Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ideal solution candidate search for starling murmuration optimizer and its applications on global optimization and engineering problems

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a novel population selection method, fitness distance balance (FDB), and predictive candidate (PC) solution generation hybridization with starling murmuration optimizer (SMO), FDBPC-SMO are proposed. In FDBPC-SMO algorithm, FDB selects subpopulations instead of the separating search strategy (SSS) in the original SMO. The separating size determined in SMO is given as input to the FDB, and the FDB generates the subpopulation based on the distances among the populations. The least squares strategy is applied to the population obtained at the end of the SMO, and the estimated population candidates are found and replaced with the worst solution candidates from the original population. By adding qualitative analysis, the effectiveness of the FDBPC-SMO has been examined based on the dimension and iteration. The success of FDBPC-SMO is the selection of more efficient candidate solutions from the previous population at each iteration, thus minimizing the possibility of getting stuck in the local optimum. The performance of FDBPC-SMO has been investigated on CEC2017 and CEC2019 test sets and seven engineering application problems. In addition, Wilcoxon and Friedman statistical tests confirm the convergence and fitness results of the proposed method. Accordingly, comparing to conventional and improved methods, it is clear that the convergence ability of FDBPC-SMO is superior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Source codes used in analyzing the datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Chong EK, Żak SH (2013) An introduction to optimization, vol 75. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747

  3. Dantzig GB (2002) Linear programming. Oper Res 50(1):42–47

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (2006) Quadratic programming. Numer Optim, pp 448–492

  5. Bellman R (1966) Dynamic programming. Science 153(3731):34–37

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lydia A, Francis S (2019) Adagrad-an optimizer for stochastic gradient descent. Int J Inf Comput Sci 6(5):566–568

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zeiler MD (2012) Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5701

  8. Mirjalili S (2016) Sca: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hashim FA, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W, Mirjalili S (2019) Henry gas solubility optimization: a novel physics-based algorithm. Futur Gener Comput Syst 101:646–667

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sörensen K, Glover F (2013) Metaheuristics. Encyclopedia Oper Res Manage Sci 62:960–970

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chong HY, Yap HJ, Tan SC, Yap KS, Wong SY (2021) Advances of metaheuristic algorithms in training neural networks for industrial applications. Soft Comput 25(16):11209–11233

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang H, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Pradhan B, Mai N-L, Vu D-A (2021) Proposing two novel hybrid intelligence models for forecasting copper price based on extreme learning machine and meta-heuristic algorithms. Resour Policy 73:102195

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karim AM (2022) A new sparse auto-encoder based framework using grey wolf optimizer for data classification problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12493

  14. Abd Elaziz M, Dahou A, Abualigah L, Yu L, Alshinwan M, Khasawneh AM, Lu S (2021) Advanced metaheuristic optimization techniques in applications of deep neural networks: a review. Neural Comput Appl 33(21):14079–14099

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin L, Gen M (2009) Auto-tuning strategy for evolutionary algorithms: balancing between exploration and exploitation. Soft Comput 13(2):157–168

    Google Scholar 

  16. Örnek BN, Aydemir SB, Düzenli T, Özak B (2022) A novel version of slime mould algorithm for global optimization and real world engineering problems: enhanced slime mould algorithm. Math Comput Simul 198:253–288

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho Y-C, Pepyne DL (2002) Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem and its implications. J Optim Theory Appl 115(3):549–570

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Piotrowski AP, Napiorkowski JJ (2018) Step-by-step improvement of jade and shade-based algorithms: Success or failure? Swarm Evol Comput 43:88–108

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cui L, Li G, Zhu Z, Lin Q, Wong K-C, Chen J, Lu N, Lu J (2018) Adaptive multiple-elites-guided composite differential evolution algorithm with a shift mechanism. Inf Sci 422:122–143

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Torabi S, Safi-Esfahani F (2018) Improved raven roosting optimization algorithm (irro). Swarm Evol Comput 40:144–154

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jana B, Mitra S, Acharyya S (2019) Repository and mutation based particle swarm optimization (rmpso): A new pso variant applied to reconstruction of gene regulatory network. Appl Soft Comput 74:330–355

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali MZ, Awad NH, Reynolds RG, Suganthan PN (2018) A balanced fuzzy cultural algorithm with a modified levy flight search for real parameter optimization. Inf Sci 447:12–35

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gao W-f, Liu S-y, Huang L-l (2013) A novel artificial bee colony algorithm based on modified search equation and orthogonal learning. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(3):1011–1024

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huang Q, Zhang K, Song J, Zhang Y, Shi J (2019) Adaptive differential evolution with a lagrange interpolation argument algorithm. Inf Sci 472:180–202

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 1(1):33–57

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-Qaness MA, Gandomi AH (2021) Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 157:107250

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Khateeb B, Ahmed K, Mahmood M, Le D-N (2021) Rock hyraxes swarm optimization: a new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Mater Continua 68(1):643–654

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan Y, Ren J, Wang S, Wang Z, Mu X, Zhao W (2022) Alpine skiing optimization: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 170:103158

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhong C, Li G, Meng Z (2022) Beluga whale optimization: a novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 109215

  30. Chopra N, Ansari MM (2022) Golden jackal optimization: a novel nature-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Expert Syst Appl 198:116924

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hashim FA, Hussien AG (2022) Snake optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 242:108320

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zamani H, Nadimi-Shahraki MH, Gandomi AH (2022) Starling murmuration optimizer: a novel bio-inspired algorithm for global and engineering optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 392:114616

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Whitley D (1994) A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput 4(2):65–85

    Google Scholar 

  34. Storn R (1996) On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization. Proceedings of North American Fuzzy Information Processing, pp 519–523. IEEE

  35. De Castro LN, Von Zuben FJ (2000) The clonal selection algorithm with engineering applications. In: Proceedings of GECCO, vol 2000, pp 36–39

  36. Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(6):702–713

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sulaiman MH, Mustaffa Z, Saari MM, Daniyal H (2020) Barnacles mating optimizer: a new bio-inspired algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103330

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hu Z, Gao C, Su Q (2021) A novel evolutionary algorithm based on even difference grey model. Expert Syst Appl 176:114898

    Google Scholar 

  39. Feng Z-K, Niu W-J, Liu S (2021) Cooperation search algorithm: a novel metaheuristic evolutionary intelligence algorithm for numerical optimization and engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 98:106734

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shi Y (2011) Brain storm optimization algorithm. In: International Conference in Swarm Intelligence, pp 303–309. Springer

  41. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia D (2011) Teaching-learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput Aided Des 43(3):303–315

    Google Scholar 

  42. Askari Q, Younas I, Saeed M (2020) Political optimizer: a novel socio-inspired meta-heuristic for global optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 195:105709

    Google Scholar 

  43. Emami H (2022) Stock exchange trading optimization algorithm: a human-inspired method for global optimization. J Supercomput 78(2):2125–2174

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jahangiri M, Hadianfard MA, Najafgholipour MA, Jahangiri M, Gerami MR (2020) Interactive autodidactic school: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm for solving mathematical and structural design optimization problems. Comput Struct 235:106268

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bouchekara H (2020) Most valuable player algorithm: a novel optimization algorithm inspired from sport. Oper Res Int J 20(1):139–195

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kashan AH (2009) League championship algorithm: a new algorithm for numerical function optimization. In: 2009 International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition, pp 43–48. IEEE

  47. Salih SQ, Alsewari AA (2020) A new algorithm for normal and large-scale optimization problems: nomadic people optimizer. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10359–10386

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kahraman HT, Aras S, Gedikli E (2020) Fitness-distance balance (fdb): a new selection method for meta-heuristic search algorithms. Knowl-Based Syst 190:105169

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ahmadianfar I, Bozorg-Haddad O, Chu X (2020) Gradient-based optimizer: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Inf Sci 540:131–159

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Abualigah L, Diabat A, Mirjalili S, Abd Elaziz M, Gandomi AH (2021) The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 376:113609

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Ahmadianfar I, Heidari AA, Gandomi AH, Chu X, Chen H (2021) Run beyond the metaphor: an efficient optimization algorithm based on Runge-Kutta method. Expert Syst Appl 181:115079

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmadianfar I, Heidari AA, Noshadian S, Chen H, Gandomi AH (2022) Info: an efficient optimization algorithm based on weighted mean of vectors. Expert Syst Appl 195:116516

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tayarani NM-H, Akbarzadeh-TM (2008) Magnetic optimization algorithms a new synthesis. In: 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pp 2659–2664. IEEE

  54. Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) Gsa: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179(13):2232–2248

    Google Scholar 

  55. Abualigah L (2020) Multi-verse optimizer algorithm: a comprehensive survey of its results, variants, and applications. Neural Comput Appl 32(16):12381–12401

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kaveh A, Bakhshpoori T (2016) Water evaporation optimization: a novel physically inspired optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 167:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kaveh A, Akbari H, Hosseini SM (2020) Plasma generation optimization: a new physically-based metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems. Eng Comput

  58. Zitouni F, Harous S, Maamri R (2020) The solar system algorithm: a novel metaheuristic method for global optimization. IEEE Access 9:4542–4565

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hashim FA, Hussain K, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W (2021) Archimedes optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Intell 51(3):1531–1551

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lam A, Li VO (2012) Chemical reaction optimization: a tutorial. Memetic Comput 4(1):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang Z (2019) Atom search optimization and its application to solve a hydrogeologic parameter estimation problem. Knowl-Based Syst 163:283–304

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wei Z, Huang C, Wang X, Han T, Li Y (2019) Nuclear reaction optimization: a novel and powerful physics-based algorithm for global optimization. IEEE Access 7:66084–66109

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rahnamayan S, Tizhoosh HR, Salama MM (2006) Opposition-based differential evolution algorithms. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 2010–2017. IEEE

  64. Ewees AA, Abd Elaziz M, Houssein EH (2018) Improved grasshopper optimization algorithm using opposition-based learning. Expert Syst Appl 112:156–172

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shekhawat S, Saxena A (2020) Development and applications of an intelligent crow search algorithm based on opposition based learning. ISA Trans 99:210–230

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gupta S, Deep K (2019) A hybrid self-adaptive sine cosine algorithm with opposition based learning. Expert Syst Appl 119:210–230

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jiang H, Yang Y, Ping W, Dong Y (2020) A novel hybrid classification method based on the opposition-based seagull optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 8:100778–100790

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yu X, Xu W, Li C (2021) Opposition-based learning grey wolf optimizer for global optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 226:107139

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hussien AG (2022) An enhanced opposition-based salp swarm algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 13(1):129–150

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kohli M, Arora S (2018) Chaotic grey wolf optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. J Comput Design Eng 5(4):458–472

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kaur G, Arora S (2018) Chaotic whale optimization algorithm. J Comput Design Eng 5(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sayed GI, Tharwat A, Hassanien AE (2019) Chaotic dragonfly algorithm: an improved metaheuristic algorithm for feature selection. Appl Intell 49(1):188–205

    Google Scholar 

  73. Qiao W, Yang Z (2019) Modified dolphin swarm algorithm based on chaotic maps for solving high-dimensional function optimization problems. IEEE Access 7:110472–110486

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibrahim A, Ali HA, Eid MM, El-kenawy E-SM (2020) Chaotic harris hawks optimization for unconstrained function optimization. In: 2020 16th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), pp 153–158. IEEE

  75. Ouertani MW, Manita G, Korbaa O (2021) Chaotic lightning search algorithm. Soft Comput 25(3):2039–2055

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yıldız BS, Pholdee N, Panagant N, Bureerat S, Yildiz AR, Sait SM (2022) A novel chaotic henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for solving real-world engineering problems. Eng Comput 38(2):871–883

    Google Scholar 

  77. Onay FK, Aydemır SB (2022) Chaotic hunger games search optimization algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems. Math Comput Simul 192:514–536

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  78. Aydemır SB (2022) A novel arithmetic optimization algorithm based on chaotic maps for global optimization. Evolut Intell, pp 1–16

  79. Zamani H, Nadimi-Shahraki MH, Gandomi AH (2021) Qana: quantum-based avian navigation optimizer algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 104:104314

    Google Scholar 

  80. Chiang H-P, Chou Y-H, Chiu C-H, Kuo S-Y, Huang Y-M (2014) A quantum-inspired tabu search algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Soft Comput 18(9):1771–1781

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ganesan V, Sobhana M, Anuradha G, Yellamma P, Devi OR, Prakash KB, Naren J (2021) Quantum inspired meta-heuristic approach for optimization of genetic algorithm. Comput Electric Eng 94:107356

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wang D, Chen H, Li T, Wan J, Huang Y (2020) A novel quantum grasshopper optimization algorithm for feature selection. Int J Approx Reason 127:33–53

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. Agrawal R, Kaur B, Sharma S (2020) Quantum based whale optimization algorithm for wrapper feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 89:106092

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sayed GI, Darwish A, Hassanien AE (2019) Quantum multiverse optimization algorithm for optimization problems. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):2763–2780

    Google Scholar 

  85. Gao Z-M, Zhao J, et al. (2019) An improved grey wolf optimization algorithm with variable weights. Comput Intell Neurosci

  86. Zhang Y-J, Wang Y-F, Yan Y-X, Zhao J, Gao Z-M (2022) Lmraoa: An improved arithmetic optimization algorithm with multi-leader and high-speed jumping based on opposition-based learning solving engineering and numerical problems. Alex Eng J 61(12):12367–12403

    Google Scholar 

  87. Zhao J, Gao Z-M (2022) The heterogeneous aquila optimization algorithm. Math Biosci Eng 19:5867–5904

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zhao J, Gao Z-M, Chen H-F (2022) The simplified aquila optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 10:22487–22515

    Google Scholar 

  89. AYDEMİR SB (2022) Küresel optimizasyon için gauss kaotik haritası ile kartal optimizasyonu. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 34(1), 85–104

  90. Pant M, Thangaraj R, Abraham A (2011) De-pso: a new hybrid meta-heuristic for solving global optimization problems. New Math Natural Comput 7(03):363–381

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  91. Wang F, Luo L, He X-s, Wang Y (2011) Hybrid optimization algorithm of pso and cuckoo search. In: 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), pp. 1172–1175. IEEE

  92. Mafarja MM, Mirjalili S (2017) Hybrid whale optimization algorithm with simulated annealing for feature selection. Neurocomputing 260:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pasandideh SHR, Khalilpourazari S (2018) Sine cosine crow search algorithm: a powerful hybrid meta heuristic for global optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08485

  94. Gaidhane PJ, Nigam MJ (2018) A hybrid grey wolf optimizer and artificial bee colony algorithm for enhancing the performance of complex systems. J Comput Sci 27:284–302

    Google Scholar 

  95. Nenavath H, Jatoth RK (2019) Hybrid sca-tlbo: a novel optimization algorithm for global optimization and visual tracking. Neural Comput Appl 31(9):5497–5526

    Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang Z, Ding S, Jia W (2019) A hybrid optimization algorithm based on cuckoo search and differential evolution for solving constrained engineering problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:254–268

    Google Scholar 

  97. Şenel FA, Gökçe F, Yüksel AS, Yiğit T (2019) A novel hybrid pso-gwo algorithm for optimization problems. Eng Comput 35(4):1359–1373

    Google Scholar 

  98. Dhiman G (2021) Ssc: a hybrid nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimization algorithm for engineering applications. Knowl-Based Syst 222:106926

    Google Scholar 

  99. Dhiman G (2021) Esa: a hybrid bio-inspired metaheuristic optimization approach for engineering problems. Eng Comput 37(1):323–353

    Google Scholar 

  100. Akyol S (2022) A new hybrid method based on aquila optimizer and tangent search algorithm for global optimization. J Ambient Intell Human Comput, pp 1–21

  101. Sahoo SK, Saha AK (2022) A hybrid moth flame optimization algorithm for global optimization. J Bionic Eng, pp 1–22

  102. Mahajan S, Abualigah L, Pandit AK, Altalhi M (2022) Hybrid aquila optimizer with arithmetic optimization algorithm for global optimization tasks. Soft Comput 26(10):4863–4881

    Google Scholar 

  103. Gao S, Yu Y, Wang Y, Wang J, Cheng J, Zhou M (2019) Chaotic local search-based differential evolution algorithms for optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 51(6):3954–3967

    Google Scholar 

  104. Mohamed AW, Hadi AA, Jambi KM (2019) Novel mutation strategy for enhancing shade and lshade algorithms for global numerical optimization. Swarm Evol Comput 50:100455

    Google Scholar 

  105. Li Y, Han T, Tang S, Huang C, Zhou H, Wang Y (2023) An improved differential evolution by hybridizing with estimation-of-distribution algorithm. Inf Sci 619:439–456

    Google Scholar 

  106. Piotrowski AP (2018) L-shade optimization algorithms with population-wide inertia. Inf Sci 468:117–141

    Google Scholar 

  107. Mohamed AW, Hadi AA, Fattouh AM, Jambi KM (2017) Lshade with semi-parameter adaptation hybrid with cma-es for solving cec 2017 benchmark problems. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp 145–152. IEEE

  108. Meng Z, Pan J-S, Tseng K-K (2019) Pade: an enhanced differential evolution algorithm with novel control parameter adaptation schemes for numerical optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 168:80–99

    Google Scholar 

  109. Layeb A (2022) Tangent search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Neural Comput Appl 34(11):8853–8884

    Google Scholar 

  110. Mehmet K, KAHRAMAN H (2020) Arz-talep tabanli optimizasyon algoritmasinin fdb yöntemi ile iyileştirilmesi: Mühendislik tasarim problemleri üzerine kapsamli bir araştirma. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi 8(5), 156–172(2020)

  111. Madadi MR, Akbarifard S, Qaderi K (2020) Performance evaluation of improved symbiotic organism search algorithm for estimation of solute transport in rivers. Water Resour Manage 34(4):1453–1464

    Google Scholar 

  112. Aras S, Gedikli E, Kahraman HT (2021) A novel stochastic fractal search algorithm with fitness-distance balance for global numerical optimization. Swarm Evol Comput 61:100821

    Google Scholar 

  113. Guvenc U, Duman S, Kahraman HT, Aras S, Katı M (2021) Fitness-distance balance based adaptive guided differential evolution algorithm for security-constrained optimal power flow problem incorporating renewable energy sources. Appl Soft Comput 108:107421

    Google Scholar 

  114. SUİÇMEZ Ç, KAHRAMAN H, YILMAZ C, IŞIK MF, CENGİZ E (2021) Improved slime-mould-algorithm with fitness distance balance-based guiding mechanism for global optimization problems. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 9(6), 40–54

  115. CENGİZ E, YILMAZ C, KAHRAMAN H, SUİÇMEZ Ç Improved runge kutta optimizer with fitness distance balance-based guiding mechanism for global optimization of high-dimensional problems. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 9(6), 135–149

  116. Bakir H, Guvenc U, Kahraman HT, Duman S (2022) Improved lévy flight distribution algorithm with fdb-based guiding mechanism for avr system optimal design. Comput Ind Eng 168:108032

    Google Scholar 

  117. Tang Z, Tao S, Wang K, Lu B, Todo Y, Gao S (2022) Chaotic wind driven optimization with fitness distance balance strategy. Int J Comput Intell Syst 15(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  118. Oszust M, Sroka G, Cymerys K (2021) A hybridization approach with predicted solution candidates for improving population-based optimization algorithms. Inf Sci 574:133–161

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  119. Hamza F, Ferhat D, Abderazek H, Dahane M (2020) A new efficient hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization problems. Eng Comput, pp 1–24

  120. Rao RV, Waghmare G (2017) A new optimization algorithm for solving complex constrained design optimization problems. Eng Optim 49(1):60–83

    Google Scholar 

  121. Qais MH, Hasanien HM, Alghuwainem S (2020) Transient search optimization: a new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Appl Intell 50(11):3926–3941

    Google Scholar 

  122. Houssein EH, Saad MR, Hashim FA, Shaban H, Hassaballah M (2020) Lévy flight distribution: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 94:103731

    Google Scholar 

  123. Gandomi AH, Yang X-S, Alavi AH (2013) Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 29(1):17–35

    Google Scholar 

  124. Çimen ME, Garip Z, Boz AF (2021) Comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms with a new modifieddeb feasibility constraint handling technique. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 29(7):3270–3289

    Google Scholar 

  125. Aras S, Kahraman HT, Gedkli E (2018) Determination of the effects of penalty coefficient on the meta-heuristic optimization process. In: 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing (IDAP), IEEE

  126. Abualigah L, Elaziz MA, Khasawneh AM, Alshinwan M, Ibrahim RA, Al-qaness MA, Mirjalili S, Sumari P, Gandomi AH (2022) Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for solving real-world mechanical engineering design problems: a comprehensive survey, applications, comparative analysis, and results. Neural Comput Appl, pp 1–30

  127. Pan J-S, Zhang L-G, Wang R-B, Snášel V, Chu S-C (2022) Gannet optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Math Comput Simul 202:343–373

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  128. Dhawale D, Kamboj VK, Anand P (2021) An effective solution to numerical and multi-disciplinary design optimization problems using chaotic slime mold algorithm. Eng Comput, pp 1–39

  129. Zhao S, Zhang T, Ma S, Chen M (2022) Dandelion optimizer: a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for engineering applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 114:105075

    Google Scholar 

  130. Dehghani M, Trojovská E, Trojovskỳ P (2022) A new human-based metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems on the base of simulation of driving training process. Sci Rep 12(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  131. Ma J, Xia D, Guo H, Wang Y, Niu X, Liu Z, Jiang S (2022) Metaheuristic-based support vector regression for landslide displacement prediction: a comparative study. Landslides 19(10):2489–2511

    Google Scholar 

  132. Aydemir SB (2023) Enhanced marine predator algorithm for global optimization and engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 184:103517

    Google Scholar 

  133. Cheng G, Lang C, Han J (2022) Holistic prototype activation for few-shot segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 45(4):4650–4666

    Google Scholar 

  134. Lang C, Cheng G, Tu B, Li C, Han J (2023) Base and meta: a new perspective on few-shot segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell

  135. Lang C, Cheng G, Tu B, Han J (2022) Learning what not to segment: A new perspective on few-shot segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8057–8067

  136. Lang C, Wang J, Cheng G, Tu B, Han J (2023) Progressive parsing and commonality distillation for few-shot remote sensing segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Amasya University, Amasya, 05100, Turkey

    Salih Berkan Aydemir

Authors
  1. Salih Berkan Aydemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salih Berkan Aydemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydemir, S.B. Ideal solution candidate search for starling murmuration optimizer and its applications on global optimization and engineering problems. J Supercomput 80, 4083–4156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05618-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05618-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation