Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paired restraint domination in extended supergrid graphs

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a graph G with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A subset D of V(G) is said to be a dominating set of G if every vertex not in D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. If, in addition, every vertex not in a dominating set R of G is adjacent to at least one vertex in \(V(G)-R\), then R is called a restrained dominating set of G. A paired restraint dominating set S of a graph G is a restrained dominating set of G satisfying that the induced subgraph by S contains a perfect matching. The problems of computing the dominating set, restrained dominating set, and paired restraint dominating set with minimum cardinality are referred to as the domination, restrained domination, and paired restraint domination problems, respectively. The paired restraint domination problem and its applications are first proposed here. Our focus is on examining the complexity of the proposed problem on extended supergrid graphs and their subclasses, which include grid, diagonal supergrid, and (original) supergrid graphs. The domination problem is known to be NP-complete on grid graphs and, therefore, also on extended supergrid graphs. Our previous research demonstrated that the domination and restrained domination problems on diagonal and original supergrid graphs are NP-complete. However, the complexity of the paired restraint domination problem on grid, diagonal supergrid, and original supergrid graphs remains unknown. The NP-completeness of the paired restraint domination problem on diagonal supergrid graphs is demonstrated in this paper, and this finding is also applicable to the original supergrid graphs and planar graphs with maximum degree 4. We then examine a subclass of diagonal and original supergrid graphs known as rectangular supergrid graphs. These graphs are distinguished by a rectangular shape consisting of m rows and n columns of vertices. Specifically, we address the paired restraint domination problem on \(R_{m\times n}\) and develop a linear time algorithm for \(3\geqslant m\geqslant 1\) and \(n\geqslant m\). Then, when \(n\geqslant m\geqslant 4\), we obtain a tight upper bound on the minimum size of the paired restraint dominating set of \(R_{m\times n}\) and then use this upper bound to establish one lower bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Algorithm 1
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Algorithm 2
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Availability of data and materials

None.

References

  1. Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2020) Topics in domination in graphs. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hung RW, Yao CC, Chan SJ (2015) The Hamiltonian properties of supergrid graphs. Theor Comput Sci 602:132–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Itai A, Papadimitriou CH, Szwarcfiter JL (1982) Hamiltonian paths in grid graphs. SIAM J Comput 11(4):676–686

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Keshavarz-Kohjerdi F, Hung RW (2020) The Hamiltonicity, Hamiltonian connectivity, and longest \((s, t)\)-path of \(L\)-shaped supergrid graphs. IAENG Int J Comput Sci 47:378–391

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark BN, Colbourn CJ, Johnson DS (1990) Unit disk graphs. Discret Math 86:165–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang TY (1992) Domination numbers of grid graphs. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

  10. Chang TY, Clark WE (1993) The domination numbers of the \(5\times n\) and \(6\times n\) grid graphs. J Graph Theory 17:81–108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang TY, Clark WE, Hare EO (1994) Domination numbers of complete grids I. Ars Combin 38:97–112

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Guichard DR (2004) A lower bound for the domination number of complete grid graphs. J Combin Math Combin Comput 49:215–220

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Telle JA, Proskurowski A (1997) Algorithms for vertex partitioning problems on partial \(k\)-trees. SIAM J Discrete Math 10:529–550

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Domke GS, Hattingh JH, Hedetniemi ST, Laskar RC, Markus LR (1999) Restrained domination in graphs. Discrete Math 203:61–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandey A, Panda BS (2017) Restrained domination in some subclasses of chordal graphs. Electron Notes Discrete Math 63:203–210

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Zeng W, Lu C (2012) NP-completeness and APX-completeness of restrained domination in graphs. Theor Comput Sci 448:1–8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Panda BS, Pradhan D (2015) A linear time algorithm to compute a minimum restrained dominating set in proper interval graphs. Discrete Math Algorithms Appl 7:1550020

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Haynes TW, Slater PJ (1998) Paired-domination in graphs. Networks 32:199–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen L, Lu C, Zeng Z (2010) Labelling algorithms for paired-domination problems in block and interval graphs. J Comb Optim 19:457–470

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang GJ, Panda BS, Pradhan D (2012) Complexity of distance paired-domination problem in graphs. Theor Comput Sci 459:89–99

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Panda BS, Pradhan D (2013) Minimum paired-dominating set in chordal bipartite graphs and perfect elimination bipartite graph. J Comb Optim 26:770–785

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Tripathi V, Kloks T, Pandeya A, Paul K, Wang HL (2022) Complexity of paired domination in AT-free and planar graphs. Theor Comput Sci 930:53–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Qiao H, Kang L, Cardei M, Du DZ (2003) Paired-domination of trees. J Global Optim 25:43–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin CC, Tu HL (2015) A linear-time algorithm for paired-domination on circular-arc graph. Theor Comput Sci 591:99–105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lappas E, Nikolopoulos SD, Palios L (2013) An \(O(n)\)-time algorithm for the paired domination problem on permutation graphs. Eur J Combin 34(3):593–608

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Hung RW, Yao CC (2011) Linear-time algorithm for the matched-domination problem in cographs. Int J Comput Math 88(10):2042–2056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hung RW (2012) Linear-time algorithm for the paired-domination problem in convex bipartite graphs. Theory Comput Syst 50:721–738

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin CC, Ku KC, Hsu CH (2020) Paired-domination problem on distance-hereditary graphs. Algorithmica 82:2809–2840

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hung RW (2016) Hamiltonian cycles in linear-convex supergrid graphs. Discret Appl Math 211:99–112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Hung RW, Li CF, Chen JS, Su QS (2017) The Hamiltonian connectivity of rectangular supergrid graphs. Discrete Optim 26:41–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Hung RW, Chen HD, Zeng SC (2017) The Hamiltonicity and Hamiltonian connectivity of some shaped supergrid graphs. IAENG Int J Comput Sci 44:432–444

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hung RW, Keshavarz-Kohjerdi F, Lin CB, Chen JS (2019) The Hamiltonian connectivity of alphabet supergrid graphs. IAENG Int J Appl Math 49:69–85

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Keshavarz-Kohjerdi F, Hung RW (2022) Finding Hamiltonian and longest \((s, t)\)-paths of \(C\)-shaped supergrid graphs in linear time. Algorithms 15(2):61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Keshavarz-Kohjerdi F, Hung RW (2023) The longest \((s, t)\)-path problem on \(O\)-shaped supergrid graphs. Mathematics 11(12):2712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen JS, Hung RW, Keshavarz-Kohjerdi F, Huang YF (2022) Domination and independent domination in extended supergrid graph. Algorithms 15(11):402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hung RW (2023) Restrained domination and its variants in extended supergrid graphs. Theor Comput Sci 956:113832

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Sangeetha S, Swarnamalya M (2019) Paired domination for some simple graphs. In: The 11th National Conference on Mathematical Techniques and Applications, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 2112, 020068

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for many useful comments and suggestions which have improved the presentation and correctness of this paper.

Funding

This work is partly supported by the National Science and Technology Council (Taiwan) under Grant No. MOST 110-2221-E-324-007-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.-W. Hung wrote the main manuscript text and L.-J. Hung review and correct the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruo-Wei Hung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, RW., Hung, LJ. Paired restraint domination in extended supergrid graphs. J Supercomput 80, 13217–13249 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-05940-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-05940-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification