Skip to main content
Log in

An effective and robust single-image dehazing method based on gamma correction and adaptive Gaussian notch filtering

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The weather has a detrimental effect on outdoor vision systems and raises the probability of traffic crashes and road accidents. The scattering of atmospheric particles degrades outdoor images captured in poor weather conditions such as haze and fog. The reduced visibility has a significant impact on driving assistance systems designed for automatic vehicles. As a result, clear visibility is critical for outdoor computer vision systems. Image dehazing is one of the ill-posed problems because evaluating transmission depth is challenging. It is essential to estimate transmission depth with the greatest degree of accuracy. In order to estimate or optimize the transmission depth, this paper employs the adaptive Gaussian notch filter and the concept of gamma correction to recover the final scene radiance. The results of the experiments are assessed and compared both quantitatively and qualitatively with state-of-the-art techniques. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed indicators ensure high consistency in qualitative and quantitative evaluation using six performance metrics: two blind assessment indicators (e, r), contrast gain \((C_{gain})\), visual contrast measure (VCM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated during the current study.

References

  1. Ancuti CO, Ancuti C, Timofte R (2020) NH-HAZE: An Image Dehazing Benchmark with Non-homogeneous Hazy and Haze-free Images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 444-445

  2. Ancuti CO, Ancuti C, Timofte R, De Vleeschouwer C (2018) O-haze: A Dehazing Benchmark with Real Hazy and Haze-free Outdoor Images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 754-762

  3. Berman D, Avidan S (2016) Non-local image dehazing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1674-1682

  4. Bi G, Zhang Y, Nie T, Zhang N (2021) Single image dehazing based on haze density estimation in different color spaces. OSA Contin 4(6):1723–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley RA, Terry ME. “Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons." Biometrika, 39(3/4):324-345

  6. Cai B, Xu X, Jia K, Qing C, Tao D (2016) DehazeNet: an end-to-end system for single image haze removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 25:5187–5198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhary RR, Jisnu KK, Meena G (2020) Image dehazing using deep learning techniques. Proc Comput Sci 167:1110–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cui G, Ma Q, Zhao J, Yang S, Chen Z (2023) Image dehazing algorithm based on optimized dark channel and haze-line priors of adaptive sky segmentation. JOSA A 40(6):1165–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui T, Qu L, Tian J, Tang Y (2016) Single image haze removal based on luminance weight prior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER ’16), Chengdu, China

  10. Das SD, Dutta S (2020) Fast deep multi-patch hierarchical network for nonhomogeneous image dehazing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 482-483

  11. Dhara SK, Roy M, Sen D, Biswas PK (2021) Color cast dependent image dehazing via adaptive airlight refinement and non-linear color balancing. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 31:2076–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Economopoulos TL, Asvestas PA, Matsopoulos GK (2010) Contrast enhancement of images using partitioned iterated function systems. Image Vis Comput 28:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fattal R (2008) Single image dehazing. ACM Trans Graph 27:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao Z, Bai Y (2016) Single image haze removal algorithm using pixel-based airlight constraints. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC’16): Tackling the New Challenges in Automation and Computing, Colchester, UK

  15. Han X, Sun Q, Li Y, Ye F (2022) A Novel Sonar Image Denoising Algorithm based on Block Matching. In: 2022 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT) (pp 1-3). IEEE

  16. He K, Sun J, Tang X (2011) Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33:2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hovhannisyan SA, Gasparyan HA, Agaian SS, Ghazaryan A (2021) AED-Net: a single image dehazing. IEEE Access 10:12465–12474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang C, Yang D, Zhang R, Wang L, Zhou L (2018) Improved algorithm for image haze removal based on dark channel priority. Comput Electr Eng 70:659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang N, Hu K, Zhang T, Chen W, Xu Y, Zhao T (2023) Deep hybrid model for single image dehazing and detail refinement. Pattern Recogn 136:109227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jobson DJ, Rahman Z-U, Woodell GA, Hines GD (2006) A comparison of visual statistics for the image enhancement of FORESITE aerial images with those of major image classes. In: Proc SPIE

  21. Ju M, Ding C, Guo YJ, Zhang D (2019) IDGCP: image dehazing based on gamma correction prior. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:3104–3118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ju M, Zhang D, Wang X (2016) Single image dehazing via an improved atmospheric scattering model. The Visual Computer 1

  23. Kumar A, Jha RK, Nishchal NK (2021) An improved Gamma correction model for image dehazing in a multi-exposure fusion framework. J Vis Commun Image Represent 78:103122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Land EH (1986) Recent advances in retinex theory. Vis Res 26:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Land EH, McCann J (1971) Lightness and retinex theory. J Opt Soc Am A, Opt Image Sci 61:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Z et al (2013) Sparse signal recovery by stepwise subspace pursuit in compressed sensing. Int J Distrib Sensor Netw 9:798537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Z et al (2016) Block-based projection matrix design for compressed sensing. Chin J Electron 25:551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li B, Ren W, Fu D, Tao D, Feng D, Zeng W, Wang Z (2019) Benchmarking single-image dehazing and beyond. IEEE Trans Image Process 28:492–505

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Li B, Peng X, Wang Z, Xu J, Feng D (Oct. 2017) AOD-Net: All-in-one dehazing network. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis (ICCV), pp 4770-4778

  30. Liu X, Ma Y, Shi Z, Chen J. (Oct. 2019) GridDehazeNet: attention-based multi-scale network for image dehazing. In: Proc IEEE/CVF Int Conf Comput Vis (ICCV), pp 7314-7323

  31. Liu T, Zheng P, Bao J, Chen H (2023) A state-of-the-art survey of welding radiographic image analysis: challenges, technologies and applications. Measurement 214:112821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu H, Li Y, Nakashima S, Serikawa S (2016) Single image dehazing through improved atmospheric light estimation. Multimed Tools Appl 75:17081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meng G, Wang Y, Duan J, Xiang S, Pan C (2013) Efficient image dehazing with boundary constraint and contextual regularization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis, pp 617-624

  34. Mi Z, Zhou H, Zheng Y, Wang M (2016) Single image dehazing via multi-scale gradient domain contrast enhancement. IET Image Proc 10:206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Narasimhan SG, Nayar SK (2000) Chromatic framework for vision in bad weather. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR)

  36. Narasimhan SG, Nayar SK (2003) Interactive (DE) weathering of an image using physical models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop Color Photometric Methods Comput Vis

  37. Narasimhan SG, Nayar SK (2002) Vision and the atmosphere. Int J Comput Vis 48:233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Narasimhan SG, Nayar SK (2003) Contrast restoration of weather degraded images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Learn 25:713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nayar SK, Narasimhan SG (1999) Vision in bad weather. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis

  40. Okuwobi IP, Ding Z, Wan J, Jiang J (2023) SWM-DE: statistical wavelet model for joint denoising and enhancement for multimodal medical images. Med Novel Technol Dev 18:100234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel O, Maravi YPS, Sharma S (2013) A comparative study of histogram equalization based image enhancement techniques for brightness preservation and contrast enhancement. Signal Image Process Int J 4(5):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Payman M, Masoumzadeh M, Habibi M (2015) A novel adaptive Gaussian restoration filter for reducing periodic noises in digital image. Signal Image Video 9:1179–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pharr M, Humphreys G (2010) Physically based rendering: From theory to implementation. Morgan Kaufmann

  44. Remya RS, Prasad H, Hariharan S, Gopakumar C (2022) Chromosome Image Enhancement for Efficient Karyotyping. In: 2022 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT) (pp 1-6). IEEE

  45. Rohaly AM, Corriveau PJ, Libert JM, Webster AA, Baroncini V, Beerends J, Blin JL, Contin L, Hamada T, Harrison D, Hekstra AP (2000) Video quality experts group: Current results and future directions. In: Visual Communications and Image Processing, 4067, pp 742-753, SPIE

  46. Sakaridis C, Dai D, Van Gool L (2018) Semantic foggy scene understanding with synthetic data. Int J Comput Vision 126:973–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Salazar-Colores S, Cabal-Yepez E, Ramos-Arreguin JM, Botella G, Ledesma-Carrillo LM, Ledesma S (2019) fast image dehazing algorithm using morphological reconstruction. IEEE Trans Image Process 28:2357–2366

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Santra S, Chanda B (2015) Single image dehazing with varying atmospheric light intensity. In: Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG ’15),

  49. Shao Y, Li L, Ren W, Gao C, Sang N (2020) Domain adaptation for image dehazing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2808-2817

  50. Shiau Y-H et al (2013) Hardware implementation of a fast and efficient haze removal method. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1369

  51. Siddiqua M, Belhaouari SB, Akhter N, Zameer A, Khurshid J (2023) MACGAN: an all-in-one image restoration under adverse conditions using multidomain attention-based conditional GAN. IEEE Access 11:70482–70502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Silberman N, Hoiem D, Kohli P, Fergus R (2012) Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images. In: Computer Vision-ECCV 2012: 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, Florence, Italy, Proceedings, Part V 12 746-760, Springer Berlin Heidelberg

  53. Talwar P, Cecil K (2023) Adaptive filter and EMD based de-noising method of ECG signals: a review. Am J Multidisc Rese Dev (AJMRD) 5(03):09–14

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tan RT (2008) Visibility in bad weather from a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recog

  55. Tang Z, Zhang X, Zhang S (2014) Robust perceptual image hashing based on ring partition and NMF. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26:711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tang Z, Zhang X, Li X, Zhang S (2016) Robust image hashing with ring partition and invariant vector distance. IEEE Trans Inf Foren Secur 11:200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tarel J-P, Hautiére N (2009) Fast visibility restoration from a single color or gray level image. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis

  58. Varghese J, Subhash S, Subramaniam K, Sridhar KP (2020) Adaptive Gaussian notch filter for removing periodic noise from digital images. IET Image Proc 14(8):1529–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang Z, Yang Y, Wang Z, Chang S, Yang J, Huang TS (2015) Learning super-resolution jointly from external and internal examples. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(11):4359–4371

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang W, Chang F, Ji T, Wu X (2018) A fast single-image dehazing method based on a physical model and gray projection. IEEE Access 6:5641–5653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang JS, Jeon SY, Choi JH (2022) Acquisition of a single grid-based phase-contrast X-ray image using instantaneous frequency and noise filtering. Biomed Eng Online 21(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang XS, Yang KF, Li YJ (2021) Haze removal with channel-wise scattering coefficient awareness based on grey pixels. Opt Express 29(11):16619–16638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang H, Liu X, Cheung Y (2016) Efficient single image dehazing via scene-adaptive segmentation and improved dark channel model. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN ’16), Vancouver, Canad, Jul

  65. Zhao S, Zhang L, Shen Y, Zhou Y (2021) RefineDNet: a weakly supervised refinement framework for single image dehazing. IEEE Trans Image Process 30:3391–3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhu Q, Mai J, Shao L (2015) A fast single image haze removal algorithm using color attenuation prior. IEEE Trans Image Process 24:3522

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhu Z, Wei H, Hu G, Li Y, Qi G, Mazur N (2021) A Novel Fast Single Image Dehazing Algorithm Based on Artificial Multiexposure Image Fusion. In: IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol 70, pp 1-23, Art no. 5001523, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3024335

  68. Zuiderveld K (1994) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. In: Graphics gems IV. San Diego, USA

Download references

Funding

No funding involve this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK and SKS completed all the experimental results and wrote the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apurva Kumari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, A., Sahoo, S.K. An effective and robust single-image dehazing method based on gamma correction and adaptive Gaussian notch filtering. J Supercomput 80, 9253–9276 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05805-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05805-z

Keywords

Navigation