Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Resilience analysis of mine ventilation cyber-physical fusion system

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancing intelligent mining and enhancing the reliability of the physical information systems in mines is a current objective for the coal mining industry. System resilience reflects the system’s ability to handle external and internal disruptions; therefore, quantifying the resilience of the mine’s cyber-physical system (CPS) allows for the assessment of the probability of successful recovery post-attack, thereby enabling targeted decision-making to improve system resilience, reliability, stability, and safety. In this work, the influencing factors were first identified, and an influencing factor system was established through literature review and the Delphi method. Subsequently, the decision experiment and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), maximum mean deviation entropy (MMDE), and interpretive structural model (ISM) methods were employed to study the importance and hierarchical relationships of these factors. Finally, a dynamic Bayesian network considering time-varying factors was used to construct a dynamic CPS resilience assessment model for mining. The results indicate that anti-interference capability is the most critical factor affecting the resilience of the mining CPS. The findings provide valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in optimizing CPS resilience, enhancing CPS reliability, and formulating development strategies for intelligent mining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Pu H, Wang X, Li T, Su C (2024) Dynamic control of low-carbon efforts and process innovation considering knowledge accumulation under dual-carbon policies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 110526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110526

  2. Statistical communiqué of the people's republic of china on the 2023 national economic and social development. In: People’s Daily. pp. 010

  3. Wu A, Zhang R, Sun Y, Sun L, Wang S, Wang X (2024) Differential games of supply chain on consideration of low-carbon reference effect under different carbon quota allocation methods. Systems 12(9):371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guidance on accelerating the development of intelligent coal mines. In: China Coal News. pp. 002

  5. Yinnan He, Ruxiang Q (2024) Analysis of the spatial distribution and future trends of coal mine accidents: a case study of coal mine accidents in China from 2005–2022. Spatial Stat 63:100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100851

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu X, Wang K, Zhang Q, Yao Y. A (2023) Comprehensive evaluation of intelligent coal mine ventilation systems in the internet of things. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 13

  7. Wang X, Zhu J, Su C, Zhen X (2024) Cascade failure modeling and resilience analysis of mine cyber physical systems under deliberate attacks. J Safety Sci Resil 5(3):266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Su C, Deng J, Li X, Cheng F, Huang W, Wang C, He W, Wang X (2024) Research on the Game Strategy of Mutual Safety Risk Prevention and Control of Industrial Park Enterprises under Blockchain Technology. Systems 12(9):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xinping W, Yu S, Chang S (2024) Exploring the willingness and evolutionary process of public participation in community shared energy storage projects: Evidence from four first-tier cities in China. J Clean Prod 143462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143462

  10. Paul S, Ding F, Utkarsh K, Liu W, O’Malley MJ, Barnett J (2022) On vulnerability and resilience of cyber-physical power systems: a review. IEEE Syst J 16(2):2367–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Liu Z, Gao K, Huang Y, Zhu C (2022) Efficient graphical algorithm of sensor distribution and air volume reconstruction for a smart mine ventilation network. Sensors 22(6):2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tutak M, Brodny J, Szurgacz D, Sobik L, Zhironkin S (2020) The impact of the ventilation system on the methane release hazard and spontaneous combustion of coal in the area of exploitation—a case study. Energies 13(18):4891. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie J, Chen D, Du H, Wang Y, Sun X, Bian Z (2023) Research on gas hazard prevention and control of a high-gas fully mechanized mining face based on ventilation system optimization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(45):101709–101724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aboelezz A, Beltran M, Hargather MJ, Hassanalian M, Roghanchi P (2024) Comprehensive design and performance validation of a wind tunnel for advanced respirable dust deposition investigations. J Hazard Mater 478:135516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu B, Wang J, Zhong M, Xu C, Qu B (2023) Multidimensional analysis of coal mine safety accidents in China-70 years review. Min Metall Explor 40(1):253–262

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clark A, Zonouz S (2019) Cyber-physical resilience: definition and assessment metric. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(2):1671–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark KL, Bhatia U, Kodra EA, Ganguly AR (2018) Resilience of the US National Airspace System Airport Network. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 19(12):3785–3794. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2784391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ti B, Li G, Zhou M, Wang J (2022) Resilience assessment and improvement for cyber-physical power systems under typhoon disasters. Ieee Trans Smart Grid 13(1):783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng L, Yao W, Shuai H, Zhou Y, Ai X, Wen J (2023) Resilience assessment for power systems under sequential attacks using double DQN with improved prioritized experience replay. IEEE Syst J 17(2):1865–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patriarca R, Simone F, Di Gravio G (2022) Modelling cyber resilience in a water treatment and distribution system. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 226:108653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanderhaegen F (2017) Towards increased systems resilience: New challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in cyber-physical & human systems. Annu Rev Control 44:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghosh D (2022) Impact of situational awareness attributes for resilience assessment of active distribution networks using hybrid dynamic Bayesian multi criteria decision-making approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 228:108772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caetano HO, Desuo NL, Fogliatto MSS, Maciel CD (2024) Resilience assessment of critical infrastructures using dynamic Bayesian networks and evidence propagation. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 241:109691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. An X, Yin ZM, Tong Q, Fang YP, Yang M, Yang QQ et al (2023) An integrated resilience assessment methodology for emergency response systems based on multi-stage STAMP and dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 238:109445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang K, Wang Y, Zhang X, Li K, Guo Y (2024) Knowledge mapping of mine ventilation technology research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou F, Xin H, Wei L, Shi G, Xia T (2023) Research progress of mine intelligent ventilation theory and technology. Coal Sci Technol 51:314–329

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xinming LU, Hong YIN (2020) The intelligent theory and technology of mine ventilation. J China Coal Society 45(6):2236

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang X, Liu Y (2022) Research and design of intelligent mine ventilation construction architecture. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 17:1232–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Si L, Wang Z, Liu P, Tan C, Chen H, Wei D (2021) A novel coal–rock recognition method for coal mining working face based on laser point cloud data. IEEE Trans Instrument Measure 70:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3108228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Genge B, Kiss I, Haller P (2015) A system dynamics approach for assessing the impact of cyber attacks on critical infrastructures. Int J Critical Infrastruct Protect 10:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ding D, Han Q-L, Xiang Y, Ge X, Zhang X-M (2018) A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems. Neurocomputing 275:1674–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cassottana B, Roomi MM, Mashima D, Sansavini G (2023) Resilience analysis of cyber-physical systems: a review of models and methods. Risk Anal 43(11):2359–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang B, Zhang L, Zhang B, Xiang Y, An L, Wang W (2022) Complex equipment system resilience: composition, measurement and element analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 228:108783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu L, Guo Q, Sheng Y, Muyeen S, Sun H (2021) On the resilience of modern power systems: a comprehensive review from the cyber-physical perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 152:111642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arghandeh R, Von Meier A, Mehrmanesh L, Mili L (2016) On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1060–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Izadi M, Hosseinian SH, Dehghan S, Fakharian A, Amjady N (2021) A critical review on definitions, indices, and uncertainty characterization in resiliency-oriented operation of power systems. Int Trans Electric Energy Syst 31(1):e12680

    Google Scholar 

  38. Reed DA, Kapur KC, Christie RD (2009) Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure. IEEE Syst J 3(2):174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shang Q, Wang T, Li J (2020) Seismic resilience assessment of emergency departments based on the state tree method. Struct Saf 85:101944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Rourke T. (2007) Critical Infrastructure, Interdependencies, and Resilience

  41. Jufri FH, Widiputra V, Jung J (2019) State-of-the-art review on power grid resilience to extreme weather events: definitions, frameworks, quantitative assessment methodologies, and enhancement strategies. Appl Energy 239:1049–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fekete A (2018) Societal resilience indicator assessment using demographic and infrastructure data at the case of Germany in context to multiple disaster risks. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc 31:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hossain E, Roy S, Mohammad N, Nawar N, Dipta DR (2021) Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters. Appl Energy 290:116709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tong Q, Yang M, Zinetullina A (2020) A dynamic bayesian network-based approach to resilience assessment of engineered systems. J Loss Prev Process Ind 65:104152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kammouh O, Gardoni P, Cimellaro GP (2020) Probabilistic framework to evaluate the resilience of engineering systems using Bayesian and dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 198:106813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen X-l, Yu L-x, Lin W-d, Yang F-q, Li Y-p, Tao J et al (2023) Urban resilience assessment from the multidimensional perspective using dynamic Bayesian network: A case study of Fujian Province China. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 238:109469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Z-X, Wang L, Wang Y-M, Martínez L (2023) A novel alpha-level sets based fuzzy DEMATEL method considering experts’ hesitant information. Exp Syst Appl 213:118925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhongyang X, Liu L, Meng Z (2024) What are the key factors influencing scientific data sharing? A combined application of grounded theory and fuzzy-DEMATEL approach. Heliyon 10(15):e35034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu Y, Tang Y, Yang Z, Zhou D, Li L, Wang S (2023) Improved fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method based on two-dimensional correlation coefficient and negation evidence. Soft Comput 27(16):11177–11192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08748-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Qian J, Zhou G, He W, Cui Y, Deng H (2024) Optimization of teacher evaluation indicator system based on fuzzy-DEMATEL-BP. Heliyon 10(13):e34034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen P, Cai B, Wu M, Zhao Y (2022) Obstacle analysis of application of blockchain technology in power data trading based on improved DEMATEL-ISM method under fuzzy environment. Energy Rep 8:4589–4607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Li C-W, Tzeng G-H (2009) Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):9891–9898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen J-K (2021) Improved DEMATEL-ISM integration approach for complex systems. PLoS ONE 16(7):e0254694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gani A, Bhanot N, Talib F, Asjad M (2022) An integrated DEMATEL-MMDE-ISM approach for analyzing environmental sustainability indicators in MSMEs. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(2):2035–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dalvi-Esfahani M, Niknafs A, Kuss DJ, Nilashi M, Afrough S (2019) Social media addiction: applying the DEMATEL approach. Telemat Inf 43:101250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wei D, Liu H, Shi K (2019) What are the key barriers for the further development of shale gas in China? A grey-DEMATEL approach Energy Reports 5:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, NoorulHaq A, Geng Y (2013) An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 47:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Chauhan A, Singh A, Jharkharia S (2018) An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision-making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 68(2):100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang L, Cao Q, Zhou L (2018) Research on the influencing factors in coal mine production safety based on the combination of DEMATEL and ISM. Saf Sci 103:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shakeri H, Khalilzadeh M (2020) Analysis of factors affecting project communications with a hybrid DEMATEL-ISM approach (A case study in Iran). Heliyon 6(8):e04430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Shanker S, Barve A (2021) Analysing sustainable concerns in diamond supply chain: a fuzzy ISM-MICMAC and DEMATEL approach. Int J Sustain Eng 14(5):1269–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Montani S, Portinale L, Bobblo A, Codetta-Raiteri D (2008) RADYBAN: A tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(7):922–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zuo F, Jia M, Wen G, Zhang H, Liu P (2021) Reliability modeling and evaluation of complex multi-state system based on bayesian networks considering fuzzy dynamic of faults. Cmes-Comput Model Eng Sci 129(2):993–1012

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang C, Jin Z, Liu X, Tuanhui Wang Y, Liu SZ, Wang Q (2024) A coal bursting liability evaluation model based on fuzzy set theory and analysis of three influencing factors. Frontiers in Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1378956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wu W, Huang N, Sun L, Zheng X (2017) Measurement and analysis of MANET resilience with fault tolerance strategies. Math Probl Eng 2017:9806365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Li X, Su H, Zhang J (2022) A systematic assessment method of supply resilience for natural gas supply systems. Chem Eng Res Des 182:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Baho DL, Allen CR, Garmestani A, Fried-Petersen H, Renes SE, Gunderson L, Angeler DG (2017) A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09427-220317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Markina-Khusid A, Jacobs RB, Antul L, Cho L, Tran HT (2022) A complex network framework for validated assessments of systems of systems robustness. IEEE Syst J 16(1):1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2021.3064817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Camara J, de Lemos R, Laranjeiro N, Ventura R, Vieira M (2017) Robustness-driven resilience evaluation of self-adaptive software systems. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 14(1):50–64

    Google Scholar 

  70. Li Y, Coolen FPA, Zhu C (2020) A practical reliability design method considering the compound weight and load-sharing. Int J Approximate Reason 127:17–32

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Perkin S, Svendsen AB, Tollefsen T, Honve I, Baldursdottir I, Stefansson H et al (2017) Modelling weather dependence in online reliability assessment of power systems. Proc Ins Mech Eng Part O: J Risk and Reliab 231(4):364–372

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chen Z, Zhang L, Tian G, Nasr EA (2020) Economic maintenance planning of complex systems based on discrete artificial bee colony algorithm. Ieee Access 8:108062–108071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. So Y-K, Ryu B-J (2015) Developing the accurate method of test data assessment with changing reliability growth rate and the effect evaluation for complex and repairable products. J Appl Reliab 15(2):90–100

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kang KH, 김지홍 (2012) Automated attack path enumeration method based on system vulnerabilities analysis. J Korea Ins Inf Security and Cryptol 22(5):1079–1090

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang J, Wang Z, Wang S, Luan S, Shao W (2020) Vulnerability assessments of urban rail transit networks based on redundant recovery. Sustainability 12(14):5756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Algarni AM, Thayananthan V, Malaiya YK (2021) Quantitative assessment of cybersecurity risks for mitigating data breaches in business systems. Appl Sci 11(8):3678. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wu Y, Ru Y, Lin Z, Liu C, Xue T, Zhao X et al (2023) Research on cyber attacks and defensive measures of power communication network. IEEE Internet Things J 10(9):7613–7635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zheng Y, Yan Z, Chen K, Sun J, Xu Y, Liu Y (2021) Vulnerability assessment of deep reinforcement learning models for power system topology optimization. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 12(4):3613–3623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pawar B, Huffman M, Khan F, Wang Q (2022) Resilience assessment framework for fast response process systems. Process Saf Environ Prot 163:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang H, Hou K, Zhao J, Xiaodan Y, Jia H, Yunfei M (2022) Planning-oriented resilience assessment and enhancement of integrated electricity-gas system considering multi-type natural disasters. Appl Energy 315:118824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Xu YJ, Chen ZW (2006) Relevance judgment: what do information users consider beyond topicality? J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(7):961–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Liu X, Chen Z (2021) An integrated risk and resilience assessment of sea ice disasters on port operation. Risk Anal 41(9):1579–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lian Y, Yang Q, Liu Y, Xie W (2022) A spatio-temporal constrained hierarchical scheduling strategy for multiple warehouse mobile robots under industrial cyber–physical system. Adv Eng Inf 52:101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101572

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province, 2024JC-YBMS-587.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Xi‘an University of Science and Technology, Xi‘an, 710054, China

    Pan Du, Xinping Wang, Tiezhi Li & Zhenyu Li

  2. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi‘an University of Science and Technology, Xi‘an, 710054, China

    Chang Su

Authors
  1. Pan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tiezhi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chang Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.D. drafted the primary manuscript; X.W. generated the figures; T.L. compiled the tables; C.S. collected the data; and Z.L. provided funding. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinping Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 50 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, P., Wang, X., Li, T. et al. Resilience analysis of mine ventilation cyber-physical fusion system. J Supercomput 81, 51 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06533-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06533-8

Keywords