Skip to main content
Log in

Formalizing common sense: an operator-based approach to the Tibbles–Tib problem

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues, that a direct formalization of the way common sense thinks about the numerical identity of enduring entities, requires that traditional predicate logic is developed. If everyday language mirrors the world, then persons, organisms, organs, cells, and ordinary material things can lose some parts but nonetheless remain numerically exactly the same entity. In order to formalize this view, two new logical operators are introduced; and they bring with them some non-standard syntax. One of the operators is called ‘the instantiation operator’; it is needed because the existential quantifier and its traditional relatives cannot do the job required. The other operator is called ‘the form-on-matter operator’, and it allows an individual (an instance of a form) to stay the same even though some of its parts (its constituting matter) is taken away from it. Also, a certain kind of predicates, called ‘nature terms’, is needed in order to represent what gives a particular its kind of identity. Both the operators and the nature terms introduced can be used in constructions of formal languages and formal systems, but no such constructions are made in the paper. The paper is structured as a comment on the philosophical problem called ‘the problem of the cats Tibbles and Tib’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Johansson I. (2006a). Identity puzzles and supervenient identities. Metaphysica. International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 7(1): 7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, I. (2006b). Inference rules, emergent wholes, and supervenient properties. TripleC—open access online Journal for the Foundations of Information Science, 4(2), 127–135. Retrieved February 5, 2007, from http://triplec.uti.at/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E.J. (1989). Kinds of being. A study of individuation, identity and the logic of sortal terms. Oxford, Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E.J. (2002). Survey of metaphysics. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E.J. (2006). The four-category ontology. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1990). Artificial intelligence, logic and formalizing common sense. In R. Thomason (Ed.), Philosophical logic and artificial intelligence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 1989. Retrieved February 5, 2007, from http://www.formal.stanford.edu/jmc/

  • Smith, B. (2005). Against fantology. In M. E. Reicher & J. C. Marek (Eds.), Experience and analysis (pp. 153–170). Wien: öbvɛtpht; http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/Against_Fantology.pdf

  • Varzi, A.C. (1998). Basic problems of mereotopology. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information systems (pp. 29–38). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A.N., Russell B. (1962). Principia mathematica to *56. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingvar Johansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, I. Formalizing common sense: an operator-based approach to the Tibbles–Tib problem. Synthese 163, 217–225 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9199-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9199-0

Keywords

Navigation