Skip to main content
Log in

Fog-inspired framework for emergency rescue operations in post-disaster scenario

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-critical applications, such as emergency systems, healthcare, or smart traffic monitoring, demand latency-aware and real-time decision-making. Excessive delays in rescue actions result in a significant death toll each year around the world. In such crucial situations, technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT) coupled with cloud and fog infrastructure might be extremely effective in post-disaster scenarios. This study investigates the opportunities and prospects, and of combining cloud computing services with fog computing to deliver emergency rescue assistance to victims. A hierarchical framework has been developed in this work that gathers and aggregates data from various IoT devices, undertakes preliminary data processing in fog nodes, and finds optimal paths when certain locations remain inaccessible due to disaster damage. When a victim’s health status is abnormal, an alert is issued to assist the victim, and the cloud server predicts the ambulance’s path so that it arrives with the minimal possibility of delay, preventing any deadly conditions. Also, evaluation of the model has demonstrated that by incorporating fog, significant average delay reduction can be achieved while ensuring better precision, recall value, and response time than the cloud-based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable as authors of the study do not give written consent for their data to be shared.

References

  1. Government of India National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) Some major disaster in India. http://www.ndma.gov.in/en/disaster-data-statistics.html (2020) Online; Accessed 31 Mar 2022

  2. Upadhyay A, Mukhuty S, Kumari S, Garza-Reyes JA, Shukla V (2022) A review of lean and agile management in humanitarian supply chains: analysing the pre-disaster and post-disaster phases and future directions. Prod Plan Control 33(6–7):641–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lili Y, Shuang-Hua Y, Linda P (2013) How the internet of things technology enhances emergency response operations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80(9):1854–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vagelis H, Shu-Ching C, Tao L, Steven L, Yi D (2010) Survey of data management and analysis in disaster situations. J Syst Softw 83(10):1701–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shahid MH, Hameed AR, ul Islam S, Khattak HA, Ud Din I, Rodrigues JPC (2020) Energy and delay efficient fog computing using caching mechanism. Comput Commun 154:534–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aljumah A, Kaur A, Bhatia M, Ahanger TA (2021) Internet of things-fog computing-based framework for smart disaster management. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 32(8):e4078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Meyer MC, Wu Y, Wang YU (2019) Maximum data-resolution efficiency for fog-computing supported spatial big data processing in disaster scenarios. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 30(8):1826–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar JS, Kumar S, Choksi M, Zaveri MA (2020) Collaborative data acquisition and processing for post disaster management and surveillance related tasks using UAV-based IoT cloud. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput 34(4):216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ray NK, Turuk AK (2017) A framework for post-disaster communication using wireless ad hoc networks. Integration 58:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabriel D, Kevin C, Joan C, Eleana A, Nik B (2013) IoTs (Internet of Things) and DfPL (Device-free Passive Localisation) in a disaster management scenario. Simul Model Pract Theory 35:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Higashino T, Yamaguchi H, Hiromori A, Uchiyama A, Yasumoto K (2017) Edge computing and IoT based research for building safe smart cities resistant to disasters. In: 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), IEEE. pp 1729–1737

  12. Erdal C, Tolga C (2007) SENDROM: sensor networks for disaster relief operations management. Wirel Netw 13(3):409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rauniyar A, Engelstad P, Feng B (2016) Crowdsourcing-based disaster management using fog computing in internet of things paradigm. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC). IEEE, pp 490–494

  14. Sakhardande P, Hanagal S, Kulkarni S (2016) Design of disaster management system using IoT based interconnected network with smart city monitoring. In: 2016 International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (IOTA). IEEE, pp 185–190

  15. Sood Sandeep Kumar (2022) Fog-Cloud centric IoT-based cyber physical framework for panic oriented disaster evacuation in smart cities. Earth Sci Inform 15(3):1449–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pace P, Aloi G, Gravina R, Caliciuri G, Fortino G, Liotta A (2019) An edge-based architecture to support efficient applications for healthcare industry 4.0. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 15(1):481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma X, Wang Z, Zhou S, Wen H, Zhang Y (2018) Intelligent healthcare systems assisted by data analytics and mobile computing. In: 2018 14th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), IEEE. pp 1317–1322

  18. Fang L, Yeting G, Zhiping C, Nong X, Ziming Z (2019) Edge-enabled disaster rescue: a case study of searching for missing people. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 10(6):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Osman K, Shahid KMU, Ying H, Khan Samee U, Albert Z (2016) EvacSys: a cloud-based service for emergency evacuation. IEEE Cloud Comput 3(1):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattacharjee S, Roy S, Das Bit S (2019) Post-disaster map builder: crowdsensed digital pedestrian map construction of the disaster affected areas through smartphone based DTN. Comput Commun 134:96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Farzaneh MA, Rezapour S, Baghaian A, Amini MH (2023) An integrative framework for coordination of damage assessment, road restoration, and relief distribution in disasters. Omega 115:102748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jianhua W, Qiming Q, Jianghua Z, Xin Y, Xiao F, Xuebin Q, Xiucheng Y (2015) Knowledge-based detection and assessment of damaged roads using post-disaster high-resolution remote sensing image. Remote Sens 7(4):4948–4967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alireza S, Biplab S (2010) Energy efficient transmission strategies for body sensor networks with energy harvesting. IEEE Trans Commun 58(7):2116–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uddin Md YS, Nicol DM, Abdelzaher TF, Kravets RH (2009) A post-disaster mobility model for delay tolerant networking. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp 2785–2796. IEEE

  25. Hart PE, Nilsson NJ, Raphael B (1968) A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern 4(2):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1:269–271

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhiyong W, John S, Sisi Z (2017) Integration of traffic information into the path planning among moving obstacles. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(3):86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shastri J (2006) Safe navigation during fire hazards using Specknets. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  29. CupCarbon (2022) Cupcarbon u-one 3.8. http://www.cupcarbon.com/. Accessed 30 Sep 2022

  30. Kang J, Adibi S (2015) A review of security protocols in mHealth wireless body area networks (WBAN). Future Network Systems and Security: First International Conference, FNSS 2015, Paris, France, June 11–13, 2015, Proceedings 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–83

Download references

Funding

No funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanika Saini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, K., Kalra, S. & Sood, S.K. Fog-inspired framework for emergency rescue operations in post-disaster scenario. J Supercomput 79, 21057–21088 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05475-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05475-x

Keywords

Navigation