined networking architecture, traffic management, security, and placement: a survey. Comput Netw 192:108047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wazirali R, Ahmad R, Alhiyari S (2021) SDN-openflow topology discovery: an overview of performance issues. Appl Sci 11(15):6999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu H, Qi H, Li K (2020) WECAN: an efficient west-east control associated network for large-scale SDN systems. Mobile Netw Appl 25:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Echeverría A, Cevallos C, Ortiz-Garces I, Andrade RO (2021) Cybersecurity model based on hardening for secure internet of things implementation. Appl Sci 11(7):3260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manogaran G, Baabdullah T, Rawat DB, Shakeel PM (2021) AI assisted service virtualization and flow management framework for 6G-enabled cloud-software-defined network based IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 9(16):14644–14654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen YW, Sheu JP, Kuo YC, Van Cuong N (2020, June) Design and Implementation of IoT DDoS Attacks Detection System Based on Machine Learning. In: 2020 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC) (pp. 122–127). IEEE

  9. Yin D, Zhang L, Yang K (2018) A DDoS attack detection and mitigation with software-defined internet of things framework. IEEE Access 6:24694–24705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Liu M, Xue Z, Fan X, He X (2020) RTVD: a real-time volumetric detection scheme for DDoS in the internet of things. IEEE Access 8:36191–36201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhayo J, Jafaq R, Ahmed A, Hameed S, Shah SA (2021) A time-efficient approach toward DDoS attack detection in IoT network using SDN. IEEE Internet Things J 9(5):3612–3630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moudoud H, Khoukhi L, Cherkaoui S (2020) Prediction and detection of fdia and ddos attacks in 5g enabled IoT. IEEE Network 35(2):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta BB, Chaudhary P, Chang X, Nedjah N (2022) Smart defense against distributed denial of service attack in IoT networks using supervised learning classifiers. Comput Electr Eng 98:107726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Almaraz-Rivera JG, Perez-Diaz JA, Cantoral-Ceballos JA (2022) Transport and application layer DDoS attacks detection to IoT devices by using machine learning and deep learning models. Sensors 22(9):3367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar P, Bagga H, Netam BS, Uduthalapally V (2022) Sad-IoT: Security analysis of ddos attacks in IoT networks. Wireless Pers Commun 122(1):87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Negera WG, Schwenker F, Debelee TG, Melaku HM, Ayano YM (2022) Review of botnet attack detection in SDN-enabled IoT Using machine learning. Sensors 22(24):9837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kandoi R, Antikainen M (2015, May) Denial-of-Service Attacks in OpenFlow SDN Networks. In: 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) (pp. 1322–1326). IEEE

  18. Adeniji OD, Adekeye DB, Ajagbe SA, Adesina AO, Oguns YJ, Oladipupo MA (2023) Development of DDoS attack detection approach in software defined network using support vector machine classifier. In: Ranganathan G, Bestak R, Fernando X (eds) Pervasive computing and social networking. Springer, Singapore, pp 319–331

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ono D, Guillen L, Izumi S, Abe T, Suganuma T (2021) A proposal of port scan detection method based on packet-in messages in OpenFlow networks and its evaluation. Int J Netw Manage 31(6):e2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu H, Li K, Qi H (2019) An active controller selection scheme for minimizing packet-in processing latency in sdn. Secur Commun Netw 2019:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yue M, Yan Q, Zheng H, Wu Z (2022) Cross-plane DDoS attack defense architecture based on flow table features in SDN. Secur Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7409083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ethilu T, Sathappan A, Rodrigues P (2023) Improving performance and efficiency of software-defined networking by identifying malicious switches through deep learning model

  23. Brahmanand SH, Lal ND, Sahana DS, Nijguna GS, Nayak P (2022) A Systematic approach of analysing network traffic using packet sniffing with scapy framework. In: Smys S, Bestak R, Palanisamy R, Kotuliak I (eds) Computer networks and inventive communication technologies. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed AESF, Elsayed HA (2022, March) Performance Comparison of SDN Wireless Network Under Floodlight and POX Controllers. In: 2022 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEENG) (pp. 91–95). IEEE

  25. Gupta N, Maashi MS, Tanwar S, Badotra S, Aljebreen M, Bharany S (2022) A comparative study of software defined networking controllers using mininet. Electronics 11(17):2715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jain G (2021, March) Application of SNORT and Wireshark in network traffic analysis. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 1119(1):012007

Download references

Funding

This declaration is “Not applicable”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Payame Noor University (PNU), P.O.Box 19395-4697, Tehran, Iran

    Afsaneh Banitalebi Dehkordi

Authors
  1. Afsaneh Banitalebi Dehkordi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All parts of the article were done by ABD.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afsaneh Banitalebi Dehkordi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

This declaration is “Not applicable”.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banitalebi Dehkordi, A. Examining the status of CPU working load, processing load and controller bandwidth under the influence of packet-in buffer status located in Openflow switches in SDN-based IoT framework. J Supercomput 79, 15814–15834 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05258-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05258-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation